16 Comments

Why are these shots still under an EUA when the pandemic is over?

Expand full comment

bc it was never ever about public health.

Expand full comment

It is like I said in another column, the keeping Controlled Substances and Rx drugs "illegal" without a proper "route" through the health care system was really never about the money. Just think how much more money they would make if it all (or most of it) was OTC (Over The Counter) like most everywhere else.

IT WAS ABOUT CONTROL and the eventual WEAPONIZATION of HEALTH CARE.

Expand full comment

There never was a pandemic but you can be sure our Luciferian overlords will continue to terrorize us more under the cover of "public health" policy.

Expand full comment

the executive ordered State of Emergency continues to be renewed by Biden every time it's about to expire. no State of Emergency, no EUAs. the State of Emergency is the legal justification for all the EUA products, so they're not going away until we can get rid of the federal State of Emergency declarations (at least until the end of May when Biden has offered the WHO control of the medical-industrial establishment based on their unilateral opinion that there /might/ be a health threat.)

Expand full comment

In my 38 years as a community pharmacist, I always tended toward being very conservative in recommending any specific medicine use while pregnant or while attempting to get pregnant.

I always researched the drugs as to what did the animal studies revealed.

Never had a good feeling for reckless vaccine administration as had a family with a badly affected child. Vicki was a totally normal female child until the day of the vaccination, it was like a light switch had been switched off! Permanently!

This shook me to my bones, between that and the ongoing HIV cluster, I lost all trust in these Pharmaceutical companies and the government regulators.

Just a few years later, with prices skyrocketing by a factor of 100, and the "hospital supply"

pricing scam (miniscule% of retail pricing), I realized they were totally corrupt.

Expand full comment

Don’t get me wrong, I think the shots are awful and kill people, but I think the Expose is showing bias here. It’s not as clear cut evidence of harm as they imply. It IS evidence of a failure of the Australian TGA to do its job properly though. Certainly this study was not sufficient in sample size to make any conclusions of safety, and yes there was some indication of birth defect (the ribs). I think from looking at the right hand of the table that the pre-implant abortions are within normal range, but with that trend I certainly would have wanted to more testing myself. If I were a doctor I would have advised against vaccination of pregnant women except for those very obese women etc, due to a lack of safety data. Very irresponsible, and down right criminal to have been pushed as totally safe the way they were

Expand full comment

The DEATHVAXX does nothing for obese people, or anyone at all except send them to their early graves.

You are wrong.

Expand full comment

I’m speaking of the knowledge we had back then, when it DID appear to ve working against severe disease and death

Expand full comment

the publicly accessible data then could be interpreted to indicate the "vaccines" were working, but the Pfizer internal documents that are slowly being released clearly show that the "regulators" (and by extension their bosses issuing mandates) were well aware that these garbage products were not even meeting the 50% effectiveness standards previously set by the FDA for vaccines.

Expand full comment

Carefully worded to avoid animal studies with what? Animal studies after they were fed apples? Since these animal studies associated with this injection event were not completed as is normal for new concoctions, over a decade or longer, of course there would be no problems detected.

Expand full comment

I don’t think you are correct here. The animal studies were done in tandem with the animal studies (ridiculous) because of warp speed. No pregnancy one was done in women, of course

Expand full comment

Ok. Since I'm not a expert having no credentials, and only am reading looking for themes, I don't think I have to be correct. Of course, there are so many varying variables no one can be 100% correct.

Somehow the investor class has shielded themselves from liability, its in the language. Maybe not in this particular idea, but its somewhere.

Thanks for your comment.

Expand full comment

Of course you don’t have to be correct. I just think it helps “our” case (those fighting the covid vaccinations) if we keep our facts straight (so as to maintain credibility).

Expand full comment

Ok. Again, thanks for your comment. I would rather not make this an argument (which I could make that you are wrong), but this is just a comment to an author who has my attention.

You ought to feel yourself having made this contribution as straightening out this idea to match the mass formation of the oppositions to this injection event. :-)

Expand full comment

fraud in procurement of the EUA disposes of any freedom from liability

Expand full comment