From British "Judge" Francis Jefferty, “Anybody involving themselves in this type of behaviour, this type of disorder, as an active participant or a curious observer can expect to be, save for the most exceptional circumstances, remanded into custody, and this defendant is remanded into custody…
From British "Judge" Francis Jefferty, “Anybody involving themselves in this type of behaviour, this type of disorder, as an active participant or a curious observer can expect to be, save for the most exceptional circumstances, remanded into custody, and this defendant is remanded into custody.”
The same ol," same ol' of history repeats...The likes of Jefferty and his ilk are with us always, it seems. The battles of this world's War never end.
This is just extra super special, Elizabeth:
From British "Judge" Francis Jefferty, “Anybody involving themselves in this type of behaviour, this type of disorder, as an active participant or a curious observer can expect to be, save for the most exceptional circumstances, remanded into custody, and this defendant is remanded into custody.”
The same ol," same ol' of history repeats...The likes of Jefferty and his ilk are with us always, it seems. The battles of this world's War never end.
They seem to forget that juries decide what happens to people in Britain not judges.
"They" seem to have forgotten so much -- here in the U.S. and in Britain.
So the "judge" is saying that if you happen to be near some type of "commotion" and stop to observe, you too can be arrested????
Yes, guilty until proven innocent. Clearly the "judge" should not be employed as a shoe-shine boy let alone as a judge.