I watched that interview with Tucker. He clearly stated that he had it all wrong. I saw nothing in the interview where he exposed himself as a junk science peddler and a biowarfare totalitarian. He recognized he had it wrong and now holds views not much different from your own.
I watched that interview with Tucker. He clearly stated that he had it all wrong. I saw nothing in the interview where he exposed himself as a junk science peddler and a biowarfare totalitarian. He recognized he had it wrong and now holds views not much different from your own.
Weinstein spewed that crap in 2022. Not early or mid-2020. 2022. More than two years in and this highly edu-macated genius is saying lockdowns should have been harder, more severe? You understand that "locking down" free people is a crime, yes???????????????????????????????
I scarcely knew of Weinstein; I think I might have heard of him...and then saw the podcast with Malone and Kirsch. Other than that, I paid him no attention really. I did give him props for protesting the "day of absence" at the college where he formerly taught.
So, to have him pop back up with this evidence of...of this garbage from 2022? Yet another genius, yet another ex spurt espousing criminal nonsense.
One way to identify them is to see who their fellow travelers are. So Malone was a shill but I thought Kirsch was legit despite often being seen with him. But Kirsch turned out to be the biggest shill of all. Kirsch actually owns the company working on microdot so they can brand us biologically at the cellular level.
You will see these mutual admiration societies of all these people who are all a little too glib, polished and jovial standing in a big circle and pointing to their right and saying "This guy is telling the truth." They all have a daisy chain of shill recommendations.
People who are real are rough around the edges. Anybody would have to be after they have recognized the worldwide plan to exterminate most of mankind and enslave the remainder at the level of animals in a barn. They'd never be a slick guy like Robert Malone with broad smiles who by the way! - You won't believe it! - Used to work for PFizer! Wow, the planning goes back thirty years but this guy Malone never suspected anything.
So in the future anybody associated with Malone or Kirsch is definitely a new shill. People have no idea how far a trillion dollars will go. They could hire everybody on earth as a shill except for you and me with that kind of money.
P.S. Automatically assume anybody who defends people like Malone or Kirsch are themselves shills ... especially when they say things like "Does it even matter? In a hegelian dialectic of Kafka brain methane we can assume that E=MC2 blah blah blah ..."
If Trump is the ultimate plant, the ultimate double, I think everybody better finish their bunker as soon as they can. I have not made up my mind yet.
Remember, he's not Galactus. He's one man and they've made it obvious they can lock him away for nothing. His popular support has prevented them from doing that yet. We'll see soon if he is the real thing. I'm strapped for either outcome.
I am keeping an open-mind. It has been quite a show, and he gets a TON of daily press for about 9 straight years now. That itself is suspicious since we know that media is highly controlled. If they didn't want us to see him, they'd ignore him. But he's even on CNN. That, and he thinks these vaccines are "miracles" and have saved millions of lives.
Yes, they've made it obvious that they can lock him up-----but they haven't. He keeps rising to the top and the accusations seem to just fade away--like a good ol' American hero story!
I feel a another grift coming on. He may very well be one of them--honestly how could he NOT be? Anyone who refuses to entertain the idea has not yet fully understood the power of the people running the show.
Most people I know refuse to believe this. Like I said, I am keeping an open mind--what choice do I have?
Yes, there are no real borders anymore--just money. And yes--all of those things! It makes no sense. Trump outed Clinton as a "nice guy but going to be in trouble because of Epstein" in 2015. 2105! Before he was even elected. That was 9 YEARS ago, and they 're still churning the same non-news about that island. "It's coming!" But it never comes.
I watched the interview with Weinstein just a few days ago. We are now two years away from 2022 and much has changed since then. My comment still stands. Go watch his most recent interview with Tucker. He does not the person that "the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World" describes. It makes me wonder what is his purpose for taking so much time and effort to discredit Weinstein. Yes he was a lefty liberal and probably still is a liberal. But he also has a core nature that causes him to stand up for truth regardless of how controversial it might be. Go check out what happened to him at Evergreen College.
Anyone allowed on Tucker is a Deep State liar. Anyone who believed in Covid should never be listened to again, it was such an obvious scam, all one had to do, even in early March was notice that Neil Fergeson was the one who did the modelling. He has a long history of lying and he was responsible for the lockdowns and all the tyrannical measures. Then in April, he got caught having a married woman come over to his house for sex. That shows he knew there was nothing to be afraid of. Then in May the CDC came out and said the Covid had a survival rate of 99.94%. I could go on forever. These people didn't want to see the truth because the truth wasn't profitable until this past year. Now they all change their tune according to where the money is.
Not true. In that interview he mentioned more than once that this technology is brilliant and has a lot of potential. ThatтАЩs the message they want to send: тАЬyeah we messed up but next time it will be great!тАЭ
I didn't see it that way at all. I saw it as "Here's a fabulous new vaccine delivery system, because fat-encapsulation allows it to go everywhere, and it can be re-programmed so quickly, rather than the years taken to otherwise create a vaccine." That's revolutionary in terms of anti-virus delivery systems. (That's the biologist in him speaking.) But Robert Malone spoke of it having real negative impacts, particularly in bypassing the body's normal immunological response pathways - he of the "nuclear bomb in your body" analogy.
Can it be abused horribly? YES! Imagine you turn your back and someone's swapped in a toxic poison.
Wait. They've already done that.
But they can do it again and again, very easily. I think they're losing the battle on anybody taking needles in arms anymore in any scale. They'll have to find alternatives via air/food/water deliver systems.
But here's the kicker... The people setting this stuff off, have to ensure they're not killed themselves by whatever delivery system they choose. Or not in proximity to those who have been "infected". And yes, I'm aware our own (US) government has experimented a few times on aerosol delivery systems for infectious diseases. (subway tunnels, a weeklong(?) experiment in SF - possibly a hallucinogenic?, and others. There are documents that explain the best place to put a bioweapon - on choke points such as escalators, bus entry/exit points, etc. Where people HAVE to go through.
But back to your point, Yes, he took a more rabid stance early on, but he's mentioned a number of times that he and Heather have changed their minds, and even explained how that happened. From a biologist point of view, yes, locking everyone down hard DOES make sense because you DO burn through the infection, build up antibodies and it doesn't spread. But that's impossible to do. "Yo, military folks. Just.. just take the next 6 weeks off." For developing silicon wafers, you bake them at high temps, depositing layers for a few weeks. Who would provide chemicals for water filtration, and food for everyone? Toilet paper deliveries are ESSENTIAL!
Yes, his initial point was reactionary, strictly biological and completely impractical.
But he's changed his mind, quite openly. And for some reason that's a sin?
We need to get past this issue people have (those "gotcha moments").
We make mistakes. We learn, we change. We adapt.
This adherence to perfection and conformity is killing us collectively.
And if Viruses don't exist, all viral vaccines are completely unnecessary. We've been scammed. According to the old Guinea-Bissau Study, only the Bacterial ones are of ANY VALUE. The rest are sloppily made, and do more net harm than good. Bye bye 1.25 Billion dollar market for FARMA.
I'm sure viruses were found at some point that led to the vaccine industry, but admittedly I don't have all the answers about that. I wholeheartedly agree that Big Phfarma shot themselves in the foot big time with all this, and they deserve to be punished - financially, reputationally, legally and any other adverb that someone can come up with. :-)
RFK was talking about the mRNA animal trials in spring 2020, none of the trials in mRNA every made it to humans until the covid ones in Jan2020. The official story is using a "Sequencing" of the "virus" that was received from the Chinese Government, the Moderna people said that got that sequence and had the Covid vaxx ready for trials in 6 days. Amazing how much moderna, pfizer, the FDA, CDC, The US military, congress, white house, every major religious leader, even major corporation, every show in Hollywood and Bret Weinstein all trusted the Chinese Government that much.
ALso, the Chinese sequence first published from the Pangolin virus was bogus and not even related to what we can harvest from COVID. And yet they still believed the later ones.
Hes compromised (I doubt it) or a useful idiot. So blinded to which is friend and whichis enemy that he makes the exact opposite call. I suspect he will be folded into the New Synthesis forming in anticipation of stealing Trumps fire, if Trump wins; you can just feed Bret information and he will panic and spurt out a "scholarly response". At times he will take a unique, genuine, contrarian view, which keeps his street cred alive.
you see this alot with the exlibs, like Lindsay (actually still a lib); they can parse the treees and miss the forest because forests are bad, or ALex Jones believes in forests etc.
Whenever he speaks with NRx or religious he does this distancing plus kumbayah thing that is creepy and bigoted underneath; "i didnt USUALLy used to have conversations with XYZ....but (insert dire contingency here) etc." I can barely stand it.
You're right! But I am so captured by my government's omnipotence and know they are just here to help, nay, save! me. So why would I ever question this?! It's kind of like how Bill Gates knew covid was coming. He's so smart, I wish I were that smart.
yup. It's like McCullough doing the 180 on mRNA tech. "Well it may be a great delivery platform in the near future. " -- something to this effect. 100% bs
Very subtle---keeping the idea alive because the one thing that simply cannot happen is that people start thinking vaccines in general are poison and have been a human experiment/control mechanism since day one.
The lipid encapsulation IS a great delivery mechanism. For good and for bad. It's not the encapsulation that is bad, it's the payload that makes the difference.
And what the intent of the payload is for.
At this point, I'm hoping there's enough liability protection for me so that anybody doing things for bad reasons will be sued out of existence.
That's where *I'd* spend a lot of time looking is in incremental or fast-moving legislation that absolves drug companies of penalties in non-EUA use cases.
But they can kill 1 company with suing, and rehire Most the Engineers and Execs and start a new company. Repeat. Moderna, still hasn't produced 1 Approved product non-EUA for public consumption.
I would hope that investors would recognize the track record of the execs to give them a wide berth and not reward such folks. And engineers can also choose whether they want to live with themselves for contributing to products that kill/maim. I think there are more good people than bad. And it gets increasingly hard to have bad triumph when good people won't have anything to do with them.
I don't want to come across as offensive in saying this, but you're doing a lot of projecting here about Bret's intent. He admits he made mistakes in following the narrative. I don't believe in hard lockdowns, but can see how someone with some knowledge about the life cycle of viral infections might think it's appropriate - I wasn't accepting of it, just throwing out a hypothesis.
I agree that there were many who spoke up early. Where are they now? Did they get tired and let others carry the torch? Were they threatened in their livelihood? Are they dead? Where are they? I honestly can't remember who they are, because my own analysis of data as I came across it led me to believe it was a scam. I also was educated several decades ago, and even my own brain knew that masks don't stop viruses. That's basic (to me) knowledge. And totally undercut the purposes for which it was purported to be in place for.
To me, my earliest recollection is Pierre Kory, and he's associated with FLCCC.net now, and still making appearances.
Many have joined the battle, and that doesn't negate the contributions of the OG's. ;-)
Bret's been fighting this for 2 years, so I'm not sure of the basis for 4 years. Keep in mind that censorship was in full-blown effect. Everyone was (and in some cases still are) tapdancing around the word, substituting other words, etc. just to stay on youtube and other platforms.
For each and every person who you suspect might be wrong, I say this: Nobody can take their integrity away. They have to give/throw it away.
What we do with it is our business. But we also need to be willing to forgive someone who's making an honest effort to rectify their wrongs. For them, it's a long haul effort to regain trust/credibility. That's part of the consequences for prior actions.
Well, I look at it like the CIA info presented to the Church Committee in congress. The CIA gave the committee what the CIA wanted them to see.
And that's what we're dealing with. But I refuse to believe that any one person (or any persons) can eliminate the truth completely. Sure, it can obfuscate the players and motives, but truth is truth. And while we can see outside the matrix, we should resist all avenues/efforts made to stuff us into it.
You're right, psyops are complicated. As long as the desired outcome is achieved, it doesn't really matter how it's done and to a lesser degree who is destroyed. Unless they're useful for other psyops, or to let them know their back is covered when things get rough.
As long as there's plausible deniability for anything, we're not going to get to the truth in that direction. People can change allegiances for all kinds of reasons, and as long as they're afraid of the disclosure of the alliance, disclosure of embarrassing information, or death of themselves or other loved ones, we're going to keep guessing.
All these dark games. Isn't the simple truth and honesty a much more desireable way to conduct ourselves?
Oh the tangled webs we weave, when we first seek to deceive.
Also, we can play 6 Degrees of separation from Peter Thiel. Here it takes 2 Degree. Bret Weinstein -> Eric Weinstein -> Peter. For the Intel Connection to Companies and Silicon (I call it Silly-Con) Valley, please review RFK jr.'s book "Real Anthony Fauci," 2021. Although the book leaves out a lot of key info, still calls covy a Pandemic (it's not), Whitwashes some key players. it gives you a decent picture. Read the last Chapter "Germ Games" (about 45 pages) and you'd be better up to speed on the Intel side of things. I don't have any more time, but good luck.
I'm about 4 degrees of separation from someone in Bill Gates' financial world. My wife tells me to NOT get involved with political/biologic stuff with this person. I have to leave the room, because I'm dying to ask tons of questions, but I also don't want to jeopardize their job. They're very intelligent, and I presume they're doing things honestly without a lot of knowledge of some of the darker areas attributed to Gates. (I don't know them at all. Just have put pieces together from conversations over the years.)
I'm sure Gates compartmentalizes a lot of areas too. Loose lips sink ships.
I think observing that a technology is clever (or "brilliant") and has a lot of potential is not the same as endorsing it as ready for prime time. The jury may still be out on the "potential" of this technology, if any. Fusion as a power source has a lot of potential, but that may be as far as it ever goes--it's always another 20 years.
Right now, one of the primary issues is holding accountable all the people that forced a clearly experimental product on the world without proper trials or testing, and (worse yet) then lying about it as its faults became manifest instead of admitting they had made a horrible mistake.
It could be different but it wasnтАЩt - he made sure to say it more than once. It was deliberate.
And no тАЬmistakesтАЭ were made. Are you new to this!?! This was all 100% deliberate and planned years in advance. It was designed to cripple entire populations. Mistakes!?! Sheesh.
I don't think anybody is believing that it's a mistake. Too much evidence shows it was planned for years, and patents back that up.
Is it possible for well-meaning people to play their part without knowledge that their role contributed to a disaster? Yes. I wonder how many people who administered shots are feeling guilt for delivering a poison. Or took it, not knowing that they'd be walking spike factories and transfer it to their loved ones around them?
The criminals are the ones who knew, and said nothing. And they should be tracked down and prosecuted for crimes against humanity, including murder - with full intent to kill.
"Is it possible for well-meaning people to play their part without knowledge that their role contributed to a disaster?" No--not at this level. The brainwashed nurse or pharmacist, sure.
Exactly, and many like RFK are threatening new pandemics by saying it will be another "Lab Leak" there was never a Covid in the first place and all these people would know that if they were legitimate. They are all playing a role, they are all out for profit.
I saw the articles on Sage Hana and on "Conspiracy ...something..." crossposted by Sage Hana. She made a compelling argument against Bret Weistein, and also bagged in Peter McCullough in one of the articles. I almost did not watch this whole interview, but then I thought "Well, Dr. William Makis recommended it, so I will watch this to see what it looks like. Clearly to people have a very different view on this. I makes sense that Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson would be doing some kind of psyop piece." For me this was Dr. Makis recommendation vs. Sage Hana. Looking through the filter of Sage Hana et al. at the beginning of the interview I was very sceptical of what Mr. Weinstein was saying. Luckily, I decided to stay through the course.
We can perhaps agree that regardless of how it is used, the mRNA techonology is a pretty amazing technology. Yet, just because it is amazing, and like Mr. Weinstein asserts, we should not be using it as an any kind of vaccine. (See an interesting article with links to FDA pre-c19, when they considered an mRNA technology gene therapy not a vaccine. And, if I understood correctly, they still required more research before approving it : https://open.substack.com/pub/tomrenz/p/covered-up-mrna-shedding-transmissibility? )
And, here is my point. If that interview interview of Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson was a psyop, I was absolutely had. I am now really convinced of their sincere commitmment to humanity. And, what I saw was the opposite of what "Sage Hana et al." commented. That seemed to be an all out unfounded attack on Bret Weinstein. My question is, why would you do that? Why, indeed?
I concluded that this is one of the best interviews I have ever seen. Dr. William Makis recommendation was good, and his credibility in my eyes has increased. Whereas, I realized that I did not know who "Sage Hana" is or how I had subcribed to her substack. Interesting. So, I no longer am.
So, If you have not watched it yet, please watch the WHOLE interview before making up your mind on this Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson interview. I think it is highly informative and perhaps "too informative" and "too thought proviking" to have such attempts to prevent people from seeing it. It seemed that this was the purpose of Sahe Hana, to prevent me from seeing this brilliant interview. This was her "hill", her "battle", her "moment of truth". And, I assert that if you watch this interview in whole, your view if Saga Hana is likely change. And, if you do not watch it, then what can you contibute here except a recycled opinion of another who may not deaerve your trust.
Thank you for being part of the conversation. I thank Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carson for this monumental interview. and, I hope you watch it too. Thank you.
Many years ago, I asked a very special young person, who was about to join the Marines, about his thoughts on Colin Kaepernuck taking a knee during the national anthem. I thought it was unacceptable and unpatriotic. He said, "I may not agree with it, but I agree that it is his right to do that. I am joining the Marines for this very reason, to defend his right, and everybody's, right to do that in our country."
Tucker wears a red bracelet. Everything he does is intentional. Everything. The time to reveal the damage is now. All according to the script. The Great Awakening is the real NWO, the false light. If it were possible even the elect will be deceived
The whole тАЬwho is good, who is badтАЭ debates are just absolutely exhausting at this point. Do none of you understand that? How ridiculous this has become? All the so-called Patriots endlessly debating who is on whose side? ItтАЩs directing energy away from the real work that needs to be done.
This is your contribution to the peril we find ourselves in?
And according to the тАЬawakeтАЭ community, and depending on whose blog you are reading, there, according to all of you, is actually no one speaking up for mankindтАФnot Trump, Tucker, Vivek, RFK Jr., McCullough, MaloneтАФno one is тАЬreal.тАЭ No one is helpful! No one is honest! There is literally an argument against anyone and everyone who is standing up. Name ONE person of note who has not been pointed to as a clown, a traitor, an agent of Mossad, a CIA asset.
What are the odds there are only 1000 good people in the world and the rest of the world has been blackmailed, bribed or forced to go along with murdering the worldтАЩs population and enslaving the others who didnтАЩt die in the first few rounds? And all to get a piece of that trillion dollars?
What are the odds that before 2016 there was no one of real moral value whatsoever? That few really cared about the future of their family, their grandchildren, the legacy of their professional work, the future of humanity?
IтАЩm tired of it. Tired of the smugness, the тАЬI know everythingтАЭ people making lists of the liars and the clowns, which on a long enough timeline, seems to be just about everyone with a voice?
We are as divided as the ignorant masses, but instead of arguing about racism and the Ukraine, we spend our time debating names.
ItтАЩs reprehensible.
We have real work to do. I suggest we all get busy and do something. I see more sweat equity coming from the less intellectual corners of the truth movement than I do here on Substack, where supposedly the big minds have come to ponder our fate and research the methods theyтАЩre using for our extraction from life. The salt of the earth folks are running for offices and standing up to school boards and supporting local candidates. ThatтАЩs where IтАЩm putting my faith.
Thank you, Andrea. Like I said, this is where тАЬtheyтАЭ got me and likely many other people. I was not a super fan of either man, however this interview was truly special. Did you watch the whole interview?
Anyone who believed in Covid should never be listened to again, it was such an obvious scam, all one had to do, even in early March was notice that Neil Fergeson was the one who did the modelling. He has a long history of lying and he was responsible for the lockdowns and all the tyrannical measures. Then in April, he got caught having a married woman come over to his house for sex. That shows he knew there was nothing to be afraid of. Then in May the CDC came out and said the Covid had a survival rate of 99.94%. I could go on forever. These people didn't want to see the truth because the truth wasn't profitable until this past year. Now they all change their tune according to where the money is.
I watched that interview with Tucker. He clearly stated that he had it all wrong. I saw nothing in the interview where he exposed himself as a junk science peddler and a biowarfare totalitarian. He recognized he had it wrong and now holds views not much different from your own.
Weinstein spewed that crap in 2022. Not early or mid-2020. 2022. More than two years in and this highly edu-macated genius is saying lockdowns should have been harder, more severe? You understand that "locking down" free people is a crime, yes???????????????????????????????
Weinstein will be fired out of a klown kannon into the Potomac at the Trump Inauguration in full makeup.
He's a dirty deep state shill. If you have not figured it out yet you never will.
Whether or not Trump is a shill has yet to be confirmed for certain.
The Father of the Vaccine.
Adored in Israel.
He will come in his own name and he you will receive.
Texas Arcane, when you say "you" have not figured it out, do you mean the rhetorical you or do you mean me?
Rhetorical. Wasn't directed at you specifically. You seem to have figured it out a long time ago.
I find it difficult that somebody can broadcast shill as loud as Bret Weinstein does and people will still desperately try to assume he is legit.
Thanks, Texas Arcane.
I scarcely knew of Weinstein; I think I might have heard of him...and then saw the podcast with Malone and Kirsch. Other than that, I paid him no attention really. I did give him props for protesting the "day of absence" at the college where he formerly taught.
So, to have him pop back up with this evidence of...of this garbage from 2022? Yet another genius, yet another ex spurt espousing criminal nonsense.
I really struggle some days, Texas Arcane.
One way to identify them is to see who their fellow travelers are. So Malone was a shill but I thought Kirsch was legit despite often being seen with him. But Kirsch turned out to be the biggest shill of all. Kirsch actually owns the company working on microdot so they can brand us biologically at the cellular level.
You will see these mutual admiration societies of all these people who are all a little too glib, polished and jovial standing in a big circle and pointing to their right and saying "This guy is telling the truth." They all have a daisy chain of shill recommendations.
People who are real are rough around the edges. Anybody would have to be after they have recognized the worldwide plan to exterminate most of mankind and enslave the remainder at the level of animals in a barn. They'd never be a slick guy like Robert Malone with broad smiles who by the way! - You won't believe it! - Used to work for PFizer! Wow, the planning goes back thirty years but this guy Malone never suspected anything.
So in the future anybody associated with Malone or Kirsch is definitely a new shill. People have no idea how far a trillion dollars will go. They could hire everybody on earth as a shill except for you and me with that kind of money.
P.S. Automatically assume anybody who defends people like Malone or Kirsch are themselves shills ... especially when they say things like "Does it even matter? In a hegelian dialectic of Kafka brain methane we can assume that E=MC2 blah blah blah ..."
Trust your gut. Ask 1000 Questions. Don't trust Supposed: Thought Leaders, Expurts, White Coats.
Bullshit!
If Trump is the ultimate plant, the ultimate double, I think everybody better finish their bunker as soon as they can. I have not made up my mind yet.
Remember, he's not Galactus. He's one man and they've made it obvious they can lock him away for nothing. His popular support has prevented them from doing that yet. We'll see soon if he is the real thing. I'm strapped for either outcome.
I am keeping an open-mind. It has been quite a show, and he gets a TON of daily press for about 9 straight years now. That itself is suspicious since we know that media is highly controlled. If they didn't want us to see him, they'd ignore him. But he's even on CNN. That, and he thinks these vaccines are "miracles" and have saved millions of lives.
Yes, they've made it obvious that they can lock him up-----but they haven't. He keeps rising to the top and the accusations seem to just fade away--like a good ol' American hero story!
I feel a another grift coming on. He may very well be one of them--honestly how could he NOT be? Anyone who refuses to entertain the idea has not yet fully understood the power of the people running the show.
Most people I know refuse to believe this. Like I said, I am keeping an open mind--what choice do I have?
Daniel 11:27 And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table.
Yes, there are no real borders anymore--just money. And yes--all of those things! It makes no sense. Trump outed Clinton as a "nice guy but going to be in trouble because of Epstein" in 2015. 2105! Before he was even elected. That was 9 YEARS ago, and they 're still churning the same non-news about that island. "It's coming!" But it never comes.
You misspelled MOSSAD
Yes, that is my prediction too---too big a can of worms.
ЁЯСЖЁЯП╗
President Trump made a mistake on that one. He felt it would be divisive. It is totally clear now that her impunity emboldened the cheaters.
I watched the interview with Weinstein just a few days ago. We are now two years away from 2022 and much has changed since then. My comment still stands. Go watch his most recent interview with Tucker. He does not the person that "the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World" describes. It makes me wonder what is his purpose for taking so much time and effort to discredit Weinstein. Yes he was a lefty liberal and probably still is a liberal. But he also has a core nature that causes him to stand up for truth regardless of how controversial it might be. Go check out what happened to him at Evergreen College.
Anyone allowed on Tucker is a Deep State liar. Anyone who believed in Covid should never be listened to again, it was such an obvious scam, all one had to do, even in early March was notice that Neil Fergeson was the one who did the modelling. He has a long history of lying and he was responsible for the lockdowns and all the tyrannical measures. Then in April, he got caught having a married woman come over to his house for sex. That shows he knew there was nothing to be afraid of. Then in May the CDC came out and said the Covid had a survival rate of 99.94%. I could go on forever. These people didn't want to see the truth because the truth wasn't profitable until this past year. Now they all change their tune according to where the money is.
Not true. In that interview he mentioned more than once that this technology is brilliant and has a lot of potential. ThatтАЩs the message they want to send: тАЬyeah we messed up but next time it will be great!тАЭ
I didn't see it that way at all. I saw it as "Here's a fabulous new vaccine delivery system, because fat-encapsulation allows it to go everywhere, and it can be re-programmed so quickly, rather than the years taken to otherwise create a vaccine." That's revolutionary in terms of anti-virus delivery systems. (That's the biologist in him speaking.) But Robert Malone spoke of it having real negative impacts, particularly in bypassing the body's normal immunological response pathways - he of the "nuclear bomb in your body" analogy.
Can it be abused horribly? YES! Imagine you turn your back and someone's swapped in a toxic poison.
Wait. They've already done that.
But they can do it again and again, very easily. I think they're losing the battle on anybody taking needles in arms anymore in any scale. They'll have to find alternatives via air/food/water deliver systems.
But here's the kicker... The people setting this stuff off, have to ensure they're not killed themselves by whatever delivery system they choose. Or not in proximity to those who have been "infected". And yes, I'm aware our own (US) government has experimented a few times on aerosol delivery systems for infectious diseases. (subway tunnels, a weeklong(?) experiment in SF - possibly a hallucinogenic?, and others. There are documents that explain the best place to put a bioweapon - on choke points such as escalators, bus entry/exit points, etc. Where people HAVE to go through.
But back to your point, Yes, he took a more rabid stance early on, but he's mentioned a number of times that he and Heather have changed their minds, and even explained how that happened. From a biologist point of view, yes, locking everyone down hard DOES make sense because you DO burn through the infection, build up antibodies and it doesn't spread. But that's impossible to do. "Yo, military folks. Just.. just take the next 6 weeks off." For developing silicon wafers, you bake them at high temps, depositing layers for a few weeks. Who would provide chemicals for water filtration, and food for everyone? Toilet paper deliveries are ESSENTIAL!
Yes, his initial point was reactionary, strictly biological and completely impractical.
But he's changed his mind, quite openly. And for some reason that's a sin?
We need to get past this issue people have (those "gotcha moments").
We make mistakes. We learn, we change. We adapt.
This adherence to perfection and conformity is killing us collectively.
We're human.
And if Viruses don't exist, all viral vaccines are completely unnecessary. We've been scammed. According to the old Guinea-Bissau Study, only the Bacterial ones are of ANY VALUE. The rest are sloppily made, and do more net harm than good. Bye bye 1.25 Billion dollar market for FARMA.
I'm sure viruses were found at some point that led to the vaccine industry, but admittedly I don't have all the answers about that. I wholeheartedly agree that Big Phfarma shot themselves in the foot big time with all this, and they deserve to be punished - financially, reputationally, legally and any other adverb that someone can come up with. :-)
Bret, of all people should have known the problems with mRNA vaccines in general, well before this.
RFK was talking about the mRNA animal trials in spring 2020, none of the trials in mRNA every made it to humans until the covid ones in Jan2020. The official story is using a "Sequencing" of the "virus" that was received from the Chinese Government, the Moderna people said that got that sequence and had the Covid vaxx ready for trials in 6 days. Amazing how much moderna, pfizer, the FDA, CDC, The US military, congress, white house, every major religious leader, even major corporation, every show in Hollywood and Bret Weinstein all trusted the Chinese Government that much.
ALso, the Chinese sequence first published from the Pangolin virus was bogus and not even related to what we can harvest from COVID. And yet they still believed the later ones.
Hes compromised (I doubt it) or a useful idiot. So blinded to which is friend and whichis enemy that he makes the exact opposite call. I suspect he will be folded into the New Synthesis forming in anticipation of stealing Trumps fire, if Trump wins; you can just feed Bret information and he will panic and spurt out a "scholarly response". At times he will take a unique, genuine, contrarian view, which keeps his street cred alive.
you see this alot with the exlibs, like Lindsay (actually still a lib); they can parse the treees and miss the forest because forests are bad, or ALex Jones believes in forests etc.
Whenever he speaks with NRx or religious he does this distancing plus kumbayah thing that is creepy and bigoted underneath; "i didnt USUALLy used to have conversations with XYZ....but (insert dire contingency here) etc." I can barely stand it.
I understand your philosophy, I just don't think that is what's happening here.
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/these-restrictions-already-exist?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=1042216&post_id=140457758&utm_campaign=702469&isFreemail=true&r=biv2x&utm_medium=email
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-strange-rise-of-bret-weinstein?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=702469&post_id=140330052&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=biv2x&utm_medium=email
But AL! There's NO WAY the gov could already KNOW that a Marburg epidemic is on the way sometime on the near future. There's just no way.
oops.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/09/2020-26972/notice-of-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-countermeasures
You're right! But I am so captured by my government's omnipotence and know they are just here to help, nay, save! me. So why would I ever question this?! It's kind of like how Bill Gates knew covid was coming. He's so smart, I wish I were that smart.
yup. It's like McCullough doing the 180 on mRNA tech. "Well it may be a great delivery platform in the near future. " -- something to this effect. 100% bs
Very subtle---keeping the idea alive because the one thing that simply cannot happen is that people start thinking vaccines in general are poison and have been a human experiment/control mechanism since day one.
Well, is it or isn't it? (the mRNA technology)
The lipid encapsulation IS a great delivery mechanism. For good and for bad. It's not the encapsulation that is bad, it's the payload that makes the difference.
And what the intent of the payload is for.
At this point, I'm hoping there's enough liability protection for me so that anybody doing things for bad reasons will be sued out of existence.
That's where *I'd* spend a lot of time looking is in incremental or fast-moving legislation that absolves drug companies of penalties in non-EUA use cases.
But they can kill 1 company with suing, and rehire Most the Engineers and Execs and start a new company. Repeat. Moderna, still hasn't produced 1 Approved product non-EUA for public consumption.
I would hope that investors would recognize the track record of the execs to give them a wide berth and not reward such folks. And engineers can also choose whether they want to live with themselves for contributing to products that kill/maim. I think there are more good people than bad. And it gets increasingly hard to have bad triumph when good people won't have anything to do with them.
Romans 3:12.....there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
I don't want to come across as offensive in saying this, but you're doing a lot of projecting here about Bret's intent. He admits he made mistakes in following the narrative. I don't believe in hard lockdowns, but can see how someone with some knowledge about the life cycle of viral infections might think it's appropriate - I wasn't accepting of it, just throwing out a hypothesis.
I agree that there were many who spoke up early. Where are they now? Did they get tired and let others carry the torch? Were they threatened in their livelihood? Are they dead? Where are they? I honestly can't remember who they are, because my own analysis of data as I came across it led me to believe it was a scam. I also was educated several decades ago, and even my own brain knew that masks don't stop viruses. That's basic (to me) knowledge. And totally undercut the purposes for which it was purported to be in place for.
To me, my earliest recollection is Pierre Kory, and he's associated with FLCCC.net now, and still making appearances.
Many have joined the battle, and that doesn't negate the contributions of the OG's. ;-)
Bret's been fighting this for 2 years, so I'm not sure of the basis for 4 years. Keep in mind that censorship was in full-blown effect. Everyone was (and in some cases still are) tapdancing around the word, substituting other words, etc. just to stay on youtube and other platforms.
For each and every person who you suspect might be wrong, I say this: Nobody can take their integrity away. They have to give/throw it away.
What we do with it is our business. But we also need to be willing to forgive someone who's making an honest effort to rectify their wrongs. For them, it's a long haul effort to regain trust/credibility. That's part of the consequences for prior actions.
Psyops are complicated. Review a Critical Analysis of Kory here: (Don't look for Heroes/Saviors) https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/why-was-dr-pierre-kory-made-president
Well, I look at it like the CIA info presented to the Church Committee in congress. The CIA gave the committee what the CIA wanted them to see.
And that's what we're dealing with. But I refuse to believe that any one person (or any persons) can eliminate the truth completely. Sure, it can obfuscate the players and motives, but truth is truth. And while we can see outside the matrix, we should resist all avenues/efforts made to stuff us into it.
You're right, psyops are complicated. As long as the desired outcome is achieved, it doesn't really matter how it's done and to a lesser degree who is destroyed. Unless they're useful for other psyops, or to let them know their back is covered when things get rough.
As long as there's plausible deniability for anything, we're not going to get to the truth in that direction. People can change allegiances for all kinds of reasons, and as long as they're afraid of the disclosure of the alliance, disclosure of embarrassing information, or death of themselves or other loved ones, we're going to keep guessing.
All these dark games. Isn't the simple truth and honesty a much more desireable way to conduct ourselves?
Oh the tangled webs we weave, when we first seek to deceive.
Good Comment brother.
Also, we can play 6 Degrees of separation from Peter Thiel. Here it takes 2 Degree. Bret Weinstein -> Eric Weinstein -> Peter. For the Intel Connection to Companies and Silicon (I call it Silly-Con) Valley, please review RFK jr.'s book "Real Anthony Fauci," 2021. Although the book leaves out a lot of key info, still calls covy a Pandemic (it's not), Whitwashes some key players. it gives you a decent picture. Read the last Chapter "Germ Games" (about 45 pages) and you'd be better up to speed on the Intel side of things. I don't have any more time, but good luck.
I'm about 4 degrees of separation from someone in Bill Gates' financial world. My wife tells me to NOT get involved with political/biologic stuff with this person. I have to leave the room, because I'm dying to ask tons of questions, but I also don't want to jeopardize their job. They're very intelligent, and I presume they're doing things honestly without a lot of knowledge of some of the darker areas attributed to Gates. (I don't know them at all. Just have put pieces together from conversations over the years.)
I'm sure Gates compartmentalizes a lot of areas too. Loose lips sink ships.
Yes, none of the covid measure ever existed in any reality or by any unbribed scientist. They were only simulated in Event 201 in Sept 2019.
I think observing that a technology is clever (or "brilliant") and has a lot of potential is not the same as endorsing it as ready for prime time. The jury may still be out on the "potential" of this technology, if any. Fusion as a power source has a lot of potential, but that may be as far as it ever goes--it's always another 20 years.
Right now, one of the primary issues is holding accountable all the people that forced a clearly experimental product on the world without proper trials or testing, and (worse yet) then lying about it as its faults became manifest instead of admitting they had made a horrible mistake.
It could be different but it wasnтАЩt - he made sure to say it more than once. It was deliberate.
And no тАЬmistakesтАЭ were made. Are you new to this!?! This was all 100% deliberate and planned years in advance. It was designed to cripple entire populations. Mistakes!?! Sheesh.
I don't think anybody is believing that it's a mistake. Too much evidence shows it was planned for years, and patents back that up.
Is it possible for well-meaning people to play their part without knowledge that their role contributed to a disaster? Yes. I wonder how many people who administered shots are feeling guilt for delivering a poison. Or took it, not knowing that they'd be walking spike factories and transfer it to their loved ones around them?
The criminals are the ones who knew, and said nothing. And they should be tracked down and prosecuted for crimes against humanity, including murder - with full intent to kill.
"Is it possible for well-meaning people to play their part without knowledge that their role contributed to a disaster?" No--not at this level. The brainwashed nurse or pharmacist, sure.
Exactly, and many like RFK are threatening new pandemics by saying it will be another "Lab Leak" there was never a Covid in the first place and all these people would know that if they were legitimate. They are all playing a role, they are all out for profit.
Isn't that what Mr. Trump says too?
I saw the articles on Sage Hana and on "Conspiracy ...something..." crossposted by Sage Hana. She made a compelling argument against Bret Weistein, and also bagged in Peter McCullough in one of the articles. I almost did not watch this whole interview, but then I thought "Well, Dr. William Makis recommended it, so I will watch this to see what it looks like. Clearly to people have a very different view on this. I makes sense that Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson would be doing some kind of psyop piece." For me this was Dr. Makis recommendation vs. Sage Hana. Looking through the filter of Sage Hana et al. at the beginning of the interview I was very sceptical of what Mr. Weinstein was saying. Luckily, I decided to stay through the course.
We can perhaps agree that regardless of how it is used, the mRNA techonology is a pretty amazing technology. Yet, just because it is amazing, and like Mr. Weinstein asserts, we should not be using it as an any kind of vaccine. (See an interesting article with links to FDA pre-c19, when they considered an mRNA technology gene therapy not a vaccine. And, if I understood correctly, they still required more research before approving it : https://open.substack.com/pub/tomrenz/p/covered-up-mrna-shedding-transmissibility? )
And, here is my point. If that interview interview of Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson was a psyop, I was absolutely had. I am now really convinced of their sincere commitmment to humanity. And, what I saw was the opposite of what "Sage Hana et al." commented. That seemed to be an all out unfounded attack on Bret Weinstein. My question is, why would you do that? Why, indeed?
I concluded that this is one of the best interviews I have ever seen. Dr. William Makis recommendation was good, and his credibility in my eyes has increased. Whereas, I realized that I did not know who "Sage Hana" is or how I had subcribed to her substack. Interesting. So, I no longer am.
So, If you have not watched it yet, please watch the WHOLE interview before making up your mind on this Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson interview. I think it is highly informative and perhaps "too informative" and "too thought proviking" to have such attempts to prevent people from seeing it. It seemed that this was the purpose of Sahe Hana, to prevent me from seeing this brilliant interview. This was her "hill", her "battle", her "moment of truth". And, I assert that if you watch this interview in whole, your view if Saga Hana is likely change. And, if you do not watch it, then what can you contibute here except a recycled opinion of another who may not deaerve your trust.
Thank you for being part of the conversation. I thank Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carson for this monumental interview. and, I hope you watch it too. Thank you.
Here is the link to the entire interview:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-tucker-carlson-episode-60-with?
***
Many years ago, I asked a very special young person, who was about to join the Marines, about his thoughts on Colin Kaepernuck taking a knee during the national anthem. I thought it was unacceptable and unpatriotic. He said, "I may not agree with it, but I agree that it is his right to do that. I am joining the Marines for this very reason, to defend his right, and everybody's, right to do that in our country."
Tucker wears a red bracelet. Everything he does is intentional. Everything. The time to reveal the damage is now. All according to the script. The Great Awakening is the real NWO, the false light. If it were possible even the elect will be deceived
Revelation 14:6-12
Its all leading towards the Sunday mark. All of the Jesuit Theater
The whole тАЬwho is good, who is badтАЭ debates are just absolutely exhausting at this point. Do none of you understand that? How ridiculous this has become? All the so-called Patriots endlessly debating who is on whose side? ItтАЩs directing energy away from the real work that needs to be done.
This is your contribution to the peril we find ourselves in?
And according to the тАЬawakeтАЭ community, and depending on whose blog you are reading, there, according to all of you, is actually no one speaking up for mankindтАФnot Trump, Tucker, Vivek, RFK Jr., McCullough, MaloneтАФno one is тАЬreal.тАЭ No one is helpful! No one is honest! There is literally an argument against anyone and everyone who is standing up. Name ONE person of note who has not been pointed to as a clown, a traitor, an agent of Mossad, a CIA asset.
What are the odds there are only 1000 good people in the world and the rest of the world has been blackmailed, bribed or forced to go along with murdering the worldтАЩs population and enslaving the others who didnтАЩt die in the first few rounds? And all to get a piece of that trillion dollars?
What are the odds that before 2016 there was no one of real moral value whatsoever? That few really cared about the future of their family, their grandchildren, the legacy of their professional work, the future of humanity?
IтАЩm tired of it. Tired of the smugness, the тАЬI know everythingтАЭ people making lists of the liars and the clowns, which on a long enough timeline, seems to be just about everyone with a voice?
We are as divided as the ignorant masses, but instead of arguing about racism and the Ukraine, we spend our time debating names.
ItтАЩs reprehensible.
We have real work to do. I suggest we all get busy and do something. I see more sweat equity coming from the less intellectual corners of the truth movement than I do here on Substack, where supposedly the big minds have come to ponder our fate and research the methods theyтАЩre using for our extraction from life. The salt of the earth folks are running for offices and standing up to school boards and supporting local candidates. ThatтАЩs where IтАЩm putting my faith.
You all have a great day.
IтАЩm running from Substack as fast as I can.
Thank you, Andrea. Like I said, this is where тАЬtheyтАЭ got me and likely many other people. I was not a super fan of either man, however this interview was truly special. Did you watch the whole interview?
Anyone who believed in Covid should never be listened to again, it was such an obvious scam, all one had to do, even in early March was notice that Neil Fergeson was the one who did the modelling. He has a long history of lying and he was responsible for the lockdowns and all the tyrannical measures. Then in April, he got caught having a married woman come over to his house for sex. That shows he knew there was nothing to be afraid of. Then in May the CDC came out and said the Covid had a survival rate of 99.94%. I could go on forever. These people didn't want to see the truth because the truth wasn't profitable until this past year. Now they all change their tune according to where the money is.