Using less than a clinically effective dose is a typical trick of NIH. NIH does these "setup-to-fail" research studies to fool Congress, State-Controlled-Media, and others that NIH has "studied this drug and found it to be ineffective." I received $$Millions of NIH funding, and knew how to play their game.
Using less than a clinically effective dose is a typical trick of NIH. NIH does these "setup-to-fail" research studies to fool Congress, State-Controlled-Media, and others that NIH has "studied this drug and found it to be ineffective." I received $$Millions of NIH funding, and knew how to play their game.
Read, What the Nurses Saw! You will learn from the eye-witness accounts and technical information presented in this book, calling the failed COVID protocols тАЬerrorsтАЭ is not accurate, What The Nurses Saw тАФ It was Murder." So live with it!
There is no doubt about it Mick, that they were conspiring to intentionally kill patients. Hospitals were receiving big $ for each covid death, for patients on respirators and all sorts of procedures. For giving out Remdesivir. Like Steve mentioned in his comment, there are invaluable nurses' testimonies out there.
Just my observation but with a day or two of giving the"protocol" remdesivir and steroids, large numbers of patients developed kidney failure and ended up on dialysis, dead or both. I quit ICU as fast as I could and missed most of the"pandemic"
Sorry for the delay in responding to a perfectly reasonable question - I've been overwhelmed by care & related commitments.
It wasn't surgisphere I had in mind, although that was pretty bad, too. There was another, done in the UK early in 2020. I remember reading details at the time & thinking how bad it was. Rather than evaluate claims based on protocols revolving around HCQ such as Didier Raoult's (DR) work, they left treatment until very late in the disease's progress, didn't follow the DR protocol & used that almost predictable outcome to discredit HCQ. Some might think they rigged a trial to get the result they wanted.
I've spent a bit of time trying to find the details that I read 4 years ago but the blogs that linked me to the study seem to have disappeared. At that time, they contained remarks & commentary from people with expertise in the field. I am but a lowly and lapsed engineer with a background in maths, statistics, physics & an overdeveloped sense of curiosity, but something didn't feel right to me from the very beginning. Those blogs made me feel a lot less lonely in my questioning of what we were being told. It was around then that I stopped watching TV & reading newspapers because I'd realised that we were being universally lied to from every quarter.
I haven't been able to go through it all again, but I think this is a link to the paper - or maybe a derivative. I'm not sure if the detail is included. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33031652/ .
There was also some background & references to it on John Ward's (JW) blog at the time. It is amazing how many things have evaporated or been taken down since then. Had I known how bad things were going to get then I should have taken screenshots, kept downloads & so on. But I have had other things to do and it would only have led to me having even more frequent 'Tommy Shelby' moments.
JW did note that "38 people (already very ill with C19) died during the trials, and probably at least 10 of them wouldтАЩve died anyway. But by overdosing and administering far too late in the infection, maybe 25-30 died needlessly. [It] may not have been his fault тАУ but his competence is seriously compromised. He has [not received] so much as a rap across the knuckles."
Using less than a clinically effective dose is a typical trick of NIH. NIH does these "setup-to-fail" research studies to fool Congress, State-Controlled-Media, and others that NIH has "studied this drug and found it to be ineffective." I received $$Millions of NIH funding, and knew how to play their game.
Yup. They also did overdosing, as in the infamous fraudulent report into HCQ effectiveness. They actually killed patients.
Are you suggested pre-meditated murder by 'the Authorities'? Unjabbed Mick (UK).
Read, What the Nurses Saw! You will learn from the eye-witness accounts and technical information presented in this book, calling the failed COVID protocols тАЬerrorsтАЭ is not accurate, What The Nurses Saw тАФ It was Murder." So live with it!
There is no doubt about it Mick, that they were conspiring to intentionally kill patients. Hospitals were receiving big $ for each covid death, for patients on respirators and all sorts of procedures. For giving out Remdesivir. Like Steve mentioned in his comment, there are invaluable nurses' testimonies out there.
Just my observation but with a day or two of giving the"protocol" remdesivir and steroids, large numbers of patients developed kidney failure and ended up on dialysis, dead or both. I quit ICU as fast as I could and missed most of the"pandemic"
I'm sure we're on exactly the same page Monica! Mick.
I assure you they did. I will enter the story on my stack
Is that the surgisphere study?
Sorry for the delay in responding to a perfectly reasonable question - I've been overwhelmed by care & related commitments.
It wasn't surgisphere I had in mind, although that was pretty bad, too. There was another, done in the UK early in 2020. I remember reading details at the time & thinking how bad it was. Rather than evaluate claims based on protocols revolving around HCQ such as Didier Raoult's (DR) work, they left treatment until very late in the disease's progress, didn't follow the DR protocol & used that almost predictable outcome to discredit HCQ. Some might think they rigged a trial to get the result they wanted.
I've spent a bit of time trying to find the details that I read 4 years ago but the blogs that linked me to the study seem to have disappeared. At that time, they contained remarks & commentary from people with expertise in the field. I am but a lowly and lapsed engineer with a background in maths, statistics, physics & an overdeveloped sense of curiosity, but something didn't feel right to me from the very beginning. Those blogs made me feel a lot less lonely in my questioning of what we were being told. It was around then that I stopped watching TV & reading newspapers because I'd realised that we were being universally lied to from every quarter.
I haven't been able to go through it all again, but I think this is a link to the paper - or maybe a derivative. I'm not sure if the detail is included. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33031652/ .
There was also some background & references to it on John Ward's (JW) blog at the time. It is amazing how many things have evaporated or been taken down since then. Had I known how bad things were going to get then I should have taken screenshots, kept downloads & so on. But I have had other things to do and it would only have led to me having even more frequent 'Tommy Shelby' moments.
JW did note that "38 people (already very ill with C19) died during the trials, and probably at least 10 of them wouldтАЩve died anyway. But by overdosing and administering far too late in the infection, maybe 25-30 died needlessly. [It] may not have been his fault тАУ but his competence is seriously compromised. He has [not received] so much as a rap across the knuckles."
https://therealslog.com/2020/11/28/all-over-the-place/
https://therealslog.com/2020/05/11/exclusive-andrew-marr-professor-peter-horby-mark-zuckerberg-and-the-internationalist-hard-left/
https://therealslog.com/2020/09/29/vurusecrecy-exclusive-hcq-being-stockpiled-as-horby-ploughs-ahead-unpunished/
Thank you for your response, it is very informative.