You are incorrect, the actual isolating and sequencing of a virus has nothing to do with the PCR test. Would you like me to give you a step by step procedure on how to isolate and sequence a virus? I have not done it in decades but not much has changed.
You are incorrect, the actual isolating and sequencing of a virus has nothing to do with the PCR test. Would you like me to give you a step by step procedure on how to isolate and sequence a virus? I have not done it in decades but not much has changed.
Sorry, but you're incorrect as well. We are talking past each other. I'll stick to engineering where at least we can prove our claims with real-world results. Best wishes to you on your journey to the truth.
Taking a solution from a patient running it through a centrifuge scooping out the top layer (the supernatant) and then culturing it and detecting viral plaques in a petri dish and taking this material and running it through a gel to sequence is "as real world" as it gets and has ZERO to do with the fraudulent PCR tests that you refer to.
When you find this same sequence in a group of similarly symptomatic patients who ALSO show viral RNA at LOW cycle rates then you likely have a virus according to the Bradford Hill postulates.
Please tell me where I am "incorrect". If you have new knowledge to offer the scientists who published this paper who by the way were among the first to promote Ivermectin Zinc and zpack for early treatment I am sure they would welcome your input.
You are incorrect, the actual isolating and sequencing of a virus has nothing to do with the PCR test. Would you like me to give you a step by step procedure on how to isolate and sequence a virus? I have not done it in decades but not much has changed.
Sorry, but you're incorrect as well. We are talking past each other. I'll stick to engineering where at least we can prove our claims with real-world results. Best wishes to you on your journey to the truth.
Taking a solution from a patient running it through a centrifuge scooping out the top layer (the supernatant) and then culturing it and detecting viral plaques in a petri dish and taking this material and running it through a gel to sequence is "as real world" as it gets and has ZERO to do with the fraudulent PCR tests that you refer to.
When you find this same sequence in a group of similarly symptomatic patients who ALSO show viral RNA at LOW cycle rates then you likely have a virus according to the Bradford Hill postulates.
Please tell me where I am "incorrect". If you have new knowledge to offer the scientists who published this paper who by the way were among the first to promote Ivermectin Zinc and zpack for early treatment I am sure they would welcome your input.