17 Comments
тна Return to thread

An obvious question that no one seems to be asking is why someone decided to test cows for bird flu, especially when it has been reported that this virus has never before been seen in cattle and that most of the infected animals don't develop serious symptoms.

Expand full comment

A concocted rationale to cull cattle. Epic double win, no more chicken, eggs, beef or milk.

Expand full comment

Yep. Culling the food supply

Expand full comment

Well....they might not cull the cattle herd..

Crazy, paranoid reasoning:

mRNA can potentially cause prions. Prions can't be destroyed, and cause literal holes in your brain tissue. It's not pleasant for you or your loved ones:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/creutzfeldt-jakob-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20371226#symptoms

If you want to cull the human herd, simply give the cows mRNA shots, send them to market, and let Big Pharma get richer treating a disease that will kill you within a year or sooner. It's a win-win!

Expand full comment

My husband is a chemist and a fan of Kary Mullis-- for the record Mullis hated Fauci.

Basically, if you do enough cycles of a PCR test, you can get any result you want.

As for testing the cows... how do we know they even did that and that they simply didn't infect the cow with pinkeye?

Expand full comment

Yes, I am aware of flaws with the PCR test. And we don't know if any cows were tested.

Expand full comment

I thought I read somewhere that bird poop or bird litter is in cattle feed.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure if that's true. The FDA announced that it would ban poultry litter in feed twenty years ago, and even then I'd be surprised if it was all that common. Poultry litter contains all sorts of contaminants, including antibiotic residues. Antibiotics must be withdrawn for a certain amount of time (depending on the species) before an animal is butchered or before its milk can be sold.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 14
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Not all cows and chickens. They'll still have plenty of delicious meat for themselves after we're dead.

Expand full comment

That's why it's important to ask the obvious questions. Most farms run on a tight budgets. As a rule, farmers don't call in a vet unless it's a disease they can't diagnose and/or treat on their own. This is especially true if there are no serious symptoms. Dairies also don't test milk for viruses. They test for bacteria. So yes, this sounds like a load of bs (pun not intended).

Expand full comment

The fda isnтАЩt waiting to be invited to farms тАФ they show up when they want to, and force the phony PCR test on animals under the pretense of public health. Even without symptoms of illness, they can declare a farm unsafe and cull everything at will. And the farmer has no recourse.

Expand full comment

Don't you mean the USDA?

I did a little more digging and found that they started monitoring dairy farms because a person who worked on a Texas dairy farm allegedly tested positive for bird flu. That was the excuse they used to start testing.

What I see going on is the creation of more regulations in the name of "biosecurity" that will increase the costs of running these farms and run more farms out of business.

https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2024/05/10/usda-hhs-announce-new-actions-reduce-impact-and-spread-h5n1

Expand full comment

Either way, the formula is in place. Apparently no one is willing to stand their ground and stop the madness.

Expand full comment

Or people are standing their ground and we're not hearing about it. The whole thing sounds made up to me.

Expand full comment

ItтАЩs all BS.

Expand full comment