FWIW, I don’t believe (trust, have faith in) that the people who are generally considered to be the “leaders” of the Medical Freedom Movement are all that “good” (or righteous, or just). I don’t consider them “bad”, like they’re (so-called) “controlled opposition” or whatever. I simply believe that the leaders -- such as David Martin and…
FWIW, I don’t believe (trust, have faith in) that the people who are generally considered to be the “leaders” of the Medical Freedom Movement are all that “good” (or righteous, or just). I don’t consider them “bad”, like they’re (so-called) “controlled opposition” or whatever. I simply believe that the leaders -- such as David Martin and Robert Malone and RFK Jr -- are still deceived and deluded. (And I very well could be wrong about this, that I’m making hasty judgements or coming to hasty conclusions.)
If David Martin is part of Freemasonry, that’s problematic. So too with Malone’s connections with various national security and intelligence agencies. So too with RFK’s connections with the eco-fascists.
“Who precisely is on the side of humanity?” is an excellent question worth delving into.
No matter whether David Martin is telling the entire truth or not--if just a few more people listen to him and wake up and open their eyes, then we're better off than we were. The main weapon we have is the truth, and to open people's eyes to what is going on.
I’d merely prefer unadulterated truth to truth mixed together with untruths.
I recently read a scathing critique of David Martin, so I’m trying to understand Martin’s value as a truth-teller. For me personally, it’s about Martin’s hidden agenda and his motives.
FWIW, I don’t believe (trust, have faith in) that the people who are generally considered to be the “leaders” of the Medical Freedom Movement are all that “good” (or righteous, or just). I don’t consider them “bad”, like they’re (so-called) “controlled opposition” or whatever. I simply believe that the leaders -- such as David Martin and Robert Malone and RFK Jr -- are still deceived and deluded. (And I very well could be wrong about this, that I’m making hasty judgements or coming to hasty conclusions.)
If David Martin is part of Freemasonry, that’s problematic. So too with Malone’s connections with various national security and intelligence agencies. So too with RFK’s connections with the eco-fascists.
“Who precisely is on the side of humanity?” is an excellent question worth delving into.
No matter whether David Martin is telling the entire truth or not--if just a few more people listen to him and wake up and open their eyes, then we're better off than we were. The main weapon we have is the truth, and to open people's eyes to what is going on.
I’d merely prefer unadulterated truth to truth mixed together with untruths.
I recently read a scathing critique of David Martin, so I’m trying to understand Martin’s value as a truth-teller. For me personally, it’s about Martin’s hidden agenda and his motives.