Baxter who owns/runs RRN has always been a C Eye- A asset so I would not put too much weight into that site as it's clear it's DARPA site specifically for the purpose of mapping. A little digging will point clearly to not only non-truths/unsubstantiated articles but flat out lies. Like everyone else I wish it to be true, but unfortunately most of their stories are not.
Baxter who owns/runs RRN has always been a C Eye- A asset so I would not put too much weight into that site as it's clear it's DARPA site specifically for the purpose of mapping. A little digging will point clearly to not only non-truths/unsubstantiated articles but flat out lies. Like everyone else I wish it to be true, but unfortunately most of their stories are not.
Maybe so about Bax but I still can't help NOTICING that the monsters that have been apprehended are just not as visible in public as they were before. I've been following RRN for awhile and that has become blatant. That's the only thing I can put my finger on that leads me to rely on RRN as the real deal. Even if it isn't I enjoy Baxter's writing of each grab and details are never repetitive. Besides with today's information sources for substantiation, they are all compromised somewhat. If it wasn't for Mike Adams of Natural News or Joseph Mercola Mercola.com or channels on TELEGRAM there really are very few reliable sources. The substack.com writers are especially good IMO
Baxter who owns/runs RRN has always been a C Eye- A asset so I would not put too much weight into that site as it's clear it's DARPA site specifically for the purpose of mapping. A little digging will point clearly to not only non-truths/unsubstantiated articles but flat out lies. Like everyone else I wish it to be true, but unfortunately most of their stories are not.
Maybe so about Bax but I still can't help NOTICING that the monsters that have been apprehended are just not as visible in public as they were before. I've been following RRN for awhile and that has become blatant. That's the only thing I can put my finger on that leads me to rely on RRN as the real deal. Even if it isn't I enjoy Baxter's writing of each grab and details are never repetitive. Besides with today's information sources for substantiation, they are all compromised somewhat. If it wasn't for Mike Adams of Natural News or Joseph Mercola Mercola.com or channels on TELEGRAM there really are very few reliable sources. The substack.com writers are especially good IMO