I would say that. What ever they were doing in that lab was not in fact gain of function but something to do with weaponising gene therapy. Yes, I have seen all the paperwork to support the NIH funding GOF at Wuhan, and I'll agree its very convincing and provides a wonderful red herring to those who would love everyone to believe and be …
I would say that. What ever they were doing in that lab was not in fact gain of function but something to do with weaponising gene therapy. Yes, I have seen all the paperwork to support the NIH funding GOF at Wuhan, and I'll agree its very convincing and provides a wonderful red herring to those who would love everyone to believe and be fixated on the false binary between lab release/wet market. When in actuality, there is no virus, just good old fraudulent PCR, propaganda, confirmation bias in doctors and patients alike and deadly injections.
I would say that. What ever they were doing in that lab was not in fact gain of function but something to do with weaponising gene therapy. Yes, I have seen all the paperwork to support the NIH funding GOF at Wuhan, and I'll agree its very convincing and provides a wonderful red herring to those who would love everyone to believe and be fixated on the false binary between lab release/wet market. When in actuality, there is no virus, just good old fraudulent PCR, propaganda, confirmation bias in doctors and patients alike and deadly injections.