83 Comments

Or...plot shift...this might have something to do with "origins." It would be prudent to start digging around into what was actually in those 2019 flu jabs that could have precipitated the entire pandemic. And we know that vaccines shed, especially the live-attenuated types that were used in the 2019-2020 flu season design, so one didn't need to receive the flu shot that year to have gotten very sick from it. And the 2019 flu jab used a known severe H3N2 variant that was hotly debated about its inclusion in the quadrivalent because it was known to be very severe. Here's some interesting information that may help connect some dots when paired with the study in the Rounding the Earth Substack link. And don't miss the November, 2019 CNN Fauci piece that is also very, very curious to consider given all that has transpired since.

- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:

https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-vaccine-available-for-2019-2020-flu-season

"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.

Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.

To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"

“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"

"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"

“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"

- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:

https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/20192020-influenza-vaccine-update

"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."

- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:

https://elemental.medium.com/inside-the-making-of-the-flu-vaccine-c5d6f8cd174c

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/who-vaccine-recommendations-are-used-pharmaceutical-companies-develop-produce-and-license-influenza

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/918053

***********************************************************************************************************

- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the CV story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/health/universal-flu-vaccine/index.html

"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."

"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.

The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.

Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."

"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.

“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”

That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.

“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."

How does the 2019 flu vaccine look like now? And how does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now?

And there is a strong correlation between the flu vaccine and Coronavirus susceptibility:

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-flu-vaccines-accidentally-reveal

Expand full comment

I personally believe they put it in the 2019 flu jab. Anyone remember when the flu jabs were only given in the fall during a short window of time? And only healthy adults were given them. And remember when pregnant women weren't allowed to have a flu jab. Well. I remember. I was a Longterm care Pharmacist for 30 years. I have watched the evolution of the marketing of the flu jabs for 30 years.

Now anyone can get a flu jab anyday of the year.

And in the fall when we did our bulk order for the nursing homes it was like clockwork. Two weeks later after all of the patients were jabbec then it was onto all the respiratory and antibiotic mess and steroids.

Expand full comment

Does anyone know how new drugs go to market once the patent run out? THE manufacturers change one small component of the chemical compound and ta da !! A brand new drug and new marketing and more money for them !!!

Expand full comment

Fall 2019 was the most prolific and strongest flu jab marketing I had ever seen

Expand full comment

So when you read those pharma industry publications and the CNN Fauci "ice cream cone approach," "just email me the virus protein" stories, along with the study in the Rounding the Earth Substack that shows strong correlation to the flu jab and severe covid outcomes do you find this presentation of information worthy of additional inquiry?

I do. And in a search for truth I believe we would be well advised to step outside the entire viral escape paradigm that's been constructed. Which isn't to say that the CIA's hands, DOD/CDC/Big Pharma (redundant) hands are clean. Just that they may very well be hiding the pea under a different shell. We go barking up the theoretical designer virus tree, while they pat themselves on the back at how clever they've been to hide the most obvious delivery system for an infectious pathogen in plain sight. Knowing we're chasing vapors.

Who knows, maybe this plot I've identified can be honestly debunked. I don't know it to be true. But I have deep suspicions, given all the circumstantial and observational correlations that are there. But only those with the resources to do a full investigation will be able to do that. And all of the investigatory resources being devoted to one paradigm leaves this possibility unexamined. Unwisely so, imho.

Expand full comment

I have had this hypothesis since spring of 2020. Only if someone had those old 2019 flu jabs in cold storage somewhere.. Note: the Italian group who had a high death rate in the beginning of the "pandemic" also had an autopsy study done on them. One could compare those autopsy reports to the current "died suddenly" autopsy reports. bookends.

Expand full comment

it follows the time line and is an excellent way to release a biologic onto an unsuspecting population

Expand full comment

The Rounding the Earth Stack I link to has information that may be helpful.

Expand full comment

I've read and shared studies before that show PCR tests are able to distinguish between flu vaccine types and years and where they were used.

I went to the NIH library website, searched for PCR, influenza & vaccine pairings. Many returns. But mostly on horses - I suspect they now censor human results but leave the animal ones.

The horse flu vaccines reveal their capability to know this information from samples. And I rather suspect they would reveal the origins of all positive samples that match back to flu or covid vax type, year, where. It's not like they save the best technology for horses.

It's there. In the samples. Just need to measure and match to the known criteria in all of the 2019 flu jabs and all of the covid jabs. No doubt the 'variants' are specific vax derived.

Expand full comment

Do you think it was anthrax?

Expand full comment

I don't. My understanding of anthrax makes it a bad candidate for that application. Not the least of which is the hazard it poses to handlers.

Just a more infectious severe flu. For bioterror you only need a little bit of a biological threat, that a whole lot of manufactured terror takes and runs with. The flu vaccine wasn't meant to be the big killer, it was just the set-up. Their 'remedy' was.

Expand full comment

agree, I had a bad reaction from the 2019 flu jab and was told "it was COVID"...something was in that jab that made a lot of people sick

Expand full comment

09.19.2019

Trump signed an executive order for the new flu vaccine platform https://www.contagionlive.com/view/trump-issues-executive-order-on-influenza-vaccine-modernization

Expand full comment

Interesting, huh? I saw that mentioned in the CNN Fauci piece. Very interesting data point.

Expand full comment

The question is not that he signed it - yes that matters, but - who wrote it?

Why did they write it at all? Who pushed this? Who assisted in the crafting of 10 US Agencies that despised Trump to no end? Who was aware this was to be pitched.....FYI, it came just 7 days after Wuhan offlined their database on viruses. 9/12/19

So was the letter in the works or crafted in that week?

The Chief of Staff then: Mick Mulvaney would be the guy that knows all about this.

Lots of questions no asks of people regarding such precursory events.

Open Philanthropy - Dustin Moskovitz (FB) runs this - funded Event 201 & also funds SBF's mom Barbara Fried's Mind the Gap PAC on election registering. (FTX money started to flow into Fried's hands rather quickly after the founding in April 2019.)

In November 2019, according to Time, election disinfo was discussed w/9 civil rights leaders with Dorsey, Zuckerberg and Vanita Gupta (current 3rd highest DOJ official).

Pamela Karlan (Ukraine impeachment, FB board, latetr DOJ) ran an election class at Stanford (where Barbara works as well - on elections) with guests like Adam Schiff, Bill Clinton, Vanita Gupta, Steve Schmidt.... lots of muckymucks.

One knows the phrase: from Crisis comes Opportunity.

These a-holes were in my estimation much more designing than we barely know.

Expand full comment

same breed that sat around a table and devised gas ovens as the final solution

Expand full comment

"A human experiment on the effectiveness of the gas was conducted in January 1940. A number of senior officials responsible for Aktion T-4, including many asylum directors and several others who would later make their names infamous at Auschwitz, gathered at a defunct prison near Berlin. Approximately 20 naked asylum inmates were herded into a prototypical gas chamber by psychiatric nurses. The enthusiastic onlookers watched closely as the inmates died from carbon monoxide poisoning. Eight further inmates were administered lethal injections, but when the poison had little immediate effect, these inmates were gassed as well. Buoyed by the dreadful success he had just witnessed, Viktor Brack, one of the top Aktion T-4 officials, victoriously declared the importance of using physicians to administer the gas through his oft-repeated motto: "The needle belongs in the hand of the doctor."

Useless Eaters: Disability as Genocidal Marker in Nazi Germany

Catholic Culture, 2002

https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7019

Expand full comment

Yes. More context, thank you. So much more than we barely know. And the Wet Market bat/ Wuhan GOF/Escape, UNC, Peter Daszak, all of those theories seem a lot like wild goose chases that will never catch their quarry. None provable.

Now, 2019 flu vaccine origin of severe flu season, with the severe H3N2 LAV design, mammalian egg-based enough to launch the fear porn. Maintained with fake PCR tests and controlled media fear amplification, even as death toll from the 2019 flu jabs seasonally waned. Until the *real* bioweapon that is the mRNA jab was ready for eager arms. Kickstarted by the 2019 flu jab.

There's data around, Mathew Crawford's RTE piece I link to has more breadcrumbs. If enough sleuths shift from the wild goose chase of Wuhan into this line of inquiry we may find out much more.

Expand full comment

oh, and don't forget Dr. Birx stated in the spring of 2020 at one of the Whitehouse press conferences... "there is no more flu, it is Covid now" in her small quiet little voice. NO one batted an eye or an ear.

Expand full comment

I wish I could link your comment to Igor Chudov and Brian Mowrey, I would love to hear their input. Very fascinating hypothesis!

Expand full comment

As would I! I like and respect the work that both put out. I don't always concur, but more times than not I do. Even though sometimes Igor's ego comes out. I suppose mine does, too.

Expand full comment

Interestingly enough, Igor posted recently about how RSV escaped a US lab in 1955 and became endemic. Every single new virus should be now automatically be assumed to come from a lab!

Expand full comment

Igor has an ego? I think he is opinionated but a total teddy bear :)

Expand full comment

Lol! He does. I've run into it. I still respect his work.

Expand full comment

if this is not telling.. then I don't know what ? add this to your stack of source of pre-meditated bad science. They say it all in this video : From the Milken Institute.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kFJijSgXnQ

Expand full comment

I also find the study from the beginning of 2023 that Fauci coauthored where he admits the jabs for respiratory viruses like flu/cv don't work very telling. It said next they want to attack mucous membranes to "protect" us since internal immune system jabs are known to be so ineffective (Yet they still push jabs into us?!?! )

Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses

David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, Anthony S. Fauci

Cell Host Microbe, January 11, 2023

https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00572-8

It's not an especially long or difficult read. Makes the case for nasal spray and eye drop "vaccines." And it's not like those experimental nasal spray "vaccines" will be safe or effective, either. They'll attack the protection that our own beneficial mucosal microbiome provides and leave that which is 70% of our natural immune system vulnerable to all of the microbial pathogens swimming in the ocean of air we breathe. Much like how hand sanitizer is indiscriminate killers of our natural hand microbiome that protects us.

The aerosolized delivery format is also very helpful for the progression to "Come step into zee vaccine inhaaler vroom, no injection needed! Just stand under zis showver nozzle and breathe in deeply ven you zee da gas come out. Do you haf any gold tooth fillings?"

Expand full comment

I had come across an article from 2007, Fauci has been at this wanting to have a Universal Flu shot for a long long time. I can't find the link now. His evil is special.

Expand full comment

yes, the aerosolized version has been discussed. there already is one for the flu. the end game is to capture the adult market. and to re-brand their product. that is how pharmaceutical industry spins.

Expand full comment

You know the body scan chambers we go through in airports? Imagine a future where in order to travel and go through one they spritz an aersolized "vaccine" into your face, mandatory to travel, "it's not about you, it's about protecting others." But, customized dosages to your biometrics on file...along with your social credit score. Or a "Logan's Run" type deliver system.

The Nazi death camp commandants said it wasn't the killing of millions that was hard. It was the disposing of the bodies. Learning from history the eugenicists have decided to outsource that body disposal problem to surviving family members. With the benefit of less evidence at the scene of the crime, no fingerprints. It's really not that much of a stretch with developments in biotechnology.

Expand full comment

The customized-to-your-biometrics juice--enabled to what degree by the voluntary release of your DNA to 23 and Me? And if you yourself hadn't fallen into that trap, but your sibling did.....

Expand full comment

I could see that further down the line. For current manufacturing and distribution tech it would be easy to calibrate dosage for size, like a child dose vs adult dose. But, if combined with social credit systems the especially problematic "undesirables" would get the 'super-size' dose.

All speculation and conjecture, I have no evidence of this particular theory, but it becomes a very real and relatively easy possibility in certain malevolent hands.

Expand full comment

agree, they figured out how to make us pay for them to kill us

Expand full comment

And...right on cue...Mercola highlights this today:

Air Vax — The Latest mRNA Delivered Into Lungs, September 29, 2023

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/29/air-vax.aspx

(note to future readers - Mercola's articles only stay live for a few days, then pulls the links, how he defeats the censors. So if you click after that you'll get a dead link.)

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Yale University researchers have developed an airborne method for delivering mRNA right to your lungs

In a study on mice, the scientists created polymer nanoparticles to encapsulate mRNA, making it inhalable

Researchers say this “new method of delivery could ‘radically change the way people are vaccinated,’” making it easier to vaccinate people in remote areas or those who are afraid of needles

An airborne mRNA product could be used to rapidly vaccinate the masses, without their knowledge or consent

Academic endorsement exists for the use of compulsory, covert bioenhancements, including drugs and vaccines, on the public; the U.S. government also has a history of covert bioweapon experiments"

"Yale University researchers have developed a new airborne method for delivering mRNA right to your lungs. The team has also used the method to vaccinate mice intranasally,1 opening the door for human testing in the near future.

While scientists are hailing the creation as an easy way to vaccinate the masses, critics wonder if the development of an airborne vaccine could be used for nefarious purposes, including covert bioenhancements,2 which have already been recommended in academic literature.3

Yale Team Develops Airborne mRNA, Delivers It to Lungs

In a study on mice, Yale scientists created polymer nanoparticles to encapsulate mRNA, making it inhalable so it can reach the lungs. Courtney Malo, editor with Science Translational Medicine, which published the study, explained:4

"The ability to efficiently deliver mRNA to the lung would have applications for vaccine development, gene therapy, and more. Here, Suberi et al. showed that such mRNA delivery can be accomplished by encapsulating mRNAs of interest within optimized poly(amine-co-ester) polyplexes [nanoparticles].

Polyplex-delivered mRNAs were efficiently translated into protein in the lungs of mice with limited evidence of toxicity. This platform was successfully applied as an intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, eliciting robust immune responses that conferred protection against subsequent viral challenge. These results highlight the potential of this delivery system for vaccine applications and beyond."

The team, led by cellular and molecular physiologist Mark Saltzman, explained that the inhalable mRNA vaccine successfully protected against SARS-CoV-2, which "opens the door to delivering other messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics for gene replacement therapy and other treatments in the lungs."5

For the study, mice received two intranasal doses of nanoparticles carrying mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which proved to be effective in the animals. In the past, lung-targeted mRNA therapies had trouble making it into the cells necessary to express the encoded protein, known as poor transfection efficiency.6

"The Saltzman group got around this hurdle in part by using a nanoparticle made from poly(amine-co-ester) polyplexes, or PACE, a biocompatible and highly customizable polymer," a Yale University news release explained.7 In a previous study, Saltzman had tried a "prime and spike" system to deliver COVID-19 shots, which involved injecting mRNA shots into a muscle, then spraying spike proteins into the nose.8

It turned out the injection portion may be unnecessary, and Saltzman has high hopes for the airborne delivery method, beyond vaccines:9

"In the new report, there is no intramuscular injection. We just gave two doses, a prime and a boost, intranasally, and we got a highly protective immune response. But we also showed that, generally, you can deliver different kinds of mRNA. So it's not just good for a vaccine, but potentially also good for gene replacement therapy in diseases like cystic fibrosis and gene editing.

We used a vaccine example to show that it works, but it opens the door to doing all these other kinds of interventions.""

(1/2)

Expand full comment

(2/2)

"Air Vax Could ‘Radically Change’ How People Are Vaccinated

Saltzman says this "new method of delivery could ‘radically change the way people are vaccinated,’" making it easier to vaccinate people in remote areas or those who are afraid of needles.10 But that’s not all. An airborne vaccine makes it possible to rapidly disseminate it across a population.

By releasing the vaccine in the air, there’s no need to inject each person individually — which is not only time-consuming but difficult if an individual objects to the shot. This isn’t the case with an airborne vaccine, which can be released into the air without consent or even the public’s knowledge.

A similar strategy is being used with mRNA in shrimp, which are too small and numerous to be injected individually. Instead, an oral "nanovaccine" was created to stop the spread of a virus. Shai Ufaz, chief executive officer of ViAqua, which developed the technology, stated:11

"Oral delivery is the holy grail of aquaculture health development due to both the impossibility of vaccinating individual shrimp and its ability to substantially bring down the operational costs of disease management while improving outcomes ..."

While the Yale scientists are targeting an intranasal mRNA product, the outcome is the same — get as many exposed as possible with the least amount of cost and effort. According to the Yale study:12

"An inhalable platform for messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics would enable minimally invasive and lung-targeted delivery for a host of pulmonary diseases. Development of lung-targeted mRNA therapeutics has been limited by poor transfection efficiency and risk of vehicle-induced pathology.

Here, we report an inhalable polymer-based vehicle for delivery of therapeutic mRNAs to the lung. We optimized biodegradable poly(amine-co-ester) (PACE) polyplexes [nanoparticles] for mRNA delivery using end-group modifications and polyethylene glycol. These polyplexes achieved high transfection of mRNA throughout the lung, particularly in epithelial and antigen-presenting cells.

We applied this technology to develop a mucosal vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and found that intranasal vaccination with spike protein–encoding mRNA polyplexes induced potent cellular and humoral adaptive immunity and protected susceptible mice from lethal viral challenge. Together, these results demonstrate the translational potential of PACE polyplexes for therapeutic delivery of mRNA to the lungs."

US Government Has History of Bioweapons Release

When you put the pieces of the puzzle together, a disturbing picture emerges. As reported by The Epoch Times, we have a history of the U.S. government taking extreme measures to mandate and promote COVID-19 shots to the public. Now, researchers have developed an airborne mRNA vaccine, offering a vehicle by which to rapidly vaccinate the masses without their knowledge or consent.13

Is there proof that the government or another entity has plans to covertly release an air vax on the population? No. But there is a history of it carrying out secret bioweapon simulations on Americans. In 1950, the U.S. Navy sprayed Serratia marcescens bacteria into the air near San Francisco over a period of six days.

Dubbed "Operation Sea Spray," the project was intended to determine how susceptible the city was to a bioweapon attack. Serratia marcescens turns whatever it touches bright red, making it easy to track. It spread throughout the city, as residents inhaled the microbes from the air. While the U.S. military initially thought Serratia marcescens wouldn’t harm humans, an outbreak occurred, with some developing urinary tract infections as a result.

At least one person died "and some have suggested that the release forever changed the area's microbial ecology," Smithsonian Magazine reported.14 This wasn’t an isolated incident, as the U.S. government carried out many other experiments across the U.S. over the next 20 years.15 So, while it’s disturbing to think of an air vax experiment being conducted on an unsuspecting public, it’s not unprecedented.

Bioethics Study Promotes Covert, Compulsory Bioenhancement

Adding to the story is academic endorsement of the use of compulsory, covert bioenhancements. Writing in the journal Bioethics,16 Parker Crutchfield with Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, discusses moral bioenhancements, which refers to the use of biomedical means to trigger moral improvements.

Drug treatments, including vaccines, and genetic engineering are potential examples of bioenhancements.17 Further, according to Crutchfield:18

"It is necessary to morally bioenhance the population in order to prevent ultimate harm. Moral bioenhancement is the potential practice of influencing a person’s moral behavior by way of biological intervention upon their moral attitudes, motivations, or dispositions.

The technology that may permit moral bioenhancement is on the scale between nonexistent and nascent, but common examples of potential interventions include infusing water supplies with pharmaceuticals that enhance empathy or altruism or otherwise intervening on a person’s emotions or motivations, in an attempt to influence the person’s moral behavior."

Some argue that moral bioenhancements should be compulsory for the greater good. Crutchfield believes this doesn’t go far enough. He also wants them to be covert:19

"I take this argument one step further, arguing that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, then its administration ought to be covert rather than overt. This is to say that it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bioenhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they are receiving the enhancement."

He even goes so far as to suggest "a covert compulsory program promotes values such as liberty, utility, equality and autonomy better than an overt program does."20 So here we have evidence of academic support for covertly releasing drugs and other bioenhancements onto the public. This, combined with the creation of an airborne mRNA vaccine and the government’s history of experimenting on the public, paints an unsettling picture of the future.

Problems With mRNA COVID Shots Persist

Aside from the concerns of airborne delivery, mRNA COVID-19 shots are associated with significant risks — no matter how you’re exposed. People ages 65 and older who received Pfizer’s updated (bivalent) COVID-19 booster shot may be at increased risk of stroke, according to an announcement made by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration.21

Further, a large study from Israel22 revealed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA jab is associated with a threefold increased risk of myocarditis,23 leading to the condition at a rate of 1 to 5 events per 100,000 persons.24 Other elevated risks were also identified following the COVID jab, including lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes), appendicitis and herpes zoster infection.25

At least 16,183 people also say they’ve developed tinnitus after receiving a COVID-19 shot.26 The reports were filed with the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. But considering only between 1%27 and 10%28 of adverse reactions are ever reported to VAERS, the actual number is likely much higher.

It's because of risks like these that informed consent is essential for any medical procedure, including vaccinations. The development of airborne mRNA jabs, however, makes the possibility of informed consent being taken away all the more real."

Expand full comment

Note: This is already done with Fluoride in many municipalities. You have no consent, no "opt out." Other than investing in your own filtration system for ingestion and hoping the aerosolized steam in your showers don't contain enough to harm you when you inhale. Yes. Fluoride is a proven carcinogen. Even their own bioethics guides acknowledge it. They just claim the benefit is greater than the harm.

(FYI - The Chief Bioethicist at the NIH is Christine Grady, aka Mrs. Anthony Fauci. Her ethics. Her values will help determine if the benefit of aersolized "vaccines" are greater than the harms.)

Public Health: Ethical Issues

Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2007

https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Public-health-ethical-issues.pdf

"Chapter 7: Case Study – Fluoridation of water - 119

Introduction - 121

Dental health in the UK - 122

Water fluoridation - 123

Background to fluoride and water fluoridation - 123

Benefits and harms of water fluoridation - 123

Extent of water fluoridation in the UK and worldwide - 125

Alternative fluoride-based measures - 126

Ethical considerations in fluoridation of water - 128

Principles that may be used in favour of water fluoridation - 128

Reduction of risks of ill health - 128

Special care for the health of children - 128

Reducing health inequalities - 129

Principles that may be used against water fluoridation - 129

Not intervening without the consent of those affected - 129

Minimise interventions that affect important areas of personal life - 130

Not coercing ordinary adults to lead healthy lives - 131

Discussion of arguments - 131

Personal values - 131

Reducing inequalities - 132

Reducing ill health by ensuring environmental conditions that sustain health, and caring for the health of children - 132

Alternatives to water fluoridation - 134

Consent - 135

Evidence and information - 136

Evidence - 136

Information - 137

Summary - 139

Expand full comment

and and.. it all ties into the depopulation and control paradigm.

Expand full comment

inventing the greatest threat

Expand full comment

I am so angry at what they did to us.

Expand full comment

It was hard to believe what was happening. I was cynical by nature but seeing what has happened these past few years made me question everything. It has not been easy to reconcile everything and try to move forward.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Sep 29, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Shouldn't "Operation Paperclip" come before JFK assassination? ;)

Expand full comment

Let me give it a shot.

Connect the dots...

JFK assassination

Gulf of Tonkin lie

The incubator babies in Kuwait.

The expansion of NATO to the the Russian border.

The bombing of Serbia by NATO, and the balkanization of Yugoslavia.

The Nein Eleven WTC and Pentagone inside job.

Weapons of mass destruction lie Iraq.

CIA funding of ISIS in Syria

NATO bombing of Libya - Clinton and Sarkozy.

The coup in Ukraine in 2014 organized by Victoria Nuland, and the bio weapons labs moved there by Dr. Mengele 2.0.

Then after thirty plus years of provocation Russia finally reacts by launching their SMO, and the CIA controlled western dinosaur media freaks out about it.

Expand full comment

I hadn't known of the paperclip until recently. My hometown is just seven miles from Westover Air Force Base (Chicopee Ma)--and my childhood ears heard the Sonic Boom with frequency (along with the explosions breaking up the rock to build the Ma. Turnpike). In my first grade class--but not after that year ('56-57) --was a boy with unusual name: my little ears heard it as "Yurgen Eagle". I knew he was from Germany, supposed him to be a D.P. I do not have a memory of his speaking differently from the rest of us, only that his name was different. Now, having learned of Op. Paperclip, I wonder whether his father was assigned to Westover, and whether Jurgen had actually been in the U.S. for years, such that his English would be close-to-native.

Expand full comment

"I wonder whether his father was assigned to Westover, and whether Jurgen had actually been in the U.S. for years, such that his English would be close-to-native."

I came to the US as a ten year old in July of '67. By Christmas that year nobody could hear that I was born in a non-English speaking country.

Expand full comment

I think JFK was the real "in your face" turning point.

The CIA killed him to show us who is really in charge.

Expand full comment

Yes, you're right; but it wouldn't have happened if the CIA had not been formed by merging the US OSS and the NAZI SS at the end of WWII. That merger was only made possible by Operation Paperclip, which was run by American NAZI sympathizers like the Dulles brothers and others like them at places such as Sullivan & Cromwell and Wall Street.

"Were The NAZIs The Greatest Hoax In History?"

https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/01/were-nazis-greatest-hoax.html

Expand full comment

Correct.

I suspect they wanted to fly somewhat beneath the radar until November 1963.

Then, it was full steam ahead.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Sep 29, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

You're a star, sir. We love you!

Expand full comment

Have not changed my mind! An alignment of goals between CIA/DOD+Big Pharma + Gates+ WEF! All working in concert! Judicial Watch just published a White Paper on The planned Covid crisis! Evil beyond belief!

Expand full comment

30 year long term Pharmacist here. My hypothesis is that the 2019 flu shot was loaded with the covid toxin. Look up the Italian autopsy reports from 2020... and compare that to all the died suddenly ones who got the hot lots/bad batches

And this is how the spread the pandemic. Thru a needle. It has been proven that the vaccinated does transfer the toxin to those in proximity to them. Nothing new there. Remember when if a child was given vaccines and if a family member was a cancer patient with low immunity. The cancer doctor would advise the cancer patients to tell their family members to stay away.... why ? Vaccine transfer.

Expand full comment

Do you think that it could have been aerosolized as well in the sky and perhaps big buildings like airports? Seems probable to me.

Expand full comment

I live in a somewhat remote area. We see occasional chemtrails. I've come to notice, that whenever there is a heavy criss-cross chemtrail pattern, so that the sun is hidden, sky grays, ground level may become misty or "thick", people start getting sick. Suddenly, several people either call in or come to work feeling ill. I hear people comparing symptoms. I first noticed this when I felt ill, coming on from being perfectly fine with no warning signs or fatigue. I very rarely feel ill, so it makes an impression.

Others who "don't get sick" were also getting symptoms.

I recalled the chemtrails, immediately preceding.

Then, I started to pay attention. I believe the pattern has repeated several times.

These events seem to affect even the healthy people who "don't call in" and who almost (now) "never get sick".

I've read that both biologics and heavy metals have been found to be chemtrails residues.

Expand full comment

Yes, I was tested for heavy metals and was shocked to have four different ones. I am trying to detoxify now but if it's in the air we breathe and foods it will be difficult to get that done, if ever. I have been using a Berkey water filter at least for twenty years.

Expand full comment

nurse here, witnessed over and over again, the person who took the shot, gets sick and spreads their illness to those around them...it was in the shots

Expand full comment

Interesting observation. If true it is criminal beyond belief! There had to be a method of spreading it around the global regardless of time zone and seasonal variations above and below the equator all on a timely basis! How do prove it?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Sep 29, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Another method! China shut down air travel between provinces!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Sep 29, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

It was reported nearly on that shut down air travel inside China between providence’s but not international travel. False info.. don’t know.

Expand full comment

An Open Letter To World Leaders

December 1, 2023 is the deadline to REJECT the amendments that were adopted on May 27, 2022. Your SILENCE on this issue IS your CONSENT.

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-world-leaders?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=746475&post_id=137283567&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=c55mw&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment

I think Fauci’s direct links with the CIA for the Covid release/coverup and his lies about the jabs, the insistence of Remdesivir, the banning of Ivermectin completely parallels the entire HIV outbreak in the early 80’s. I’m now convinced that was also a lab leak, there were lies about the treatment, the insistence of emergency AZT, banning Bactrim - it’s exactly the same play. So they used Fauci a second time. If Hollywood was already captured by the CIA in the 70’s (see the movie Argo), we have to assume they also captured the CDC/FDA around that time too.

Expand full comment

I still miss my friends, Greg and Barnett, tortured to death by azt .

Expand full comment

I’m so sorry. It was a dreadful time and Fauci was never punished for the people he hurt. Abominable. He also spread panic and lies about how HIV spreads. It is unforgivable. Yet, the CDC promoted him.

Expand full comment

I remember as a senior in high school, the strange pneumonia coming out of San Francisco. The fear added another dimension to dating.

Years later, the rape crisis center provided me with an anti aids cocktail, they messed up the paperwork and only provided half the recommended dosage. I can’t remember if it was 2 weeks or a month. Anyway, that stuff made me feel so sick.

It took me a while to read The Truth about Anthony Fauxchi, made me so outraged.

Expand full comment

Sorry for going off topic a bit. Generations of crimes against our humanity!

Expand full comment

Little Mengele was always a stooge of big pharma, to make profits from useless dangerous drugs and vaccines (see AIDS and AZT). Add the CIA to the list with Gates, China, and the rest.

Expand full comment

There has never been any real “novel” virus nor variants of it. It’s always been a simulation, a computer game, a virus of the mind. All made up to justify introduction of pharmacological genetic preparations which are the only real bio weapons and depopulation contraptions.

Expand full comment

Lab leak vs zoonosis was a planned ruse to give credence to there actually being a novel pathogen.

Expand full comment

Feb 27th was a big day for the gang....around Fauci. Guess what was been pitched: Vaccines. Including Peter Daszak attached to a paper than was targeting children through coercion. Funded by New Venture Fund (Gates throws money at them) and with DHS personnel included in the paper.

Guess who else talked to Fauci that day: Mark Zuckerberg.

https://jasonpowers.substack.com/p/the-labyrinth-connects-new-arpa-h

Moderna & Fauci Sections..

Expand full comment

It all makes perfect sense.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the detailed further info involving Fauci & CIA. Wonder what it would be like to have an open government which operated in the public view, not controlled by intelligence and other non-elected players, US and International. Dream on.

--------------------------------------

Following is last para of longer post, with specific dates of US actions, I made couple days ago on Malone’s substack. I also have a long list of other ‘chemical releases upon innocent people’ type US actions going back to 1931. These include the multiple experimental chemical air drops on about twenty US cities, e.g., SF, NYC, etc. some more than once, years apart. So, don’t think following is something we would not do.

-------------------------------------------------

I’m making some assertions based on dates & docs: COVID-19 lab created? Yes. Lab leak? No. Deliberate release? Yes. Wuhan? No. DoD, yes, in China. “Vaccine” was being developed by US long prior to world hearing of “COVID-19". China was not likely ignorant of our Ukraine/DoD/NIAID/ UNC (Univ. N. Carolina) work. China, March 13, 2020: "It might be U.S. army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! U.S. owe us an explanation!" My opinion, blaming China is a bit off the mark, as our [early] finger prints are all over this subject, explicitly “COVID-19" long prior to its “discovery” and being named, and “mRNA “vaccines”“ being developed prior to ‘discovery’ of the virus in China. Objective: Global - population control & genetics. Chosen point of release: China, of course. (would have blamed on Russia if could have).

Expand full comment

I’ll say it again! There is an alignment of goals between the CIA, plus big Pharma, plus Bill Gates, and WEF that created the greatest crime against humanity that is ongoing, and will be perpetuated until someone finds a way to stop the criminals!

Received a white paper from judicial watch that documents some of the activities That have flowed between the CIA, NIH and the executive branch! I have also read that on December 1 2023 WHO will become the global comptroller of pandemics! A Medical police state will be delivered to humanity! How else can they perpetuate the RNA injection scenario that will maintain big Pharma’s profit goals! Does anyone know who nominated Alex Azar to HHS? Was it Pence?

Expand full comment

I used to think it was strange that Jeremy Farrar's boss at the time at Wellcome Trust was a former head of MI5....

Expand full comment

AGENDA WOMAN Sandi Adams 🔥

https://youtu.be/xKgGhlnhzSw

Expand full comment

Death to tyrants. Death to traitors.

Expand full comment

every day the words come to mind, "Those Bloody Bast**ds"!

Expand full comment

How do the medical papers explain the shedding?

I know it’s used often in “ animal” vaccines , by design.

Expand full comment