"The deadliest payload is always the slow kill bioweapon “vaccine.”"
Dam straight!!
Kill someone in a drop dead fashion and you perhaps have the expense of the cleanup, burial and memorials etc
You have a sudden psychological trauma from which you may recover
And the victim may even have an estate and assets to bequeath in order to do it
But SLOW KILL them as in AIDS (anyone ever wonder about AIDS?) and you can strip the victims AND THEIR FAMILIES of EVERYTHING on the way to their inevitable reward. For years/decades you strip and traumatize the victims and the care takers. EVERYTHING is on the table for the looting. Dignity, strength, assets, happiness, hope, EVERY DAM THING THERE IS IS ON THE TABLE when you slow kill people en masse. You can only hope by the time the inevitable death occurs there is enough left to bury the poor soul. More likely someone (or perhaps a tax subsidy) will need to dig deep to even dispose of the victims because they'll have been stripped clean previously.
Slow kill also has the all important plausible deniability to protect the guilty so they may continue the evil. When you nuke someone it is pretty obvious who's at fault and gives the target lab rats the opportunity o come after the perps with their pitchforks.
When you are talking bang for the buck slow kill wins every time. You can probably kill 10k people rapidly and the civilization survives. But if you slow kill them the real and intangible effects of such an event exacts untold harm. Perhaps culture and civilization destroying harm.
"The deadliest payload is always the slow kill bioweapon “vaccine.”"
Dam straight!!
Kill someone in a drop dead fashion and you perhaps have the expense of the cleanup, burial and memorials etc
You have a sudden psychological trauma from which you may recover
And the victim may even have an estate and assets to bequeath in order to do it
But SLOW KILL them as in AIDS (anyone ever wonder about AIDS?) and you can strip the victims AND THEIR FAMILIES of EVERYTHING on the way to their inevitable reward. For years/decades you strip and traumatize the victims and the care takers. EVERYTHING is on the table for the looting. Dignity, strength, assets, happiness, hope, EVERY DAM THING THERE IS IS ON THE TABLE when you slow kill people en masse. You can only hope by the time the inevitable death occurs there is enough left to bury the poor soul. More likely someone (or perhaps a tax subsidy) will need to dig deep to even dispose of the victims because they'll have been stripped clean previously.
Slow kill also has the all important plausible deniability to protect the guilty so they may continue the evil. When you nuke someone it is pretty obvious who's at fault and gives the target lab rats the opportunity o come after the perps with their pitchforks.
When you are talking bang for the buck slow kill wins every time. You can probably kill 10k people rapidly and the civilization survives. But if you slow kill them the real and intangible effects of such an event exacts untold harm. Perhaps culture and civilization destroying harm.
🎯