This was my thought as well. The opposition against IVM was WAY over the top, the smearing, the "you are not a horse, y'all" FDA tweet nonsense, the denial of IVM scripts at corporate pharmacies, it was truly bizarro world. It is a nobel-prize winning medicine with a proven safety profile!
If broadly used back then, the data today may sho…
This was my thought as well. The opposition against IVM was WAY over the top, the smearing, the "you are not a horse, y'all" FDA tweet nonsense, the denial of IVM scripts at corporate pharmacies, it was truly bizarro world. It is a nobel-prize winning medicine with a proven safety profile!
If broadly used back then, the data today may show a meaningful decrease in cancer episodes, we can't have that!! What about the "healthcare" money train!? Oh no!
I wonder how fast this study will be memory-holed, or how its authors will be smeared (again), or what other diabolical nonsense will be used to turn people away from this treatment option.
This was my thought as well. The opposition against IVM was WAY over the top, the smearing, the "you are not a horse, y'all" FDA tweet nonsense, the denial of IVM scripts at corporate pharmacies, it was truly bizarro world. It is a nobel-prize winning medicine with a proven safety profile!
If broadly used back then, the data today may show a meaningful decrease in cancer episodes, we can't have that!! What about the "healthcare" money train!? Oh no!
I wonder how fast this study will be memory-holed, or how its authors will be smeared (again), or what other diabolical nonsense will be used to turn people away from this treatment option.