The question is how did Fauci, Gates and Moderna get the British Crown, first under the late Queen Elizabeth, and now King Charles to enforce all their greed upon the entire British Commonwealth, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The British Crown came down hard on everyone throwing citizens in Jail for standing up for their ri…
The question is how did Fauci, Gates and Moderna get the British Crown, first under the late Queen Elizabeth, and now King Charles to enforce all their greed upon the entire British Commonwealth, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The British Crown came down hard on everyone throwing citizens in Jail for standing up for their right not to be turned into a human mRNA experiment. For just 1 example of how the Crown's entire justice department has become an arm of organized crime ... https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/a-criminal-surprise
Great point, but you have the power structure backwards, The Crown crowd are part of the Davos crowd, they are running this show, world political leaders, minions, Gates, etc., are all doing their bidding, not the other way around.
Here is an excellent reason the Crown would want a LOT of people dead IMO. The Crown is the largest landowner in the world (link). Read the info at the link, imagine the change in the lives of their "subjects" if that portfolio was divested. If they gave up just their UK land, every UK citizen could have an acre. That kind of thinking must keep Charles and family up at night. https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/is-queen-elizabeth-ii-worlds-biggest-landowner.html/
Ever heard of the Enclosure Act? (link) In England the peasants were poor but self sustaining. The Lords knew with the end of feudalism that the peasants would become harder and harder to control. It started with Henry VIII, he took peasant land to pay off his debts. https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/enclosure-acts-industrial-revolution/
Later Lords drove the peasants off the land they held in common saying that their farming methods were inefficient (sound familiar?). They drove the peasants into cities that could barely accommodate them (15 minutes cities ring a bell?). Once there they were desperate, starving and had to take the low wages, long hours of the factories of the Industrial Age. (you will own nothing, we will be happy).
They are running their time tested plays again but THIS time they want 90 percent of the world dead. And they are not stopping, we are only in the first act people, plan accordingly.
I will present it as such. It gets very interesting when you break down english to latin. To turn means to turn, but to re-turn it means to turn back towards oneself. To spect is to watch or a mirror, but to re-spect is to look back upon oneself. Common english is a moving language, and any institution built on a moving foundation of words is unstable. Thus the english meanings that all english institutions are built on have fixed meanings that don't change over time. I suspect the masonic dictionary of unchanging meanings is "Black's Law". Black as in dead and unmoving. The really deep dive get into whether the DE-claration of independence really means de clarification. If the "founding fathers" really meant it, they should have said PRO-claimation.
I have English as a first language and had what today would be viewed as a very formal education. One of the rules of language we were taught was that it is a living thing, it evolves over time, and draws from many different cultures from many different times. We always had unabridged dictionaries in each classroom and time was spent considering accepted meanings, evolving meanings and historically accurate ones.
The fellows who created the Declaration of Independence and other US governing docs were highly educated, multi lingual, many were wealthy and would have had classical educations. Meaning they would have been well versed in Greek, Latin, French and possibly German. They would have approached the document's linguistic creation with great care. I suspect they would have welcomed your observations!
Only over those that don't accept SALVATION through THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE - AMEN HALLELU-YAH and thereby consenting to slavery under the gospel of THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN!
The question is how did Fauci, Gates and Moderna get the British Crown, first under the late Queen Elizabeth, and now King Charles to enforce all their greed upon the entire British Commonwealth, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The British Crown came down hard on everyone throwing citizens in Jail for standing up for their right not to be turned into a human mRNA experiment. For just 1 example of how the Crown's entire justice department has become an arm of organized crime ... https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/a-criminal-surprise
Great point, but you have the power structure backwards, The Crown crowd are part of the Davos crowd, they are running this show, world political leaders, minions, Gates, etc., are all doing their bidding, not the other way around.
Here is an excellent reason the Crown would want a LOT of people dead IMO. The Crown is the largest landowner in the world (link). Read the info at the link, imagine the change in the lives of their "subjects" if that portfolio was divested. If they gave up just their UK land, every UK citizen could have an acre. That kind of thinking must keep Charles and family up at night. https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/is-queen-elizabeth-ii-worlds-biggest-landowner.html/
Ever heard of the Enclosure Act? (link) In England the peasants were poor but self sustaining. The Lords knew with the end of feudalism that the peasants would become harder and harder to control. It started with Henry VIII, he took peasant land to pay off his debts. https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/enclosure-acts-industrial-revolution/
Later Lords drove the peasants off the land they held in common saying that their farming methods were inefficient (sound familiar?). They drove the peasants into cities that could barely accommodate them (15 minutes cities ring a bell?). Once there they were desperate, starving and had to take the low wages, long hours of the factories of the Industrial Age. (you will own nothing, we will be happy).
Nothing is new under the sun, we are seeing a redux of the Enclosure Act run worldwide, along with a massive vax program that slaughters people JUST as the vax program at the end of WW1 run by the US led to the Spanish Flu epidemic (link) These guys run the same plays every damn century. https://thegranddisillusion.wordpress.com/the-spanish-influenza-epidemic-of-1918-was-caused-by-vaccinations/
They are running their time tested plays again but THIS time they want 90 percent of the world dead. And they are not stopping, we are only in the first act people, plan accordingly.
Very insightful and accurate analysis!
Thank you!
mind if i share your comment? people in the commonwealth need to know this.
Certainly, as long as you represent it as being, "one man's opinion"
I will present it as such. It gets very interesting when you break down english to latin. To turn means to turn, but to re-turn it means to turn back towards oneself. To spect is to watch or a mirror, but to re-spect is to look back upon oneself. Common english is a moving language, and any institution built on a moving foundation of words is unstable. Thus the english meanings that all english institutions are built on have fixed meanings that don't change over time. I suspect the masonic dictionary of unchanging meanings is "Black's Law". Black as in dead and unmoving. The really deep dive get into whether the DE-claration of independence really means de clarification. If the "founding fathers" really meant it, they should have said PRO-claimation.
Thank you for that.
I have English as a first language and had what today would be viewed as a very formal education. One of the rules of language we were taught was that it is a living thing, it evolves over time, and draws from many different cultures from many different times. We always had unabridged dictionaries in each classroom and time was spent considering accepted meanings, evolving meanings and historically accurate ones.
The fellows who created the Declaration of Independence and other US governing docs were highly educated, multi lingual, many were wealthy and would have had classical educations. Meaning they would have been well versed in Greek, Latin, French and possibly German. They would have approached the document's linguistic creation with great care. I suspect they would have welcomed your observations!
The Answer is:
Freemasonry........
and other S.S. affiliates in collusion with Communist infiltrators. The Minions.
And for more than a few centuries it’s been since they’ve taken full control/power re ‘London’. They own London per se. Long time now. Thanks.
Only over those that don't accept SALVATION through THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE - AMEN HALLELU-YAH and thereby consenting to slavery under the gospel of THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN!