The biggest question that never gets answered is how many of these actual scientists have evidence or even a plausible model showing that any human action (other than new technology) can meaningfully impact any of these trends? And without causing more harm than good?
All of the climate accords if followed perfectly (which we all know won…
The biggest question that never gets answered is how many of these actual scientists have evidence or even a plausible model showing that any human action (other than new technology) can meaningfully impact any of these trends? And without causing more harm than good?
All of the climate accords if followed perfectly (which we all know won’t happen) still result in increased human carbon emissions. Completely eliminating ALL carbon from North America and Europe would still leave more total carbon emissions than just 20 years ago.
Even when you give them every single benefit of the doubt, their proposals are still a bad deal.
The biggest question that never gets answered is how many of these actual scientists have evidence or even a plausible model showing that any human action (other than new technology) can meaningfully impact any of these trends? And without causing more harm than good?
All of the climate accords if followed perfectly (which we all know won’t happen) still result in increased human carbon emissions. Completely eliminating ALL carbon from North America and Europe would still leave more total carbon emissions than just 20 years ago.
Even when you give them every single benefit of the doubt, their proposals are still a bad deal.