I don't want to come across as offensive in saying this, but you're doing a lot of projecting here about Bret's intent. He admits he made mistakes in following the narrative. I don't believe in hard lockdowns, but can see how someone with some knowledge about the life cycle of viral infections might think it's appropriate - I wasn't accepting of it, just throwing out a hypothesis.
I agree that there were many who spoke up early. Where are they now? Did they get tired and let others carry the torch? Were they threatened in their livelihood? Are they dead? Where are they? I honestly can't remember who they are, because my own analysis of data as I came across it led me to believe it was a scam. I also was educated several decades ago, and even my own brain knew that masks don't stop viruses. That's basic (to me) knowledge. And totally undercut the purposes for which it was purported to be in place for.
To me, my earliest recollection is Pierre Kory, and he's associated with FLCCC.net now, and still making appearances.
Many have joined the battle, and that doesn't negate the contributions of the OG's. ;-)
Bret's been fighting this for 2 years, so I'm not sure of the basis for 4 years. Keep in mind that censorship was in full-blown effect. Everyone was (and in some cases still are) tapdancing around the word, substituting other words, etc. just to stay on youtube and other platforms.
For each and every person who you suspect might be wrong, I say this: Nobody can take their integrity away. They have to give/throw it away.
What we do with it is our business. But we also need to be willing to forgive someone who's making an honest effort to rectify their wrongs. For them, it's a long haul effort to regain trust/credibility. That's part of the consequences for prior actions.
Well, I look at it like the CIA info presented to the Church Committee in congress. The CIA gave the committee what the CIA wanted them to see.
And that's what we're dealing with. But I refuse to believe that any one person (or any persons) can eliminate the truth completely. Sure, it can obfuscate the players and motives, but truth is truth. And while we can see outside the matrix, we should resist all avenues/efforts made to stuff us into it.
You're right, psyops are complicated. As long as the desired outcome is achieved, it doesn't really matter how it's done and to a lesser degree who is destroyed. Unless they're useful for other psyops, or to let them know their back is covered when things get rough.
As long as there's plausible deniability for anything, we're not going to get to the truth in that direction. People can change allegiances for all kinds of reasons, and as long as they're afraid of the disclosure of the alliance, disclosure of embarrassing information, or death of themselves or other loved ones, we're going to keep guessing.
All these dark games. Isn't the simple truth and honesty a much more desireable way to conduct ourselves?
Oh the tangled webs we weave, when we first seek to deceive.
Also, we can play 6 Degrees of separation from Peter Thiel. Here it takes 2 Degree. Bret Weinstein -> Eric Weinstein -> Peter. For the Intel Connection to Companies and Silicon (I call it Silly-Con) Valley, please review RFK jr.'s book "Real Anthony Fauci," 2021. Although the book leaves out a lot of key info, still calls covy a Pandemic (it's not), Whitwashes some key players. it gives you a decent picture. Read the last Chapter "Germ Games" (about 45 pages) and you'd be better up to speed on the Intel side of things. I don't have any more time, but good luck.
I'm about 4 degrees of separation from someone in Bill Gates' financial world. My wife tells me to NOT get involved with political/biologic stuff with this person. I have to leave the room, because I'm dying to ask tons of questions, but I also don't want to jeopardize their job. They're very intelligent, and I presume they're doing things honestly without a lot of knowledge of some of the darker areas attributed to Gates. (I don't know them at all. Just have put pieces together from conversations over the years.)
I'm sure Gates compartmentalizes a lot of areas too. Loose lips sink ships.
I don't want to come across as offensive in saying this, but you're doing a lot of projecting here about Bret's intent. He admits he made mistakes in following the narrative. I don't believe in hard lockdowns, but can see how someone with some knowledge about the life cycle of viral infections might think it's appropriate - I wasn't accepting of it, just throwing out a hypothesis.
I agree that there were many who spoke up early. Where are they now? Did they get tired and let others carry the torch? Were they threatened in their livelihood? Are they dead? Where are they? I honestly can't remember who they are, because my own analysis of data as I came across it led me to believe it was a scam. I also was educated several decades ago, and even my own brain knew that masks don't stop viruses. That's basic (to me) knowledge. And totally undercut the purposes for which it was purported to be in place for.
To me, my earliest recollection is Pierre Kory, and he's associated with FLCCC.net now, and still making appearances.
Many have joined the battle, and that doesn't negate the contributions of the OG's. ;-)
Bret's been fighting this for 2 years, so I'm not sure of the basis for 4 years. Keep in mind that censorship was in full-blown effect. Everyone was (and in some cases still are) tapdancing around the word, substituting other words, etc. just to stay on youtube and other platforms.
For each and every person who you suspect might be wrong, I say this: Nobody can take their integrity away. They have to give/throw it away.
What we do with it is our business. But we also need to be willing to forgive someone who's making an honest effort to rectify their wrongs. For them, it's a long haul effort to regain trust/credibility. That's part of the consequences for prior actions.
Psyops are complicated. Review a Critical Analysis of Kory here: (Don't look for Heroes/Saviors) https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/why-was-dr-pierre-kory-made-president
Well, I look at it like the CIA info presented to the Church Committee in congress. The CIA gave the committee what the CIA wanted them to see.
And that's what we're dealing with. But I refuse to believe that any one person (or any persons) can eliminate the truth completely. Sure, it can obfuscate the players and motives, but truth is truth. And while we can see outside the matrix, we should resist all avenues/efforts made to stuff us into it.
You're right, psyops are complicated. As long as the desired outcome is achieved, it doesn't really matter how it's done and to a lesser degree who is destroyed. Unless they're useful for other psyops, or to let them know their back is covered when things get rough.
As long as there's plausible deniability for anything, we're not going to get to the truth in that direction. People can change allegiances for all kinds of reasons, and as long as they're afraid of the disclosure of the alliance, disclosure of embarrassing information, or death of themselves or other loved ones, we're going to keep guessing.
All these dark games. Isn't the simple truth and honesty a much more desireable way to conduct ourselves?
Oh the tangled webs we weave, when we first seek to deceive.
Good Comment brother.
Also, we can play 6 Degrees of separation from Peter Thiel. Here it takes 2 Degree. Bret Weinstein -> Eric Weinstein -> Peter. For the Intel Connection to Companies and Silicon (I call it Silly-Con) Valley, please review RFK jr.'s book "Real Anthony Fauci," 2021. Although the book leaves out a lot of key info, still calls covy a Pandemic (it's not), Whitwashes some key players. it gives you a decent picture. Read the last Chapter "Germ Games" (about 45 pages) and you'd be better up to speed on the Intel side of things. I don't have any more time, but good luck.
I'm about 4 degrees of separation from someone in Bill Gates' financial world. My wife tells me to NOT get involved with political/biologic stuff with this person. I have to leave the room, because I'm dying to ask tons of questions, but I also don't want to jeopardize their job. They're very intelligent, and I presume they're doing things honestly without a lot of knowledge of some of the darker areas attributed to Gates. (I don't know them at all. Just have put pieces together from conversations over the years.)
I'm sure Gates compartmentalizes a lot of areas too. Loose lips sink ships.
Yes, none of the covid measure ever existed in any reality or by any unbribed scientist. They were only simulated in Event 201 in Sept 2019.