There is NO IMMUNITY for Willful and Malicious implementation of a Genocide Program.
I find it Ironic and Arrogant, that the FDA aka "The Perpetrator" now considers themselves Legitimate to claim and now Invokes 'Sovereign Immunity'. Their Moral Compass is Broken...
Accountability is Required for all who created this Pox Upon Humanity....
There is NO IMMUNITY for Willful and Malicious implementation of a Genocide Program.
I find it Ironic and Arrogant, that the FDA aka "The Perpetrator" now considers themselves Legitimate to claim and now Invokes 'Sovereign Immunity'. Their Moral Compass is Broken...
Accountability is Required for all who created this Pox Upon Humanity....
THE FDA CREATED A FEDERAL CORPORATION AND BASED ON CORPORATE LAW WHEN A GOVERNMENT ENTITY INCORPORATES THEY LOSE THEIR CLAIM OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY! AM SURE NEW LAWYERS AND THOSE GRADUATIONS AFTER 2000 HAVE NOT BEEN TAUGHT THE LOSS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY INCORPORATING! MUNICIPALITIES FOUND OUT AND IS THE REASON THEY PURCHASE LIABILITY INSURANCE TO CYA!
Their sovereign immunity is from the UN and they do not have it with respect to the general population. They operate under the laws of the sea as an agency of the UN. They have a very limited jurisdiction and this is their Achilles Heel.
IN A GREAT SENSE YOU ARE CORRECT, BUT ONLY WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND STATES THAT IMPLEMENTED UN INITIATIVES! SEVERAL YEARS AGO A MAJORITY OF STATES SIGNED ON TO A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT REITERATING THE STATEтАЩS SOVEREIGNTY AS PER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES BILL OF RIGHTS! THE LINK IS ACCESSIBLE IF YOU WILL RESEARCH. THERE WERE OVER 31 STATES DECLARING SOVEREIGNTY PER THE DOCUMENT.
There is NO IMMUNITY for Willful and Malicious implementation of a Genocide Program.
I find it Ironic and Arrogant, that the FDA aka "The Perpetrator" now considers themselves Legitimate to claim and now Invokes 'Sovereign Immunity'. Their Moral Compass is Broken...
Accountability is Required for all who created this Pox Upon Humanity....
THE FDA CREATED A FEDERAL CORPORATION AND BASED ON CORPORATE LAW WHEN A GOVERNMENT ENTITY INCORPORATES THEY LOSE THEIR CLAIM OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY! AM SURE NEW LAWYERS AND THOSE GRADUATIONS AFTER 2000 HAVE NOT BEEN TAUGHT THE LOSS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY INCORPORATING! MUNICIPALITIES FOUND OUT AND IS THE REASON THEY PURCHASE LIABILITY INSURANCE TO CYA!
Well Done!
Thank You!
Carpe Diem...
Their sovereign immunity is from the UN and they do not have it with respect to the general population. They operate under the laws of the sea as an agency of the UN. They have a very limited jurisdiction and this is their Achilles Heel.
IN A GREAT SENSE YOU ARE CORRECT, BUT ONLY WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND STATES THAT IMPLEMENTED UN INITIATIVES! SEVERAL YEARS AGO A MAJORITY OF STATES SIGNED ON TO A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT REITERATING THE STATEтАЩS SOVEREIGNTY AS PER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES BILL OF RIGHTS! THE LINK IS ACCESSIBLE IF YOU WILL RESEARCH. THERE WERE OVER 31 STATES DECLARING SOVEREIGNTY PER THE DOCUMENT.