"Up to" this whole article is ridiculous in its framing, in the sense that there is no way to know, and to extrapolate to entire lifetimes is ridiculous after 2 years of data.
The vaccine seems like a new risk factor, like obesity, like smoking, like environment, etc, somethings raise your chances, somethings lower your chances, but to p…
"Up to" this whole article is ridiculous in its framing, in the sense that there is no way to know, and to extrapolate to entire lifetimes is ridiculous after 2 years of data.
The vaccine seems like a new risk factor, like obesity, like smoking, like environment, etc, somethings raise your chances, somethings lower your chances, but to present everything in terms of numbers like this is part of the problem that leads us into so many messes of fear driven decision making.
How do these numbers adjust if you take what you are selling VIR-X? How do your numbers adjust with certain diets, with certain exercise, with certain other clearance compounds, where you live, genetics, etc. Which batches you received, which country you received them in? From what I recall AEs clustered in certain areas too which indicated poor QC or intentional testing on populations.
Absolutely meaningless framing here in line with the reasoning that leads people into the grips of harmful treatments and interventions in the first place.
Inputs are obscure, can be obfuscated, can be biased, can be misrepresented, and have a clear purpose. There is so much that is not useful here, talking to someone and saying you have 24 years robbed is a losing approach in my opinion.
"Up to" this whole article is ridiculous in its framing, in the sense that there is no way to know, and to extrapolate to entire lifetimes is ridiculous after 2 years of data.
The vaccine seems like a new risk factor, like obesity, like smoking, like environment, etc, somethings raise your chances, somethings lower your chances, but to present everything in terms of numbers like this is part of the problem that leads us into so many messes of fear driven decision making.
How do these numbers adjust if you take what you are selling VIR-X? How do your numbers adjust with certain diets, with certain exercise, with certain other clearance compounds, where you live, genetics, etc. Which batches you received, which country you received them in? From what I recall AEs clustered in certain areas too which indicated poor QC or intentional testing on populations.
Absolutely meaningless framing here in line with the reasoning that leads people into the grips of harmful treatments and interventions in the first place.
Inputs are obscure, can be obfuscated, can be biased, can be misrepresented, and have a clear purpose. There is so much that is not useful here, talking to someone and saying you have 24 years robbed is a losing approach in my opinion.