Maybe Barnes is a strict legal thinker. Ascribing motive is difficult and doing it in the biggest crime in history and when he's not a prosecutor, and when it's likely the real truth is top secret, might be ridiculous. He's trying to win cases not become an alt. narrative super star. Though he could be a freemason so he could be conning …
Maybe Barnes is a strict legal thinker. Ascribing motive is difficult and doing it in the biggest crime in history and when he's not a prosecutor, and when it's likely the real truth is top secret, might be ridiculous. He's trying to win cases not become an alt. narrative super star. Though he could be a freemason so he could be conning us. Katherine writes her stuff and consults with lawyer but I'll bet that any legal documents that get filled will sound a lot more tame. My understanding is if you go in making the accusations that Katherine does you'll never be heard. Which is not to say she isn't correct.
Maybe Barnes is a strict legal thinker. Ascribing motive is difficult and doing it in the biggest crime in history and when he's not a prosecutor, and when it's likely the real truth is top secret, might be ridiculous. He's trying to win cases not become an alt. narrative super star. Though he could be a freemason so he could be conning us. Katherine writes her stuff and consults with lawyer but I'll bet that any legal documents that get filled will sound a lot more tame. My understanding is if you go in making the accusations that Katherine does you'll never be heard. Which is not to say she isn't correct.