5 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Saille's avatar

There is much solid evidence to make claims of vaccine contamination and associated regulatory failure.

So why make the unsubstantiated claim of genocidal intent? It is easily dismissed as conspiratorial and therefore offers a lifeline to defenders of the TGA position who need to be left exposed with nowhere to hide.

Expand full comment
Andrea's avatar

Perhaps the fact that this has been going on for so long now, one can only assume that there is intent? Think how quickly products get recalled from the supermarket when a couple of people get sick? It's hard to accept but it is a rational conclusion. The time to pull these products was years ago based on the evidence of harm.

Expand full comment
Nancy Urga's avatar

It was always about big $ medical (maiming/sickness) and depop.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

If there isn't genocidal intent why aren't the injections immediately halted? Instead the injections continue to be pushed. The swine flu injection IIRC was halted after fifty deaths. These injections apparently have millions of deaths and injuries, most leading to early death.

Expand full comment
Sid's avatar
Dec 24Edited

There is no reason to use a mamalian plasmid to let ecoli expres mrna when a the T7 promoter has been safely used for 40 years. Especially when it contains the SV40 cancer promoter.

This was intentional murder, keep in mind that the therapeutics goods association from their emails knew they were dealing wth a mamalian vector with DNA that will integrate into mamalian cell genome including humans. They knew it and said nothing and no one has questioned why there was an SV40 Promter to boot. This was genocide and more people will die if Fenbendazole and Ivermectin sare not deployed on a large scale to treat cancer. That is why Governments are doing everything in their power to stop people from taking these safe medically harmless compounds. Genocide of the first order!!

Expand full comment