"Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line." Alden et al. 2022 Curr Iss Mol Biol. I'm surprised that you don't recognise the mdpi html.
This is an article from one of the official (aka. corrupt) journals. Presenting it as "evidence" is an insult to my intelligence, and probably to others' as well...
Not straw man at all. You are deflecting. Your logic is way off and uninformed. Your conclusions are simply wrong.
It was I who "Like"d both of your "comments."
In your free time, if you are a real person who hasn't been sold out, please, consider reading how trolls work. The following example goes a long way:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/intelligent-trolls-are-now-saying
And you are not addressing anything in specific, only create false analogies.
You surely are "informed."
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Read this
What for?
It looks like a shill.
"Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line." Alden et al. 2022 Curr Iss Mol Biol. I'm surprised that you don't recognise the mdpi html.
You are still accusing me of being a moron but refuse to provide the source where you claim I an wrong, so it ends up as a straw man argument. :)
Try again. :)
You say there is no vaccine mRNA in the vaccine vials.
Here is a paper that shows there is mRNA in the vaccine vials and it is the proprietary strand from Pfizer.
Further, the paper shows that the proprietary Pfizer mRNA is incorporated into human liver cell DNA and amplified on replication.
I will post the link once again: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
And you still believe in the Easter Bunny.
Why are you insulting me? I am showing you the evidence you wanted.
This is an article from one of the official (aka. corrupt) journals. Presenting it as "evidence" is an insult to my intelligence, and probably to others' as well...