OK. I’m a former senior pharma exec. This guy was not in research. He won’t have published any papers.
He was in product strategy, which is essentially working out how to allocate capital across your portfolio (in studies, marketing, launches or M&A). These people have an overview of what’s happening in R&D but never do any R or D.
Using the recruiting search tool SignalHire, there is a profile for one Jordon Walker with the associated title at Pfizer with a prior career posting at the Dept of Urology at UT-Southwestern (it's where he complete medical school)
Also in this space, there is no shortage of MDs in marketing and in marketing adjacent roles. From conversations with people over the years, they just don't like being in medicine as much, but lean into what they know. Luckily companies play plenty and even have it as basically a prerequisite for roles like being a MSL.
For an example, if you search for job postings in pharma for director level, anything more senior, and medical roles an MD is almost a requirement. Though PhD and Masters can also pass.
They don’t. But you’ll find MDs aplenty in marketing, strategy, trial design, investment banking, equity research, consulting ....lots of people train as physicians and then discover patients are icky and get a nice job in front of a computer.
Other people in these strategy roles are scientists (who don’t like labs), former equity analysts & bankers & consultants.
“Walker’s interview comments confirmed just about everything we’ve long suspected about pharma. In fact, his claims are so believable that it is also unbelievable. It’s an explosive story tailor-made for conservative conspiracy television. In fact, it’s SO believably unbelievable that some people literally don’t believe it and think Project Veritas — and the rest of rightwing media — are being set up to be totally discredited.
In other words, it seems too good to be true. If I were suing Pfizer and someone sent me all these materials, I would be EXTREMELY cautious about running straight to court with it. I would want to triple-check it first. You could lose the lawsuit if it turned out to be fake.”
Then he points out how much of what Walker claims about himself, for example, graduating from Yale, can’t be verified, among many other points.
This story needed to be handled with much more caution than it was, and my head spins from all the potential implications this could have, regarding PV’s reliability.
Same on graphene. Cholesterol has same visual which might explain the photographs of “chip like structures” and crappy needles slough off metallics which might further explain visual stuff and and also possibly spectrometry “evidence” ...
All that said, it is a long wet dream of pharma to use GO as an adjuvant so I am suspicious... a rush job to “stop a deadly pandemic” might provide perfect cover for testing out your dream poison
There was already enough from Webb himself on Malone’s reliability to raise a red flag. The fact that this was pushed so hard so fast was another red flag. I am thrilled however that a lot more people are questioning the force-feeding now than in the past.
Here is a comment left on the O’shea article. Seems to be pretty sure hes fugazi.—
Hi Brian, to me it looks like nothing in his bio adds up.
Here are some inconsistencies and strangenesses about all the info on Walker you provided: (I'm of the opinion that he might very well be a fake, so we need to be very very careful - I write for Brownstone https://brownstone.org/author/debbie-lerman/, in case you need my Covid warrior bonafides.)
1) Why all the aliases? I've never met a legitimate doctor with so many different name combos
2) in the May 18, 2020 article about Covid treatments, his name as an author is listed without an MD (whereas one of the other authors has it), although he supposedly graduated from Med School in 2018.
2) His date of NYS licensure (which needs to be verified - I'm not going to do that now, but somebody should) is October 2021, right in the middle of when he's supposed to be working as a consultant at Pfizer. What's that about?
3) all his research is on urology and is very very basic - not someone a recruiter would look at and consider a candidate for a brilliant research or consulting career. Of course, there the equity and inclusion factor, but still...
4) On the match list from 2018 it says he went to USC, but his resume says UT and Yale, no mention of USC
5) the match list says he matched with a program at Tufts Medical Center and the USNews profile says he did a urology residency there 2018-2020 but his resume says he was a resident at Mass General (a Harvard hospital) June 2018-Nov 2019.
7) The timing of his various academic and professional positions doesn't add up. On his resume under experience it says 6 years, but he only worked as a consultant starting in November 2021 and had a year of work 2013-2014, presumably before medical school (whichever one he might have attended - or not?)
8) none of the people he follows or who follow him are people of color. You might say this is a racist comment, but in my experience with friends who are in different racial communities, there is usually at least a 50% representation of their own racial group in their social media friend community, and usually much higher.
9) his pinterest profile has nothing that looks like he actually pinned - all totally generic
10) There is absolutely nothing about this guy before 2019 that says top pharma exec in charge or worldwide operations. Highly, highly suspicious.
Doubt they were played. They vet and vet and vet again. The wired person was a former Pfizer employee. His licenses and certifications are on line and can be seen at Jaime Jessop’s stack.
Lots of disnfo flowing. This helps set the record straight, plus more coming from PV today. If you listened to the Twitter Spaces last night you heard that he was talking to ANOTHER Pfizer employee that he was on a "date" with. https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker?
Go through all these comments and see how many utterly fail to realize that Walker is the perfect DEI hire. It makes perfect sense that he was brought straight in to an upper level role at Pfizer as a DEI poster child, with little or no experience to warrant him getting the job. That's how DEI works.
Once there, of course he would be privy to management meetings and other internal communications. If you've never worked in management at a big company you have no idea.
A bunch of you need to realize that just because many former "conspiracy theories" have come true, it doesn't mean that there isn't still a bunch of loony tunes shit out there.
Just another hired gun to do the bidding for Big Pharma. What needs to be exposed is the coordination between Big Pharma and the CDC/Darpa/DOD/CIA consortium that are going down the biowarfare route in lock step for fun and profit. If you have not read my article $$MOTIVATION$$.
A lot of people have suggested over the years the vaccines put pressure on the virus to mutate along with their new pharma antivirals like Molnupiravir and Paxlovid. Now they may have discredited a lot of people that have put this out there.
Not a hoax degrees confirmed as well as employment history. Apparently he worked at Boston Consulting Group and was "loaned" to Pfizer. George Webb id full of sh*t.
Hi Brian, to me it looks like nothing in his bio adds up.
Here are some inconsistencies and strangenesses about all the info on Walker you provided: (I'm of the opinion that he might very well be a fake, so we need to be very very careful - I write for Brownstone https://brownstone.org/author/debbie-lerman/, in case you need my Covid warrior bonafides.)
1) Why all the aliases? I've never met a legitimate doctor with so many different name combos
2) in the May 18, 2020 article about Covid treatments, his name as an author is listed without an MD (whereas one of the other authors has it), although he supposedly graduated from Med School in 2018.
2) His date of NYS licensure (which needs to be verified - I'm not going to do that now, but somebody should) is October 2021, right in the middle of when he's supposed to be working as a consultant at Pfizer. What's that about?
3) all his research is on urology and is very very basic - not someone a recruiter would look at and consider a candidate for a brilliant research or consulting career. Of course, there the equity and inclusion factor, but still...
4) On the match list from 2018 it says he went to USC, but his resume says UT and Yale, no mention of USC
5) the match list says he matched with a program at Tufts Medical Center and the USNews profile says he did a urology residency there 2018-2020 but his resume says he was a resident at Mass General (a Harvard hospital) June 2018-Nov 2019.
7) The timing of his various academic and professional positions doesn't add up. On his resume under experience it says 6 years, but he only worked as a consultant starting in November 2021 and had a year of work 2013-2014, presumably before medical school (whichever one he might have attended - or not?)
8) none of the people he follows or who follow him are people of color. You might say this is a racist comment, but in my experience with friends who are in different racial communities, there is usually at least a 50% representation of their own racial group in their social media friend community, and usually much higher.
9) his pinterest profile has nothing that looks like he actually pinned - all totally generic
10) There is absolutely nothing about this guy before 2019 that says top pharma exec in charge or worldwide operations. Highly, highly suspicious.
The bottom line is if you go to the 2017 Nature paper cited and hover over his name on the authors list his credentials as described by PV are there. Whoever the author of the reply is posting nonsense.. Pfizer is going to great lenghths to discredit the article as it is an existential threat to there existence.
Thanks for this - it is EXACTLY what I was thinking as the various SSers I follow rejoiced and regurgitated this obvious lie.
The PR Team is clever - and devious --- and they will do anything to keep the mob off the scent of what they are really up to.
They want the mob to believe this is about $$$$$.
Notice how they allow Fizzer to dramatically increase the price of each dose of Rat Juice.... the anti vaxxers look at that and say -- yep - it's all about $$$ and greed.
And now they plant this clown who admits it's about the endless $$$ train.
OK. I’m a former senior pharma exec. This guy was not in research. He won’t have published any papers.
He was in product strategy, which is essentially working out how to allocate capital across your portfolio (in studies, marketing, launches or M&A). These people have an overview of what’s happening in R&D but never do any R or D.
Thanks for the comment.
In fact, there is a Jordon Walker from the Dept of Urology at UT Southwestern in Dallas with several published papers.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28117384/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27601966/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27601966/
Using the recruiting search tool SignalHire, there is a profile for one Jordon Walker with the associated title at Pfizer with a prior career posting at the Dept of Urology at UT-Southwestern (it's where he complete medical school)
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/pfizer-doc-said-the-quiet-part-out
Understood...but why they need an MD foe that?
Also in this space, there is no shortage of MDs in marketing and in marketing adjacent roles. From conversations with people over the years, they just don't like being in medicine as much, but lean into what they know. Luckily companies play plenty and even have it as basically a prerequisite for roles like being a MSL.
For an example, if you search for job postings in pharma for director level, anything more senior, and medical roles an MD is almost a requirement. Though PhD and Masters can also pass.
They don’t. But you’ll find MDs aplenty in marketing, strategy, trial design, investment banking, equity research, consulting ....lots of people train as physicians and then discover patients are icky and get a nice job in front of a computer.
Other people in these strategy roles are scientists (who don’t like labs), former equity analysts & bankers & consultants.
Makes sense. Thx.
That makes him a decisionmaker
No, wrong demeaner.
Agree!
Sadly, I really think so.
Attorney Jeff Childers agrees with you, 2SG:
An excerpt from his commentary:
“Walker’s interview comments confirmed just about everything we’ve long suspected about pharma. In fact, his claims are so believable that it is also unbelievable. It’s an explosive story tailor-made for conservative conspiracy television. In fact, it’s SO believably unbelievable that some people literally don’t believe it and think Project Veritas — and the rest of rightwing media — are being set up to be totally discredited.
In other words, it seems too good to be true. If I were suing Pfizer and someone sent me all these materials, I would be EXTREMELY cautious about running straight to court with it. I would want to triple-check it first. You could lose the lawsuit if it turned out to be fake.”
Then he points out how much of what Walker claims about himself, for example, graduating from Yale, can’t be verified, among many other points.
☕️ DIRECTED SIMULATIONS ☙ Thursday, January 26, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/directed-simulations-thursday-january
This story needed to be handled with much more caution than it was, and my head spins from all the potential implications this could have, regarding PV’s reliability.
They haven't isolated anything, so what are they mutating?
The virus narrative is the key to spreading fear, while it's all a poisoning of nanotechnology.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studieshttps://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies
Why do people look in the wrong direction instead of looking into the heart of this crime?
Graphene and other nanotechnology poisons and kills people.
Mutating computer models to use in creating new poisons and fake pandemics.
I'm beginning to question the graphene thing though.
Same on graphene. Cholesterol has same visual which might explain the photographs of “chip like structures” and crappy needles slough off metallics which might further explain visual stuff and and also possibly spectrometry “evidence” ...
All that said, it is a long wet dream of pharma to use GO as an adjuvant so I am suspicious... a rush job to “stop a deadly pandemic” might provide perfect cover for testing out your dream poison
COVID has the exact characteristics as acute oxidative stress due to graphene/nanotechnology toxicity.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/what-is-covid-damp-squib-or-what
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-conspiracy
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-courious-case-of-covid-19-graphene
https://outraged.substack.com/p/problem-and-solution
https://outraged.substack.com/p/this-is-not-spike-protein
https://outraged.substack.com/p/is-it-a-virus-or-is-it-graphene-toxicity
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
Just search for images: "graphene masks." All masks contain it, and people must not inhale asbestos like poison.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-conspiracy
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies
There was already enough from Webb himself on Malone’s reliability to raise a red flag. The fact that this was pushed so hard so fast was another red flag. I am thrilled however that a lot more people are questioning the force-feeding now than in the past.
Sorry, this is George Webb of Q fame? I laughed when I saw him pop up again. I think he's the trickster.
webb went after dr. richard fleming which is a big red flag, tagged him with the felon label, big tell.
not a reliable source IMO. here's brian o'shea's take https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker
Check out Latypova’s response:
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/omg-pfizer-is-mutating-covid?r=gse79&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Yeah just read. It's a pretty nuanced take on but not surprising given her stance on things.
That's one smart cookie right there!
Yeah...George gets the players right but not necessarily the script. Been following him from the beginning and he has his limits for sure.
Here is a comment left on the O’shea article. Seems to be pretty sure hes fugazi.—
Hi Brian, to me it looks like nothing in his bio adds up.
Here are some inconsistencies and strangenesses about all the info on Walker you provided: (I'm of the opinion that he might very well be a fake, so we need to be very very careful - I write for Brownstone https://brownstone.org/author/debbie-lerman/, in case you need my Covid warrior bonafides.)
1) Why all the aliases? I've never met a legitimate doctor with so many different name combos
2) in the May 18, 2020 article about Covid treatments, his name as an author is listed without an MD (whereas one of the other authors has it), although he supposedly graduated from Med School in 2018.
2) His date of NYS licensure (which needs to be verified - I'm not going to do that now, but somebody should) is October 2021, right in the middle of when he's supposed to be working as a consultant at Pfizer. What's that about?
3) all his research is on urology and is very very basic - not someone a recruiter would look at and consider a candidate for a brilliant research or consulting career. Of course, there the equity and inclusion factor, but still...
4) On the match list from 2018 it says he went to USC, but his resume says UT and Yale, no mention of USC
5) the match list says he matched with a program at Tufts Medical Center and the USNews profile says he did a urology residency there 2018-2020 but his resume says he was a resident at Mass General (a Harvard hospital) June 2018-Nov 2019.
6) Urology residencies are extremely hard to get into and are FIVE YEARS long. https://www.massgeneral.org/urology/education-and-training/harvard-urologic-surgery-residency-program.
Did he drop out after a year?
7) The timing of his various academic and professional positions doesn't add up. On his resume under experience it says 6 years, but he only worked as a consultant starting in November 2021 and had a year of work 2013-2014, presumably before medical school (whichever one he might have attended - or not?)
8) none of the people he follows or who follow him are people of color. You might say this is a racist comment, but in my experience with friends who are in different racial communities, there is usually at least a 50% representation of their own racial group in their social media friend community, and usually much higher.
9) his pinterest profile has nothing that looks like he actually pinned - all totally generic
10) There is absolutely nothing about this guy before 2019 that says top pharma exec in charge or worldwide operations. Highly, highly suspicious.
Doubt they were played. They vet and vet and vet again. The wired person was a former Pfizer employee. His licenses and certifications are on line and can be seen at Jaime Jessop’s stack.
And here.
https://t.co/5s1cjz6Pco
I still trust Pfizer, as much as I trust gates. And gates is a pile of shit
Now this is a good take!
Lots of disnfo flowing. This helps set the record straight, plus more coming from PV today. If you listened to the Twitter Spaces last night you heard that he was talking to ANOTHER Pfizer employee that he was on a "date" with. https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker?
Thank you. I didn't have time to listen to the twitter live stream last night and this Walker guy's personality is confusing AF.
Go through all these comments and see how many utterly fail to realize that Walker is the perfect DEI hire. It makes perfect sense that he was brought straight in to an upper level role at Pfizer as a DEI poster child, with little or no experience to warrant him getting the job. That's how DEI works.
Once there, of course he would be privy to management meetings and other internal communications. If you've never worked in management at a big company you have no idea.
A bunch of you need to realize that just because many former "conspiracy theories" have come true, it doesn't mean that there isn't still a bunch of loony tunes shit out there.
Just another hired gun to do the bidding for Big Pharma. What needs to be exposed is the coordination between Big Pharma and the CDC/Darpa/DOD/CIA consortium that are going down the biowarfare route in lock step for fun and profit. If you have not read my article $$MOTIVATION$$.
Please do. https://thomasabraunrph.substack.com/p/motivation
A lot of people have suggested over the years the vaccines put pressure on the virus to mutate along with their new pharma antivirals like Molnupiravir and Paxlovid. Now they may have discredited a lot of people that have put this out there.
Kim Dotcam is a huge Jacinda Ardene fan. That’s a huge red flag for credibility.
Is he really? Dont know too much about him but thats very surprising from what ive seen from him. Wow.
He tweeted his support when she resigned.
Nah. He really IS that stupid. Certain "boxes" were ticked in HR and upwards and onwards!
Not a hoax degrees confirmed as well as employment history. Apparently he worked at Boston Consulting Group and was "loaned" to Pfizer. George Webb id full of sh*t.
https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker?r=fsmqc&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Degrees mean absolutely nothing.
Hi Brian, to me it looks like nothing in his bio adds up.
Here are some inconsistencies and strangenesses about all the info on Walker you provided: (I'm of the opinion that he might very well be a fake, so we need to be very very careful - I write for Brownstone https://brownstone.org/author/debbie-lerman/, in case you need my Covid warrior bonafides.)
1) Why all the aliases? I've never met a legitimate doctor with so many different name combos
2) in the May 18, 2020 article about Covid treatments, his name as an author is listed without an MD (whereas one of the other authors has it), although he supposedly graduated from Med School in 2018.
2) His date of NYS licensure (which needs to be verified - I'm not going to do that now, but somebody should) is October 2021, right in the middle of when he's supposed to be working as a consultant at Pfizer. What's that about?
3) all his research is on urology and is very very basic - not someone a recruiter would look at and consider a candidate for a brilliant research or consulting career. Of course, there the equity and inclusion factor, but still...
4) On the match list from 2018 it says he went to USC, but his resume says UT and Yale, no mention of USC
5) the match list says he matched with a program at Tufts Medical Center and the USNews profile says he did a urology residency there 2018-2020 but his resume says he was a resident at Mass General (a Harvard hospital) June 2018-Nov 2019.
6) Urology residencies are extremely hard to get into and are FIVE YEARS long. https://www.massgeneral.org/urology/education-and-training/harvard-urologic-surgery-residency-program.
Did he drop out after a year?
7) The timing of his various academic and professional positions doesn't add up. On his resume under experience it says 6 years, but he only worked as a consultant starting in November 2021 and had a year of work 2013-2014, presumably before medical school (whichever one he might have attended - or not?)
8) none of the people he follows or who follow him are people of color. You might say this is a racist comment, but in my experience with friends who are in different racial communities, there is usually at least a 50% representation of their own racial group in their social media friend community, and usually much higher.
9) his pinterest profile has nothing that looks like he actually pinned - all totally generic
10) There is absolutely nothing about this guy before 2019 that says top pharma exec in charge or worldwide operations. Highly, highly suspicious.
Also, why hasn't youtube taken down the video yet? Accusing Pfizer of high crimes is suddenly okay with them?
I copied this reply from the O’shea aticle, its not me.
The bottom line is if you go to the 2017 Nature paper cited and hover over his name on the authors list his credentials as described by PV are there. Whoever the author of the reply is posting nonsense.. Pfizer is going to great lenghths to discredit the article as it is an existential threat to there existence.
Ok. The person who replied claims to be from Brownstone, they are pretty reliable. I guess they are mistaken or are a fake,
Hope this helps.
https://open.substack.com/pub/brianoshea/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker?utm_source=direct&r=o86e9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The whole thing makes more sense if it was a set up. They have poor calibre staff at Pfizer if he's an example of their highest echelons.
Thanks for this - it is EXACTLY what I was thinking as the various SSers I follow rejoiced and regurgitated this obvious lie.
The PR Team is clever - and devious --- and they will do anything to keep the mob off the scent of what they are really up to.
They want the mob to believe this is about $$$$$.
Notice how they allow Fizzer to dramatically increase the price of each dose of Rat Juice.... the anti vaxxers look at that and say -- yep - it's all about $$$ and greed.
And now they plant this clown who admits it's about the endless $$$ train.
This is not about money - it is an extermination campaign cuz https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220