I also saw the articles on Sage Hana and on "Conspiracy ...something..." crossposted by Sage Hana. She made a compelling argument against Bret Weistein, and also bagged in Peter McCullough in one of the articles. I almost did not watch this whole interview, but then I thought "Well, Dr. William Makis recommended it, so I will watch this …
I also saw the articles on Sage Hana and on "Conspiracy ...something..." crossposted by Sage Hana. She made a compelling argument against Bret Weistein, and also bagged in Peter McCullough in one of the articles. I almost did not watch this whole interview, but then I thought "Well, Dr. William Makis recommended it, so I will watch this to see what it looks like. Clearly to people have a very different view on this. I makes sense that Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson would be doing some kind of psyop piece." For me this was Dr. Makis recommendation vs. Sage Hana. Looking through the filter of Sage Hana et al. at the beginning of the interview I was very sceptical of what Mr. Weinstein was saying. Luckily, I decided to stay through the course.
We can perhaps agree that regardless of how it is used, the mRNA techonology is a pretty amazing technology. Yet, just because it is amazing, and like Mr. Weinstein asserts, we should not be using it as an any kind of vaccine. (See an interesting article with links to FDA pre-c19, when they considered an mRNA technology gene therapy not a vaccine. And, if I understood correctly, they still required more research before approving it : https://open.substack.com/pub/tomrenz/p/covered-up-mrna-shedding-transmissibility? )
And, here is my point. If that interview interview of Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson was a psyop, I was absolutely had. I am now really convinced of their sincere commitmment to humanity. And, what I saw was the opposite of what "Sage Hana et al." commented. That seemed to be an all out unfounded attack on Bret Weinstein. My question is, why would you do that? Why, indeed?
I concluded that this is one of the best interviews I have ever seen. Dr. William Makis recommendation was good, and his credibility in my eyes has increased. Whereas, I realized that I did not know who "Sage Hana" is or how I had subcribed to her substack. Interesting. So, I no longer am.
So, If you have not watched it yet, please watch the WHOLE interview before making up your mind on this Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson interview. I think it is highly informative and perhaps "too informative" and "too thought proviking" to have such attempts to prevent people from seeing it. It seemed that this was the purpose of Sahe Hana, to prevent me from seeing this brilliant interview. This was her "hill", her "battle", her "moment of truth". And, I assert that if you watch this interview in whole, your view if Saga Hana is likely change. And, if you do not watch it, then what can you contibute here except a recycled opinion of another who may not deaerve your trust.
Thank you for being part of the conversation. I thank Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carson for this monumental interview. and, I hope you watch it too. Thank you.
Many years ago, I asked a very special young person, who was about to join the Marines, about his thoughts on Colin Kaepernuck taking a knee during the national anthem. I thought it was unacceptable and unpatriotic. He said, "I may not agree with it, but I agree that it is his right to do that. I am joining the Marines for this very reason, to defend his right, and everybody's, right to do that in our country."
I also saw the articles on Sage Hana and on "Conspiracy ...something..." crossposted by Sage Hana. She made a compelling argument against Bret Weistein, and also bagged in Peter McCullough in one of the articles. I almost did not watch this whole interview, but then I thought "Well, Dr. William Makis recommended it, so I will watch this to see what it looks like. Clearly to people have a very different view on this. I makes sense that Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson would be doing some kind of psyop piece." For me this was Dr. Makis recommendation vs. Sage Hana. Looking through the filter of Sage Hana et al. at the beginning of the interview I was very sceptical of what Mr. Weinstein was saying. Luckily, I decided to stay through the course.
We can perhaps agree that regardless of how it is used, the mRNA techonology is a pretty amazing technology. Yet, just because it is amazing, and like Mr. Weinstein asserts, we should not be using it as an any kind of vaccine. (See an interesting article with links to FDA pre-c19, when they considered an mRNA technology gene therapy not a vaccine. And, if I understood correctly, they still required more research before approving it : https://open.substack.com/pub/tomrenz/p/covered-up-mrna-shedding-transmissibility? )
And, here is my point. If that interview interview of Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson was a psyop, I was absolutely had. I am now really convinced of their sincere commitmment to humanity. And, what I saw was the opposite of what "Sage Hana et al." commented. That seemed to be an all out unfounded attack on Bret Weinstein. My question is, why would you do that? Why, indeed?
I concluded that this is one of the best interviews I have ever seen. Dr. William Makis recommendation was good, and his credibility in my eyes has increased. Whereas, I realized that I did not know who "Sage Hana" is or how I had subcribed to her substack. Interesting. So, I no longer am.
So, If you have not watched it yet, please watch the WHOLE interview before making up your mind on this Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carson interview. I think it is highly informative and perhaps "too informative" and "too thought proviking" to have such attempts to prevent people from seeing it. It seemed that this was the purpose of Sahe Hana, to prevent me from seeing this brilliant interview. This was her "hill", her "battle", her "moment of truth". And, I assert that if you watch this interview in whole, your view if Saga Hana is likely change. And, if you do not watch it, then what can you contibute here except a recycled opinion of another who may not deaerve your trust.
Thank you for being part of the conversation. I thank Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carson for this monumental interview. and, I hope you watch it too. Thank you.
Here is the link to the entire interview:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-tucker-carlson-episode-60-with?
***
Many years ago, I asked a very special young person, who was about to join the Marines, about his thoughts on Colin Kaepernuck taking a knee during the national anthem. I thought it was unacceptable and unpatriotic. He said, "I may not agree with it, but I agree that it is his right to do that. I am joining the Marines for this very reason, to defend his right, and everybody's, right to do that in our country."