5 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Is the potential damage to DNA the same for the Phizer and AZ shots. We hear everything about Phizer and Moderna but very little about AZ anymore. Many people in BC took AZ early on when we were told it was “safe” for a certain age group (I believe mid 50’s to early 60’s). Many got one AZ and then took a PZ or Mod for their second as the “science changed”within one month which showed that was “safe to mix and match” (though I do not believe there was ever any trials done to validate this claim). Is there anything g known about those who took only 2 AZ and no more shots or are long term studies not being done at all since it seems most of the original group is corrupted by mix match policy?

Expand full comment

AZ is an adenovirus, so it has dna and doesn't need reverse transcription. however if someone has had lots of adenovirus infections before their pre existing antibodies might stop the az shot before it does permanent dna damage.

Expand full comment

The AZ vaccine is based on an adenovirus carrier and this technology has been used before. Have we seen problems with previous adenovirus vaccines?

Also mRNA products use LNP which alllw wide distribution and penetration into cells.

The article is not clear if the same issues were detected with the AZ vaccine. It is important to know for quite a few people.

Expand full comment

Also, the mRNA jabs used pseudouridine which continues the production of the spike protein.

Millions took the J&J and Astrazeneca. When will these be properly studied?

Expand full comment

I agree and this article did mention the use of AZ-vaccine in study, but then did not mention it again. So a bit unclear.

Expand full comment