His ad hominem is certainly overblown and unfortunate re: Nazi, but, more importantly, he cogently answered your main and exceedingly specious argument, and, as such, you have been sufficiently proven to be dead wrong.
I hope you can appreciate his correct historical context, and maybe you will in the future refrain from making such specious claims which are anything but historically accurate.
His ad hominem is certainly overblown and unfortunate re: Nazi, but, more importantly, he cogently answered your main and exceedingly specious argument, and, as such, you have been sufficiently proven to be dead wrong.
I hope you can appreciate his correct historical context, and maybe you will in the future refrain from making such specious claims which are anything but historically accurate.
His ad hominem is certainly overblown and unfortunate re: Nazi, but, more importantly, he cogently answered your main and exceedingly specious argument, and, as such, you have been sufficiently proven to be dead wrong.
I hope you can appreciate his correct historical context, and maybe you will in the future refrain from making such specious claims which are anything but historically accurate.
I challenge you to tell me what I said that is historically inaccurate.
Marxism and Zionism have overlapping goals. Any good faith examination of the history of these ideologies shows that.