You will take a rushed to market never before tried jab, and then take it multiple times but question the purity of the Ivermectin because you dont trust fly by night pharmacies??? Are you effing kidding me?
But….you can not assume all who use the term realize the REAL meaning….so many are still believing this vac was to some extent safe and effective which it was NOT…The use of the term vaccine should be always be defined with an asterisk since the term was changed by the Biden Govt to hide it true character…and they wanted the data hidden from view for 75 yrs.
My wife and I had the original two jabs of AstraZeneca, no boosters of any sort. I've been trying to find out what the long term dangers are of AZ and wharf precautions I need to take. We are both in our late 60's and in good health.
Some people have no problems. There are good and bad batches. Then it depends on injection, did they aspirate first? Most do not. Then did it hit a vein, that's bad, but into the muscle is safer.
I know someone who works at Pfi$er. Very small fish.
There is no doubt in my mind that if I showed this to her, she would simply disregard it and say "It's C0VID that caused the increase in cancer, not the vaxx."
Censored or simply ignored by the very researchers themselves. No doubt to get funded by any left wing “ international groups”…or the US before Trump you could never ask about vac status in your review of causal agents …..even now they will refuse to ever ask the question. If covid vac status is not asked then the results are BOGUS with a Big “B”.
You will take a rushed to market never before tried jab, and then take it multiple times but question the purity of the Ivermectin because you dont trust fly by night pharmacies??? Are you effing kidding me?
As you know, these are not "vaccines" but gene therapies: why not to use a proper terminology?
You even used the quotes around vaccines, and you still complain.
Unreal.
Vaccine is the word that is commonly used to describe this pharma product. Most people accept that it's a vaccine. So that would be the word to use.
But….you can not assume all who use the term realize the REAL meaning….so many are still believing this vac was to some extent safe and effective which it was NOT…The use of the term vaccine should be always be defined with an asterisk since the term was changed by the Biden Govt to hide it true character…and they wanted the data hidden from view for 75 yrs.
My wife and I had the original two jabs of AstraZeneca, no boosters of any sort. I've been trying to find out what the long term dangers are of AZ and wharf precautions I need to take. We are both in our late 60's and in good health.
Some people have no problems. There are good and bad batches. Then it depends on injection, did they aspirate first? Most do not. Then did it hit a vein, that's bad, but into the muscle is safer.
I know someone who works at Pfi$er. Very small fish.
There is no doubt in my mind that if I showed this to her, she would simply disregard it and say "It's C0VID that caused the increase in cancer, not the vaxx."
UK DATA BILL 😱😱😱
https://youtu.be/0KX4ZOsLnJw
Censored or simply ignored by the very researchers themselves. No doubt to get funded by any left wing “ international groups”…or the US before Trump you could never ask about vac status in your review of causal agents …..even now they will refuse to ever ask the question. If covid vac status is not asked then the results are BOGUS with a Big “B”.
Do you trust Pfizer and Moderna?
What is the purity of the ivermectin? I don’t trust these fly by night pharmacies
100% pure.
Please contact the company directly and they will send you 3rd party certifications.
This is anything but a fly-by-night company.
Like I wrote in the article, any questions should be addressed to the company: info@virex.health
Please do not ask in the comments, and contact them directly.
Ok thank you!