3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
DT's avatar

Yes, you are correct! Google this: "Food Chain Reaction—A Global Food Security Game 2015", it is a 47 page PDF food game plan similar to event 201.

Here is the abstract: "The Center for American Progress, World Wildlife Fund, Cargill, Mars, and CNA

developed and executed a policy decision-making game designed to explore issues

arising from, and possible responses to, global food system disruptions. The game

took place in November 2015 in Washington, D.C., and included senior officials and

subject matter experts on teams representing Brazil, Continental Africa, China, the

European Union (EU), India, the United States, Multilateral Institutions, and Business

and Investors. During four rounds of game play spanning the decade 2020 to 2030,

players confronted food system pressure at the intersection of population growth,

urbanization, severe weather, and social unrest. In response, players crafted policies,

made decisions, and took actions that dynamically influenced the state of the world

as the game advanced. As the chain reaction of impacts tied to their choices became

apparent, players experienced first-hand how their decisions and actions influenced

global food security."

We are in phase II of their plan:

"Game results:

Prior to the start of the game (through 2019), demographic changes, climate

pressures, and political crises had combined to threaten food security. The first

round spanning 2020 – 2021, included lower than average global foods stocks, rising

food prices, weather-related disasters, and instances of social unrest. The cumulative

actions of players influenced worldwide conditions in subsequent rounds. In the

second round spanning 2022 - 2024, players experienced the game’s food security

crisis peak, followed by a tempering of global pressures in round three (2025 – 2027).

The fourth and final round concluded in 2030 and brought players full circle to

increasingly tight global circumstances, similar to those in the first round"

Interesting paragraph given the current events, remember TX govnr is a WFER:

"• Prompted by instances of significant internal and external migration and

social unrest, teams identified the contribution of food security to regional

stability. Players expressed concern that extreme weather events, food

insecurity, and major refugee movements contribute to conflict"

"In sum, from 2028 through 2030, with prices on the rise again stimulating farm

activity, offset by several weather problems, production falls just barely short of

original expectations. Demand however, is strong, exceeding expectations after

recent years of favorable economic growth. Food stocks tighten again from 21

percent to 17.5 percent, which is the tightest stock level in a decade. Although prices

rise strongly, from the beginning of 2028 to the end of 2030, at 387 percent of long-

term averages, they fall just short of the 395 percent peak in 2024.

Organizations and media are closely monitoring events to see if governments learned

from the food price surge earlier this decade and are wondering what may lie ahead."

Expand full comment
Curtis's avatar

They always tell us what they're going to do in advance, but nobody listens....

Expand full comment
Liz G's avatar

They have to us right. It's part of their satanic ritual-implied consent. Sure they tell us and if we don't push back, we must be consenting.

Expand full comment