Not only was there never any 97% consensus “on human-driven climate change”, but all such assertions were either purposely or ignorantly dishonest. And, any “scientist” who actually believes such nonsense that climate change is dependent upon or measurably impacted by the exceedingly micro-minimal and puny portion of man’s activities c…
Not only was there never any 97% consensus “on human-driven climate change”, but all such assertions were either purposely or ignorantly dishonest. And, any “scientist” who actually believes such nonsense that climate change is dependent upon or measurably impacted by the exceedingly micro-minimal and puny portion of man’s activities compared to the immense power of nature’s natural cycles, could possibly benefit from some psychoanalysis sessions or just a moment of common sense.
Not only was there never any 97% consensus “on human-driven climate change”, but all such assertions were either purposely or ignorantly dishonest. And, any “scientist” who actually believes such nonsense that climate change is dependent upon or measurably impacted by the exceedingly micro-minimal and puny portion of man’s activities compared to the immense power of nature’s natural cycles, could possibly benefit from some psychoanalysis sessions or just a moment of common sense.