I want to stand back a bit and exam how very wrong this entire edict is. This bills very existence shows the depths of the collective ignorance or stupidity of its authors regarding the science of respiratory illness. First, the bill was built on the false assumption that it was the unvaccinated who were the culprits in spreading this re…
I want to stand back a bit and exam how very wrong this entire edict is. This bills very existence shows the depths of the collective ignorance or stupidity of its authors regarding the science of respiratory illness. First, the bill was built on the false assumption that it was the unvaccinated who were the culprits in spreading this respiratory illness when, in fact, time and the careful analysis by many scientists and statisticians from real world wide data has shown us that it is the fully vaccinated whose immune systems that have been suppressed by the vaccines that are the ones not only getting the virus over and over but are the major spreaders of it. Secondly, no matter how much the population is immunized the virus mutates quickly not only because it is a corona virus, but the immune pressure placed against the virus by repeated injections causes immune escape. It is impossible to achieve herd immunity against a virus that has both an animal and human reservoir. This ruling also shows the corruption of the legal system that fails to look beyond the thin argument that no one has been harmed yet. No one has been harmed yet because the bill hasn't been enacted due to it being mired in the appeals process. It is not yet law. One only has to look at the potential for harm if the bill were enacted - res ipsa loquitor. This was a purely political decision that was rendered to punish the unvaccinated who are now proven to be the healthiest ones in the world.
200% agreed! Or you can say the coronavirus virus which Dr. Gold tells us "No novel coronavirus has been has found in twenty years." So CV-19=0 Any mutations also =0. Were this math (I'm terrible at the subject) anything vaguely referring to CV-19=0. And yes those unvaxxed are the healthy ones.
I want to stand back a bit and exam how very wrong this entire edict is. This bills very existence shows the depths of the collective ignorance or stupidity of its authors regarding the science of respiratory illness. First, the bill was built on the false assumption that it was the unvaccinated who were the culprits in spreading this respiratory illness when, in fact, time and the careful analysis by many scientists and statisticians from real world wide data has shown us that it is the fully vaccinated whose immune systems that have been suppressed by the vaccines that are the ones not only getting the virus over and over but are the major spreaders of it. Secondly, no matter how much the population is immunized the virus mutates quickly not only because it is a corona virus, but the immune pressure placed against the virus by repeated injections causes immune escape. It is impossible to achieve herd immunity against a virus that has both an animal and human reservoir. This ruling also shows the corruption of the legal system that fails to look beyond the thin argument that no one has been harmed yet. No one has been harmed yet because the bill hasn't been enacted due to it being mired in the appeals process. It is not yet law. One only has to look at the potential for harm if the bill were enacted - res ipsa loquitor. This was a purely political decision that was rendered to punish the unvaccinated who are now proven to be the healthiest ones in the world.
200% agreed! Or you can say the coronavirus virus which Dr. Gold tells us "No novel coronavirus has been has found in twenty years." So CV-19=0 Any mutations also =0. Were this math (I'm terrible at the subject) anything vaguely referring to CV-19=0. And yes those unvaxxed are the healthy ones.