Well Jimychanga, for one there is no virus so there are no weaponised viri so there is no need for vexines. For two, he is not pointing to DOD which ran the whole thing. WHO is a red herring. Three, he is a Mason and tattooed with the all seeing eye which unavoidably means that he is one of them. He tells a partial truth but obscures so much more.
Interesting points. Agree to disagree on the "virus". I think there was definitely a bioengineered part 1 followed by a weaponized vax Part II, in addition to all the deliberately fuzzy math and rundeathisnear/ventilator killings to inflate the death count early on.
the "virus" piece is regarding the normative understanding of "germ theory" which has germs and viruses causing disease. an expanding idea is that germs and viruses are created as a result of disease or decay and that toxins or poisons and nutritional imbalances are the true cause of disease. If one digs into the PROOF of viruses exist IN THE CONTEXT we have been taught - acting as we are told they are - there is actually none. Hard to believe, but the demonstration is usually circular and illogical.
The idea (or initial conjecture) that microbes cause disease is a hypothesis and the idea was prematurely elevated to a scientific theory. Arriving at a premature theory is one intellectual demonstration that both scientists and the general public have an extremely challenging time with understanding what genuine science, utilizing the scientific method, actually IS. There is a genuine scientific debate happening right now about the legitimacy & validity of the germ hypothesis. ItтАЩs mind boggling that so many people -- scientists and non-scientists (who consider themselves to be scientifically literate) alike -- are so indoctrinated and brainwashed into becoming true believers that (so-called) тАЬgerm theoryтАЭ is settled science and that the debate is over.
I think that itтАЩs way Way WAY too late for science to save the day for humanity. Too many intellectuals in the STEM fields are too corrupted. Too many scientists have abandoned the philosophy of science and have abandoned the scientific method in favor of science-by-consensus. In my opinion, the consensus is predetermined by those who fund the research. If research doesnтАЩt corroborate what the grant funders want to know (or knowledge they can use), the research is buried.
I donтАЩt trust whatтАЩs called тАЬthe ScienceтАЭ anymore.
I agree with you that the confirmation of the hypothesis that germs cause disease is more often than not various failures of logic, aka logical fallacies.
I guess that I rarely trust human reasoning and human critical analysis anymore. I think that (overall) humanity is in cognitive decline. Overall, weтАЩre getting senile and demented.
so many external factors seem to be leading to this decline. And since science is so much more about funding these days, it, like most else, has found itself corrupted.
Yet more seem to be expanding their awareness. My guess is there will be true overstepping which will mute the drip drip drip and slow raising of the temperature in the pot and show in a way virtually impossible to unsee what almost are complicit with. How long
for that, who knows. It comes closer yet the plate spinning has been quite masterful.
This conversation likely would have been quite different 2 years ago. In that I find hope.
and the question keeps falling to "what to do..." how do I respond in a meaningful way? we have been excessively programmed to believe that lives (and our own lives especially) are precious, so we become enslaved to remain g alive, even when a life of slavery may not be truly worth living. I have been programmed to seek comfort and convenience and avoid pain and difficulty. The short term takes priority over the long term.
So I kick the can down the road, unwilling to commit to change, making postings and gnashing my teeth occasionally in annoyance.
I am taking small steps: i am not complying with illegal and non-sensical mandates or restrictions to my fundamental liberties. I am willing to accept the unpleasant outcomes that may result.
I am reducing my complicity by consuming less, and being more intentional of what
i do consume and the organizations that provide those goods and services
that my transactions support.
I am also eating more whole foods and purchasing much less manufactured or processed foods.
I am becoming more fit and making my body string so that i am more resilient.
I prepare my home to support me should the clearly frail supply chains become undone.
I don't give as much time, attention, and focus to that which is profiteering on it and clearly out to get me.
i donate to causes that support my values
I support others (i invest my time) in my community in ways that allow for personal
growth.
I spend far less time debating with others who are "wrong" and instead seek to see commonality and mutual needs.
My belief is that by preparing myself and being a part of my community I will enable myself and others to act more resolutely should the opportunity or need present itself.
At some point, i and others will have had enough will have been pushed too far and the attempts to control and enslave so brazen that not responding leads to a future so devoid of value that any risks to treasure or security or bodily harm are worthwhile.
That's the how - step outside of the system. let it operate without me. and trust others to do the same. when a tipping point is reached, oppression will ramp up and others will make a new choice for themselves.
I truly believe we have the society we deserve - the one we allow. When enough are willing to risk then change can come.
and who wants to lose what we have worked so hard for so long to obtain? the "at what cost" bar keeps being raised or lowered, depending on your perspective.
I believe that there are many people who have worked out that no virus has ever been isolated. There is a lot of literature 'out there'. I saw a doco on the Gardisil vax and the evidence they used to link genital warts to cervical cancer is an absolute joke. So much of what is called 'science' is actually a giant leap of faith - connecting dots that have no apparent connection.
I do read there often. Just donтАЩt recall him saying that. If they are in on it, then we all are f***d. I mean who is on the side if humanity then?? Are there enough of the good guys to save us?
FWIW, I donтАЩt believe (trust, have faith in) that the people who are generally considered to be the тАЬleadersтАЭ of the Medical Freedom Movement are all that тАЬgoodтАЭ (or righteous, or just). I donтАЩt consider them тАЬbadтАЭ, like theyтАЩre (so-called) тАЬcontrolled oppositionтАЭ or whatever. I simply believe that the leaders -- such as David Martin and Robert Malone and RFK Jr -- are still deceived and deluded. (And I very well could be wrong about this, that IтАЩm making hasty judgements or coming to hasty conclusions.)
If David Martin is part of Freemasonry, thatтАЩs problematic. So too with MaloneтАЩs connections with various national security and intelligence agencies. So too with RFKтАЩs connections with the eco-fascists.
тАЬWho precisely is on the side of humanity?тАЭ is an excellent question worth delving into.
No matter whether David Martin is telling the entire truth or not--if just a few more people listen to him and wake up and open their eyes, then we're better off than we were. The main weapon we have is the truth, and to open people's eyes to what is going on.
IтАЩd merely prefer unadulterated truth to truth mixed together with untruths.
I recently read a scathing critique of David Martin, so IтАЩm trying to understand MartinтАЩs value as a truth-teller. For me personally, itтАЩs about MartinтАЩs hidden agenda and his motives.
We are the only ones on the side of humanity. There are no good guys coming to save us. That just happens in movies - this is real life. We must save ourselves. Just about everyone/thing in the public domain has been hijacked. Once you actually open your mind to that, you will eventually feel calmer because you can shut out all that 'noise' and focus on what is really achievable and what is really important. We don't need 'leaders', we never did - they just convinced us that we did. We are 7-8 billion people strong, they are 8,000 strong (someone else's guess, but quite possibly correct).
Can anyone fill me in on why Doc Martin is a huge Freemason and why Dr Yeadon says he's in on all of it and not to be trusted? Genuinely confused. Tx
Well Jimychanga, for one there is no virus so there are no weaponised viri so there is no need for vexines. For two, he is not pointing to DOD which ran the whole thing. WHO is a red herring. Three, he is a Mason and tattooed with the all seeing eye which unavoidably means that he is one of them. He tells a partial truth but obscures so much more.
Interesting points. Agree to disagree on the "virus". I think there was definitely a bioengineered part 1 followed by a weaponized vax Part II, in addition to all the deliberately fuzzy math and rundeathisnear/ventilator killings to inflate the death count early on.
the "virus" piece is regarding the normative understanding of "germ theory" which has germs and viruses causing disease. an expanding idea is that germs and viruses are created as a result of disease or decay and that toxins or poisons and nutritional imbalances are the true cause of disease. If one digs into the PROOF of viruses exist IN THE CONTEXT we have been taught - acting as we are told they are - there is actually none. Hard to believe, but the demonstration is usually circular and illogical.
The idea (or initial conjecture) that microbes cause disease is a hypothesis and the idea was prematurely elevated to a scientific theory. Arriving at a premature theory is one intellectual demonstration that both scientists and the general public have an extremely challenging time with understanding what genuine science, utilizing the scientific method, actually IS. There is a genuine scientific debate happening right now about the legitimacy & validity of the germ hypothesis. ItтАЩs mind boggling that so many people -- scientists and non-scientists (who consider themselves to be scientifically literate) alike -- are so indoctrinated and brainwashed into becoming true believers that (so-called) тАЬgerm theoryтАЭ is settled science and that the debate is over.
I think that itтАЩs way Way WAY too late for science to save the day for humanity. Too many intellectuals in the STEM fields are too corrupted. Too many scientists have abandoned the philosophy of science and have abandoned the scientific method in favor of science-by-consensus. In my opinion, the consensus is predetermined by those who fund the research. If research doesnтАЩt corroborate what the grant funders want to know (or knowledge they can use), the research is buried.
I donтАЩt trust whatтАЩs called тАЬthe ScienceтАЭ anymore.
I agree with you that the confirmation of the hypothesis that germs cause disease is more often than not various failures of logic, aka logical fallacies.
I guess that I rarely trust human reasoning and human critical analysis anymore. I think that (overall) humanity is in cognitive decline. Overall, weтАЩre getting senile and demented.
so many external factors seem to be leading to this decline. And since science is so much more about funding these days, it, like most else, has found itself corrupted.
Yet more seem to be expanding their awareness. My guess is there will be true overstepping which will mute the drip drip drip and slow raising of the temperature in the pot and show in a way virtually impossible to unsee what almost are complicit with. How long
for that, who knows. It comes closer yet the plate spinning has been quite masterful.
This conversation likely would have been quite different 2 years ago. In that I find hope.
Thanks for writing about more people expanding our awareness. ThatтАЩs luminous. My post was pretty bleak.
and the question keeps falling to "what to do..." how do I respond in a meaningful way? we have been excessively programmed to believe that lives (and our own lives especially) are precious, so we become enslaved to remain g alive, even when a life of slavery may not be truly worth living. I have been programmed to seek comfort and convenience and avoid pain and difficulty. The short term takes priority over the long term.
So I kick the can down the road, unwilling to commit to change, making postings and gnashing my teeth occasionally in annoyance.
I am taking small steps: i am not complying with illegal and non-sensical mandates or restrictions to my fundamental liberties. I am willing to accept the unpleasant outcomes that may result.
I am reducing my complicity by consuming less, and being more intentional of what
i do consume and the organizations that provide those goods and services
that my transactions support.
I am also eating more whole foods and purchasing much less manufactured or processed foods.
I am becoming more fit and making my body string so that i am more resilient.
I prepare my home to support me should the clearly frail supply chains become undone.
I don't give as much time, attention, and focus to that which is profiteering on it and clearly out to get me.
i donate to causes that support my values
I support others (i invest my time) in my community in ways that allow for personal
growth.
I spend far less time debating with others who are "wrong" and instead seek to see commonality and mutual needs.
My belief is that by preparing myself and being a part of my community I will enable myself and others to act more resolutely should the opportunity or need present itself.
At some point, i and others will have had enough will have been pushed too far and the attempts to control and enslave so brazen that not responding leads to a future so devoid of value that any risks to treasure or security or bodily harm are worthwhile.
That's the how - step outside of the system. let it operate without me. and trust others to do the same. when a tipping point is reached, oppression will ramp up and others will make a new choice for themselves.
I truly believe we have the society we deserve - the one we allow. When enough are willing to risk then change can come.
I agree with you that we have been socially conditioned to be risk averse, to conform. тАЬSafety firstтАЭ and all that rot.
and who wants to lose what we have worked so hard for so long to obtain? the "at what cost" bar keeps being raised or lowered, depending on your perspective.
I believe that there are many people who have worked out that no virus has ever been isolated. There is a lot of literature 'out there'. I saw a doco on the Gardisil vax and the evidence they used to link genital warts to cervical cancer is an absolute joke. So much of what is called 'science' is actually a giant leap of faith - connecting dots that have no apparent connection.
I never heard Dr Yeadon say that.
If you have telegram follow Dr Mike Yeadon -everything you dont want to know is there Martin as well as RFK are all involved
I do read there often. Just donтАЩt recall him saying that. If they are in on it, then we all are f***d. I mean who is on the side if humanity then?? Are there enough of the good guys to save us?
FWIW, I donтАЩt believe (trust, have faith in) that the people who are generally considered to be the тАЬleadersтАЭ of the Medical Freedom Movement are all that тАЬgoodтАЭ (or righteous, or just). I donтАЩt consider them тАЬbadтАЭ, like theyтАЩre (so-called) тАЬcontrolled oppositionтАЭ or whatever. I simply believe that the leaders -- such as David Martin and Robert Malone and RFK Jr -- are still deceived and deluded. (And I very well could be wrong about this, that IтАЩm making hasty judgements or coming to hasty conclusions.)
If David Martin is part of Freemasonry, thatтАЩs problematic. So too with MaloneтАЩs connections with various national security and intelligence agencies. So too with RFKтАЩs connections with the eco-fascists.
тАЬWho precisely is on the side of humanity?тАЭ is an excellent question worth delving into.
No matter whether David Martin is telling the entire truth or not--if just a few more people listen to him and wake up and open their eyes, then we're better off than we were. The main weapon we have is the truth, and to open people's eyes to what is going on.
IтАЩd merely prefer unadulterated truth to truth mixed together with untruths.
I recently read a scathing critique of David Martin, so IтАЩm trying to understand MartinтАЩs value as a truth-teller. For me personally, itтАЩs about MartinтАЩs hidden agenda and his motives.
We are the only ones on the side of humanity. There are no good guys coming to save us. That just happens in movies - this is real life. We must save ourselves. Just about everyone/thing in the public domain has been hijacked. Once you actually open your mind to that, you will eventually feel calmer because you can shut out all that 'noise' and focus on what is really achievable and what is really important. We don't need 'leaders', we never did - they just convinced us that we did. We are 7-8 billion people strong, they are 8,000 strong (someone else's guess, but quite possibly correct).
I'll try to dig more, but I'm getting same message from several readers
Me either. If he did, I would like to see a link to it.