IMHO, the only reason Health Canada is suddenly and publicly seemingly jumped on the “ antivaxxer “ train is because are squarely aiming to shift the blame that should be on them, to Pfizer: HC’s Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate claims it “reviews scientific information to assess the safety, efficacy, and quality of a prescription drug; …
IMHO, the only reason Health Canada is suddenly and publicly seemingly jumped on the “ antivaxxer “ train is because are squarely aiming to shift the blame that should be on them, to Pfizer: HC’s Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate claims it “reviews scientific information to assess the safety, efficacy, and quality of a prescription drug; assesses the potential benefits and risks of a prescription drug; reviews Clinical Trial Applications (CTAs) for prescription drugs to ensure that the studies are well-designed and that participants will not be exposed to undue risk; monitors the evolving safety of drugs in development through the review of adverse reaction reports that are submitted as a requirement of the Food and Drug Regulations; makes non-marketed drugs available to health professionals for patients when conventional therapies have failed, are not suitable, or are not available; provides Canadians with science-based medical information they need to make informed choices”
Fail, fail, fail fail and fail. To check for those DNA contaminants costs about $100 as I understand it, and takes three days. So HC, whose self described job it is to “assess for safety” etc etc clearly did precisely none of what they describe as being their job without their rose coloured pharma issued blinders on, for a drug that the same government later MANDATED Canadians must have two servings of, in order to travel by anything other than foot and private vehicle!! Ya, not a good. Now keep in mind HC has recently been served with a lawsuit by Dan Hartman for the death of his son, Sean, as a result of his mandated jab. His lawyer is a colleague of my husband’s and we know him quite well. He’s the lawyer that was able to get Sheila Lewis’s lawyers to agree to the (too late for her) “confidential agreement”; the guy is competent and determined, and I’m sure HC’s lawyers have assessed that from his filings. I’ll bet you dollars to donuts they’re orchestrating HC’s response to the contamination issue because it’s sure to come up in this suit;) and the plan is to shift the blame for Sean’s death (which will set precedent for all others who will come behind him) to Pfizer , despite that ultimately in Canada, it was HC’s job to ensure the safety of the jabs, rather than to simply take the word of the manufacturer-we have the media shills for that, right?
Sue HC into the beyond, I say. Don’t fall for the “shift the blame” ruse. Nail them all.
I just saw today that Moderna is ready for clinical trials for their bird flu ‘vax.’ I’m not sure if they’ll receive any blowback from these latest findings - one can only hope.
IMHO, the only reason Health Canada is suddenly and publicly seemingly jumped on the “ antivaxxer “ train is because are squarely aiming to shift the blame that should be on them, to Pfizer: HC’s Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate claims it “reviews scientific information to assess the safety, efficacy, and quality of a prescription drug; assesses the potential benefits and risks of a prescription drug; reviews Clinical Trial Applications (CTAs) for prescription drugs to ensure that the studies are well-designed and that participants will not be exposed to undue risk; monitors the evolving safety of drugs in development through the review of adverse reaction reports that are submitted as a requirement of the Food and Drug Regulations; makes non-marketed drugs available to health professionals for patients when conventional therapies have failed, are not suitable, or are not available; provides Canadians with science-based medical information they need to make informed choices”
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/branches-agencies/health-products-food-branch/therapeutic-products-directorate.html
Fail, fail, fail fail and fail. To check for those DNA contaminants costs about $100 as I understand it, and takes three days. So HC, whose self described job it is to “assess for safety” etc etc clearly did precisely none of what they describe as being their job without their rose coloured pharma issued blinders on, for a drug that the same government later MANDATED Canadians must have two servings of, in order to travel by anything other than foot and private vehicle!! Ya, not a good. Now keep in mind HC has recently been served with a lawsuit by Dan Hartman for the death of his son, Sean, as a result of his mandated jab. His lawyer is a colleague of my husband’s and we know him quite well. He’s the lawyer that was able to get Sheila Lewis’s lawyers to agree to the (too late for her) “confidential agreement”; the guy is competent and determined, and I’m sure HC’s lawyers have assessed that from his filings. I’ll bet you dollars to donuts they’re orchestrating HC’s response to the contamination issue because it’s sure to come up in this suit;) and the plan is to shift the blame for Sean’s death (which will set precedent for all others who will come behind him) to Pfizer , despite that ultimately in Canada, it was HC’s job to ensure the safety of the jabs, rather than to simply take the word of the manufacturer-we have the media shills for that, right?
Sue HC into the beyond, I say. Don’t fall for the “shift the blame” ruse. Nail them all.
I just saw today that Moderna is ready for clinical trials for their bird flu ‘vax.’ I’m not sure if they’ll receive any blowback from these latest findings - one can only hope.