JK it gets worse and worse. Chief dirty justice Roberts just came out in support of Boasberg. However, it will not be a mystery as to why if you read the following (which should be shared planetwide). Excerpt from link at the bottom with small enhancements:
"Trump's call to remove Boasberg - the chief judge of the federal district court i…
JK it gets worse and worse. Chief dirty justice Roberts just came out in support of Boasberg. However, it will not be a mystery as to why if you read the following (which should be shared planetwide). Excerpt from link at the bottom with small enhancements:
"Trump's call to remove Boasberg - the chief judge of the federal district court in Washington DC, marks the first time that he's asked Congress to seek a judge's removal. Trump also suggested that "many" of the judges who have ruled against him in other cases should be impeached as well.
Then, hours later, Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back - saying in a rare statement that it would be inappropriate to impeach a judge.
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said Tuesday.
Of course, that would be up to Congress - WOULDNT IT?
As TheLastRefuge notes on X, Roberts and Boasberg go way back...
"Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg, who --
Wait for it......
****Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC****
- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC."
**ahem** Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts.
Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when… https://t.co/NdMc6VsUr0
JK it gets worse and worse. Chief dirty justice Roberts just came out in support of Boasberg. However, it will not be a mystery as to why if you read the following (which should be shared planetwide). Excerpt from link at the bottom with small enhancements:
"Trump's call to remove Boasberg - the chief judge of the federal district court in Washington DC, marks the first time that he's asked Congress to seek a judge's removal. Trump also suggested that "many" of the judges who have ruled against him in other cases should be impeached as well.
Then, hours later, Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back - saying in a rare statement that it would be inappropriate to impeach a judge.
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said Tuesday.
Of course, that would be up to Congress - WOULDNT IT?
As TheLastRefuge notes on X, Roberts and Boasberg go way back...
"Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg, who --
Wait for it......
****Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC****
- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC."
**ahem** Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts.
Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when… https://t.co/NdMc6VsUr0
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) March 18, 2025"
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scotus-chief-justice-issues-rare-statement-says-impeaching-activist-judges-not