Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Samantha Gluck's avatar

Yep. I’ve also read analyses (by brilliant Substackers) of studies that imply even some who only took the first round could be seriously impaired, but this might not manifest as apparent for a decade or more.

By the way, my husband LOVES the Do Not Comply hat I purchased from you. He has worn it to work everyday since it arrived! 😂😂😂

Expand full comment
zuFpM5*M's avatar

As far as I understand it, that study used partial spike protein which was injected in some known quantity. Some people were trying to minimize the importance of the results by claiming that "it wasn't mRNA anyways;" however, imagine how much worse it would be for mRNA!

The mRNA distributes all over the body, hijacks cells which are destroyed for bonus organ damage, and then produces an unknown quantity of full spike for an unknown length of time deep inside the body!

So where this study had immune system issues manifesting after 4, 5, 6 shots, we might hazard a guess that the mRNA would be much more destructive with fewer shots due to the mass quantity of spike potentially produced.

And that doesn't even get into the lipid nanoparticle toxicity, the partial mRNA producing random proteins or any of the other follow on effects of spike protein accumulation.

EDIT: Oh and I forgot the persistence of mRNA spike is far higher due to the pseudo uridine replacements. So it lasts longer, does damage longer, etc.

Expand full comment
35 more comments...