Got a weird growth on my tongue took 12.5 ivermectin for a while daily it fell off after a while thought I was outta the woods and it was just some random shit. It’s coming back rn after a month and I’m worrying it may be oral cancer. (Looks like a lot of photos and that’s why I took the ivermectin I had on hand before) Gunna order the full protocol and will document from day 1 Rx if it ends up being cancer.
It's very tricky with Vitamin D because while most are deficient the 2500 IU I cited is considered 333% daily value. Ideally, bloodwork should be performed to ascertain levels, but 10,000 IU is not out of the question.
I will review the mouse study and extrapolate to human dosage in next article.
I would definitely get Vitamin D from the sun if possible (no sunscreen) and naked or shorts/tank🌞🙌. My Vitamin D level was 100% when I had a blood test done a couple years ago. I think it definitely works with the immune system!
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
Vitamin D acceptance delayed by Big Pharma following the Disinformation Playbook
Commentary by William B. Grant, Ph.D.
(OMNS Oct 1 2018) A "Disinformation Playbook" has been used for decades by corporations to delay government action on matters of public interest that would adversely affect their income and profit. Some well-known examples include the big tobacco companies, the coal and oil industries, the sugar industry, and the National Football League. The Union of Concerned Scientists has outlined five "pillars" of the Playbook [Disinformation Playbook], [Alvord 2017]. Big Pharma may be using the Playbook to slow the adoption of strong support for vitamin D. This article is the product of my further analysis.
The Disinformation Playbook
1. The Fake
Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
2. The Blitz
Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry.
3. The Diversion
Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
4. The Screen
Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
5. The Fix
Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
Background and evidence that vitamin D improves health outcomes
Big Pharma and its allies in the U.S. and perhaps also in Europe are opposing major recommendations for increases in vitamin D intakes and higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels [above 30 or 40 ng/ml (75-100 nmol/l)], apparently because such measures can significantly reduce the burden of human disease and, therefore, would reduce income and profit from treating disease. Healthcare in the U.S. now consumes almost 20% of the gross domestic product.
Historically, vitamin D was associated with prevention and cure of rickets and osteomalacia, and later with calcium absorption and bone health. In the past two decades, evidence has accrued showing that higher 25(OH)D serum levels from diet, supplements, and/or solar UVB exposure, are associated and mechanistically linked to better health and longer life expectancy.
In 2009-2010, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reviewed the evidence regarding vitamin D, and was instructed by the study sponsors, the Food and Drug Agency, the National Institutes of Health, and Health Canada, to use only the evidence from published high-quality vitamin D randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, by that time, such trials had only found benefits for bone health. From these studies it was known that bone health 'normalizes' above 25(OH)D levels of~20 ng/ml (50 nmol/l). However, they also used evidence from purely observational studies to suggest that there were risks associated with vitamin D supplementation that raised serum 25(OH)D levels above 30 ng/ml [Ross, 2011a]. This was the basis for their hypothesis of a U-shaped serum 25(OH)D level vs. health outcome relationship (higher risk for both low and high levels). However, this concern was later shown to be largely unfounded since most of the studies reporting U-shaped risk vs. serum level had no data for subject vitamin D supplementation, or for when it had started, thereby confounding subject stratification [Grant, 2016].
Over the last two decades, evidence has accumulated that UVB exposure and vitamin D have many non-skeletal health benefits, mainly from ecological and observational studies and from mechanistic evidence. Recent evidence has accumulated from vitamin D supplementation studies, especially those showing a correction of deficiency [Martineau, 2016]. Such evidence is now strong for cancer [Moukayed, 2013], [Grant, 2017], [Grant, 2018], [McDonnell, 2018], cardiovascular disease [Zhang, 2017], [Wimalawansa, 2018], respiratory tract infections [Martineau, 2017], all-cause mortality rates [Grant, 2011], [Garland, 2014], [Grant, 2016], [Lindqvist, 2016], and pregnancy and birth outcomes such as preterm birth [McDonnell, 2017], [Wagner, 2018] and as now widely reviewed [e.g. Holick, 2007; Pludowski, 2013; Baggerly, 2015; Grant, 2018; Page, 2018; Sorenson and Grant, 2018].
Recommended vitamin D intakes and optimal 'target' serum 25(OH)D levels have increased since the IOM report. For example, The Endocrine Society subsequently recommended 1000-4000 IU/d (25-100 mcg/d) vitamin D supplement intakes and serum 25(OH)D levels >30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l) for patients with baseline insufficiency [Holick, 2011]. A more recent review of vitamin D supplementation guidelines also recommended >30 ng/ml [Pludowski, 2018]. However, such recommendations may be replaced in the near future by those recommending >40 ng/ml based on studies such as those reported recently for preterm birth [McDonnell, 2017] and breast cancer [McDonnell, 2018]. One reason for the low earlier recommendations was the large underestimate made by the IOM in calculating intakes for the average population, (i.e. in 50% of the population) rather than for 97.5% of the population for whom the recommendations were presumed to be aimed [Veugelers & Ekwaru, 2014].
Of course, Big Pharma and its allies must follow current research findings on vitamin D with trepidation since they also realize that the general public also follows the research and has increased its rates of self-supplementation with > 1000 IU/d vitamin D from 0.2% of the population in 2001-2002 to 18.2% in 2013-2014, and that supplementation with >4000 IU/d has also increased from 0.2% in 2007-2008 to 3.2% in 2013-2014 [Rooney, 2017].
These are my impressions from things I have read over the past 4 years since March 2020.
1. Dr. Hulda Clark ..... parasites and toxins are the source of all diseases/illness/cancer (can browse 2 of her books for free .... scroll down the page at this link to the "Download this book for FREE as a PDF" at this category Books at https://drclarkstore.com/collections/books/products/the-cure-for-all-diseases )
2. By definition .... viruses are obligate parasites (per Florida sharkman link to Brittanica dictionary?)
4. apparently Dr. Paul Marik is the most published critical care physician in the world.... 200 page Cancer Care .... published in June 2023 ... updated periodically ... latest version at
he developed a protocol for sepsis which includes iv vitamin c, in 2016 .... used in 10% of U.S. hospitals I read in 2020 .... has a less than 1% mortality rate versus the 30-50% mortality rate of standard of care in the U.S. .... apparently 1000 a day?? or 200,000 to 300,000 Americans die of sepsis each year. https://www.faim.org/interview-with-dr-paul-marik-on-vitamin-c-protocol-for-sepsis
5. Dr. Judy Mikovits ... 3 books .... Plague, Plague of Corruption, End of Plague, retroviruses from cell lines used to produce vaccines are causing illness/disease/cancer throughout the population ..... her discoveries in 2009/2010 .... announced in 2011 I believe it was.
6. Dr. Robert Cathcart .... high enough divided doses of vitamin c will eliminate any virus
7. www.orthomolecular.org select Library, select News Releases .... articles going back to 2005 ... very important information about advances in medical treatments using orthomolecular medicine from orthomolecular societies from around the world .....
first 10 minutes of this interview .... from Sept 2020 ...1000 doctors in Japan are using the Riordan protocol for cancer which includes IV vitamin C
The Power of Intravenous Vitamin C with Dr Ron Hunninghake
Lisa Tamati Sep 18, 2020
Dr Ron Hunninghake is the Chief Medical Officer of the prestigious Riordan Institute in Witchita, Kansas.
In this episode Dr Ron explains the uses and mechanisms of action of Vitamin C both oral and intravenous Vitamin C and it's uses in cancer, sepsis, pneumonia, shingles, hepatitis to schizophrenia and mental illnesses.
They also discuss the problems facing functional medicine/orthomolecular medicine vs allopathic medicine and the pharmacological model dominant in our system today.
Cancer researchers at University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center have received a five-year, $9.7 million grant from the National Cancer Institute to test the use of high-dose, intravenous (IV) vitamin C in the treatment of cancer.
The integrated project, led by Joseph Cullen, MD, UI professor of surgery, and Douglas Spitz, PhD, UI professor of radiation oncology, is designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of adding high-dose IV vitamin C to standard cancer treatments for three of the deadliest cancers affecting the U.S. population: pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), an aggressive type of brain cancer.
“Success in this project would suggest that adding high-dose IV vitamin C to cancer treatment protocols could be a safe, simple, and cost-effective approach to improving treatment for many kinds of cancer,” Cullen says. “If the results from our early- and mid-phase clinical trials are positive, the next step would be to test this therapy in large, stage 3 clinical trials that could lead to approval of this approach and have a powerful and lasting impact on clinical cancer care in the coming years.”
All well and good but pointless if you are still using a phone or haven't reduced EMF in your home and low impedance is what's feeding the cancer. Here I delve into blood clotting
protocol b for a variety of things.... active cancer.... apparently 3 to 12 months until no evidence of disease
The florida sharkman disagrees apparently with the dosing of fenbendazole by the tippen protocol........ unfortunately I haven't had time to study this in depth to understand the differences
here is the link ....
copied from the link below
"The simplified claim is that most cancers (and many other conditions) are caused by parasites; therefore, the parasite protocol has the potential to cure most cancers and many other disorders.
This protocol utilizes multiple substances such as Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Doxycycline, and a few others, for a broad-spectrum strategy as well as substances that help cleanse the gut.
It is important to begin the protocol relative to moon-phases because of how parasite lifecycles work. This timing helps kill parasites more efficiently."
"A Quick Overview Video of this Parasite Protocol & Cleanse:" ..... in this video .... when talking about fenbendazole .... it says that the Tippen protocol does not dose properly? can anyone get to the bottom of this difference?
Got a weird growth on my tongue took 12.5 ivermectin for a while daily it fell off after a while thought I was outta the woods and it was just some random shit. It’s coming back rn after a month and I’m worrying it may be oral cancer. (Looks like a lot of photos and that’s why I took the ivermectin I had on hand before) Gunna order the full protocol and will document from day 1 Rx if it ends up being cancer.
Excellent thanks for the transcript. I already had the video in my 'watch later' list but now I won't need to take notes - perfect.
Clif High also says he cured his cancer with fenbendazole...
Cliff says many things like most of us, do we reiterate the same in person, I would love to know?
Not enough vitamin D3. Should be 10,000 IU per day, at least.
It's very tricky with Vitamin D because while most are deficient the 2500 IU I cited is considered 333% daily value. Ideally, bloodwork should be performed to ascertain levels, but 10,000 IU is not out of the question.
I will review the mouse study and extrapolate to human dosage in next article.
I would definitely get Vitamin D from the sun if possible (no sunscreen) and naked or shorts/tank🌞🙌. My Vitamin D level was 100% when I had a blood test done a couple years ago. I think it definitely works with the immune system!
love this book on vitamin d ..............
************************************************
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
before you read any study https://normanjames.substack.com/p/logic-wisdom-then-science-to-confirm?utm_source=publication-search
interesting the resistance ................
https://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v14n22.shtml
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, Oct 1, 2018
Vitamin D acceptance delayed by Big Pharma following the Disinformation Playbook
Commentary by William B. Grant, Ph.D.
(OMNS Oct 1 2018) A "Disinformation Playbook" has been used for decades by corporations to delay government action on matters of public interest that would adversely affect their income and profit. Some well-known examples include the big tobacco companies, the coal and oil industries, the sugar industry, and the National Football League. The Union of Concerned Scientists has outlined five "pillars" of the Playbook [Disinformation Playbook], [Alvord 2017]. Big Pharma may be using the Playbook to slow the adoption of strong support for vitamin D. This article is the product of my further analysis.
The Disinformation Playbook
1. The Fake
Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
2. The Blitz
Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry.
3. The Diversion
Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
4. The Screen
Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
5. The Fix
Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
Background and evidence that vitamin D improves health outcomes
Big Pharma and its allies in the U.S. and perhaps also in Europe are opposing major recommendations for increases in vitamin D intakes and higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels [above 30 or 40 ng/ml (75-100 nmol/l)], apparently because such measures can significantly reduce the burden of human disease and, therefore, would reduce income and profit from treating disease. Healthcare in the U.S. now consumes almost 20% of the gross domestic product.
Historically, vitamin D was associated with prevention and cure of rickets and osteomalacia, and later with calcium absorption and bone health. In the past two decades, evidence has accrued showing that higher 25(OH)D serum levels from diet, supplements, and/or solar UVB exposure, are associated and mechanistically linked to better health and longer life expectancy.
In 2009-2010, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reviewed the evidence regarding vitamin D, and was instructed by the study sponsors, the Food and Drug Agency, the National Institutes of Health, and Health Canada, to use only the evidence from published high-quality vitamin D randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, by that time, such trials had only found benefits for bone health. From these studies it was known that bone health 'normalizes' above 25(OH)D levels of~20 ng/ml (50 nmol/l). However, they also used evidence from purely observational studies to suggest that there were risks associated with vitamin D supplementation that raised serum 25(OH)D levels above 30 ng/ml [Ross, 2011a]. This was the basis for their hypothesis of a U-shaped serum 25(OH)D level vs. health outcome relationship (higher risk for both low and high levels). However, this concern was later shown to be largely unfounded since most of the studies reporting U-shaped risk vs. serum level had no data for subject vitamin D supplementation, or for when it had started, thereby confounding subject stratification [Grant, 2016].
Over the last two decades, evidence has accumulated that UVB exposure and vitamin D have many non-skeletal health benefits, mainly from ecological and observational studies and from mechanistic evidence. Recent evidence has accumulated from vitamin D supplementation studies, especially those showing a correction of deficiency [Martineau, 2016]. Such evidence is now strong for cancer [Moukayed, 2013], [Grant, 2017], [Grant, 2018], [McDonnell, 2018], cardiovascular disease [Zhang, 2017], [Wimalawansa, 2018], respiratory tract infections [Martineau, 2017], all-cause mortality rates [Grant, 2011], [Garland, 2014], [Grant, 2016], [Lindqvist, 2016], and pregnancy and birth outcomes such as preterm birth [McDonnell, 2017], [Wagner, 2018] and as now widely reviewed [e.g. Holick, 2007; Pludowski, 2013; Baggerly, 2015; Grant, 2018; Page, 2018; Sorenson and Grant, 2018].
Recommended vitamin D intakes and optimal 'target' serum 25(OH)D levels have increased since the IOM report. For example, The Endocrine Society subsequently recommended 1000-4000 IU/d (25-100 mcg/d) vitamin D supplement intakes and serum 25(OH)D levels >30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l) for patients with baseline insufficiency [Holick, 2011]. A more recent review of vitamin D supplementation guidelines also recommended >30 ng/ml [Pludowski, 2018]. However, such recommendations may be replaced in the near future by those recommending >40 ng/ml based on studies such as those reported recently for preterm birth [McDonnell, 2017] and breast cancer [McDonnell, 2018]. One reason for the low earlier recommendations was the large underestimate made by the IOM in calculating intakes for the average population, (i.e. in 50% of the population) rather than for 97.5% of the population for whom the recommendations were presumed to be aimed [Veugelers & Ekwaru, 2014].
Of course, Big Pharma and its allies must follow current research findings on vitamin D with trepidation since they also realize that the general public also follows the research and has increased its rates of self-supplementation with > 1000 IU/d vitamin D from 0.2% of the population in 2001-2002 to 18.2% in 2013-2014, and that supplementation with >4000 IU/d has also increased from 0.2% in 2007-2008 to 3.2% in 2013-2014 [Rooney, 2017].
too much EMF especially in a home cant remediate anything permanently if you sleep in it anything you do like D3 is just temporary ....https://normanjames.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/143470609/share-center?alreadyPublished=true
Do you think this protocol will work for some who was Covid vaccinated AND then went through chemo, only to have the cancer return?
I don’t see why It wouldn’t work just cause you were vaxxed.
Yes, I think it will work.
These are my impressions from things I have read over the past 4 years since March 2020.
1. Dr. Hulda Clark ..... parasites and toxins are the source of all diseases/illness/cancer (can browse 2 of her books for free .... scroll down the page at this link to the "Download this book for FREE as a PDF" at this category Books at https://drclarkstore.com/collections/books/products/the-cure-for-all-diseases )
2. By definition .... viruses are obligate parasites (per Florida sharkman link to Brittanica dictionary?)
3. https://jeffreydachmd.com/2016/05/cancer-as-a-parasitic-disease/
4. apparently Dr. Paul Marik is the most published critical care physician in the world.... 200 page Cancer Care .... published in June 2023 ... updated periodically ... latest version at
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-2024-03-29.pdf
he developed a protocol for sepsis which includes iv vitamin c, in 2016 .... used in 10% of U.S. hospitals I read in 2020 .... has a less than 1% mortality rate versus the 30-50% mortality rate of standard of care in the U.S. .... apparently 1000 a day?? or 200,000 to 300,000 Americans die of sepsis each year. https://www.faim.org/interview-with-dr-paul-marik-on-vitamin-c-protocol-for-sepsis
5. Dr. Judy Mikovits ... 3 books .... Plague, Plague of Corruption, End of Plague, retroviruses from cell lines used to produce vaccines are causing illness/disease/cancer throughout the population ..... her discoveries in 2009/2010 .... announced in 2011 I believe it was.
6. Dr. Robert Cathcart .... high enough divided doses of vitamin c will eliminate any virus
https://www.optimalc.com/images/xcathcart-vitamin-c-dose-chart.jpg.pagespeed.ic.9Q4ns_Xv02.jpg
https://www.losaltosonline.com/archives/obituary-robert-f-cathcart-iii-m-d-innovator-in-medicine/article_f03735f5-171c-5905-ad6d-9010b5bffc7f.html
7. www.orthomolecular.org select Library, select News Releases .... articles going back to 2005 ... very important information about advances in medical treatments using orthomolecular medicine from orthomolecular societies from around the world .....
first 10 minutes of this interview .... from Sept 2020 ...1000 doctors in Japan are using the Riordan protocol for cancer which includes IV vitamin C
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NoUcktt58
The Power of Intravenous Vitamin C with Dr Ron Hunninghake
Lisa Tamati Sep 18, 2020
Dr Ron Hunninghake is the Chief Medical Officer of the prestigious Riordan Institute in Witchita, Kansas.
In this episode Dr Ron explains the uses and mechanisms of action of Vitamin C both oral and intravenous Vitamin C and it's uses in cancer, sepsis, pneumonia, shingles, hepatitis to schizophrenia and mental illnesses.
They also discuss the problems facing functional medicine/orthomolecular medicine vs allopathic medicine and the pharmacological model dominant in our system today.
8. https://medicine.uiowa.edu/content/grant-will-fund-cancer-clinical-trials-test-high-dose-vitamin-c Grant will fund cancer clinical trials to test high-dose vitamin C
Date: Monday, November 19, 2018
Cancer researchers at University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center have received a five-year, $9.7 million grant from the National Cancer Institute to test the use of high-dose, intravenous (IV) vitamin C in the treatment of cancer.
The integrated project, led by Joseph Cullen, MD, UI professor of surgery, and Douglas Spitz, PhD, UI professor of radiation oncology, is designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of adding high-dose IV vitamin C to standard cancer treatments for three of the deadliest cancers affecting the U.S. population: pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), an aggressive type of brain cancer.
“Success in this project would suggest that adding high-dose IV vitamin C to cancer treatment protocols could be a safe, simple, and cost-effective approach to improving treatment for many kinds of cancer,” Cullen says. “If the results from our early- and mid-phase clinical trials are positive, the next step would be to test this therapy in large, stage 3 clinical trials that could lead to approval of this approach and have a powerful and lasting impact on clinical cancer care in the coming years.”
Any data on azoles and/or IVM with prostate CA? I have a friend with Gleason 9 disease adn he needs help. cheers and all the best, Z
Just told I have a strange spot in my brain, have just ordered vitamin E, fingers crossed this stuff starts to work soon...
Very well written. Thank you for including the information from Dr. Makis as well. Looking forward to your future updates.
All well and good but pointless if you are still using a phone or haven't reduced EMF in your home and low impedance is what's feeding the cancer. Here I delve into blood clotting
the electric diet and what is the cause of cancer
https://normanjames.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/143470609/share-center?alreadyPublished=true
there is another protocol (s) at www.floridasharkman.org account on Truth Social and Rumble I believe
what I have gathered from following for about a year...
fenbendazole, ivermectin, doxycycline, berberine ....
anti-viral protocol
protocol b for a variety of things.... active cancer.... apparently 3 to 12 months until no evidence of disease
The florida sharkman disagrees apparently with the dosing of fenbendazole by the tippen protocol........ unfortunately I haven't had time to study this in depth to understand the differences
here is the link ....
copied from the link below
"The simplified claim is that most cancers (and many other conditions) are caused by parasites; therefore, the parasite protocol has the potential to cure most cancers and many other disorders.
This protocol utilizes multiple substances such as Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Doxycycline, and a few others, for a broad-spectrum strategy as well as substances that help cleanse the gut.
It is important to begin the protocol relative to moon-phases because of how parasite lifecycles work. This timing helps kill parasites more efficiently."
https://www.contrabandcures.com/Parasite_Protocols/
page down at this link to the
"A Quick Overview Video of this Parasite Protocol & Cleanse:" ..... in this video .... when talking about fenbendazole .... it says that the Tippen protocol does not dose properly? can anyone get to the bottom of this difference?
How about Mjolnir's Medical Metal podcast, it's early and I feel like I am hungover, God I wish.
You and doc can lively discuss, the finer points over who's Metal and who is the Hammer
This information invaluable. Thank you.