It's not just about deaths though, is it? The injuries must be taken into account, plenty immediate ones, now medium term showing but probably hard to prove, although many warned.
What's going to be really interesting is how many people go and get the new mRNA flu shots.
As I've pointed out for years, notice that they call them "shots," not "vaccines." Not that it matters to the informed, it's all BS, lies, and self-serving propaganda. Just sayin'.
Statistics has been so corrupted I have a hard time trusting any of them, I don't believe the covid injections will be advantageous to good health either in short, medium or long term, I don't care what the numbers say. Breaching all our natural barriers of protection by injecting indiscriminately a poorly researched, badly manufactured substance for a respiratory infection is a deeply stupid concept.
What numbers? There are no data in the world, especially including Pfizer's, that suggests the genetic injections will do anything but maim (in more ways than there are stars in the sky), sterilise and kill.
"Safe" for immune-to-lawsuits Pharma; "effective" for settling the accounts on Social Security and Medicare. Unfortunately, the screw-up is that 'they' didn't intend to kill off those contributing the tax payments--the under 55's. Oh well, we'll do better next time.
Every time I encounter someone I hear they lost parents, friends or collegues, or babies in the past 2 years, whatever age (but most died unexpectedly around 60 yo). It's a "hécatombe" as we say in French. So many have worsen pre-existing conditions. How can people still keep a blind eye????Funeral businesses have no rest in sight (pun intended...). C'mon, we never had this horrific statistic in the past. Ask insurance companies, they have to spit out "unexpected" billions. We have a good expression in French: " motus et bouche cousue" (mute and mouth sewn, to imply silence).
I've been pushing for drawn and quartered. People recoil when they hear that though because they believe we are now in a compassionate age where "cruel and unusual punishment" is no longer permitted. (Ask someone who's been in prison for 20 years what he thinks of our ban on cruel and unusual punishment.) My argument has been that if we were to reinstitute public executions for crimes like these, this insanity would stop now.
Last week kissed goodbye my British family--AZ'd daughter and son-in-law, and the grandchildren. The elephant remained in the house for the whole 3 week visit. This particular compilation of data is the most relevant I have seen, for our personal, familial, situation--the resolutely unvaxxed parents (us), and the aforementioned others. At least daughter did tell me, last November, that she and husband have no intention of vaxxing the children.
Same scenario here...unvaxxed parents visiting vaxxed/boosted son and daughter-in-law after two years of being prevented any contact because we were the “unclean”. Just hoping they live long enough for us to see them again at Christmas.
So about 1.37% of the jabbed population died between Jan21 and May22 (seventeen months)? So what percentage of the UK population died in the seventeen months before the alleged pandemic? Isn't that the stat we need to know to give meaning to the data you kindly cite?
Am I right in suggesting it is about 1.275% (0.9/12 x 17)?
So the approximately 900/100,000 need to be converted to a total population rate. That baseline needs to be deducted. And sound confounding factors need to be added, less car accidents, more suicides, etc.
No. For those that do come forward for another dose, I bid them adieu, with malice, as I believe their choice literally is killing all of us, vaxxed or not.
Maybe, but every one of them that kicks the bucket, else comes down with weird turbo disease never heard of previously, is one less on the other side.
Also, the untold number of cases piling up are red-pilling people faster than a million Morpheuss. (actually not sure what the plural of Morpheus is:-))
How does the 1 in 73 figure compare to previous years + same age groups? What's the number for unvaxd in the same age groups? Is it possible there's a captive population issue here? i.e. nursing home patients? Like, say you're a soulless bureaucrat assigned to inject as many people as possible with saline, just to get your tickboxes ticked. And you found the easiest people to fill your quota were care home patients because they can't really object. When you go back and look at death rates later, they're gonna have a way higher rate than non-institutionalized people of the same age, just due to selection bias.
1 in 73 sounds alarming, but I don't really know what to compare it to, here, so it's a bit murky. How many of those people would have died anyway, in that timeframe? Do we know the normal baseline death rate for Jan-May in those age brackets?
The last graph compares unjabbed/jabbed mortality rates according to 100K person-years. Note the scale is log, so it is clear the jabbed are having a much more lethal time of it.
And if they count someone who was jabbed <2-3 weeks ago as unjabbed (most of the deaths occur in this time period), the figures will be much worse for the jabbed.
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous they cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to the realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” ~ J Edgar Hoover
This quote from Hoover reminds me of when eyewitness testimony of the mass murder of Jews and other subhumans (according to the Nazi racial eugenicists) was first reported to people in power in London and Washington DC (who weren’t aware that there were other people in positions of power in the US and the UK who were actively supporting high ranking Nazis).
“When I [Jan Karski] was in the United States and told [Supreme Court] Justice Felix Frankfurter the story of the Polish Jews, he said, at the end of our conversation, “I cannot believe you.” We were with the Polish ambassador to the U.S., Jan Ciechanowski. Hearing the justice’s comments, he was indignant. “Lieutenant Karski is on an official mission. My government’s authority stands behind him. You cannot say to his face that he is lying.” Frankfurter’s answer was, “I am not saying that he is lying. I only said that I cannot believe him, and there is a difference.”
Looking at the mortality charts by vaccination status, I’m wondering if the UK was counting those who were freshly-vaxxed the first two weeks, as unvaccinated, as the US was? If so, a lot of the “unvaxxed” belong in the “vaxxed” category....
UK at least has apparently kept track of injection dates and compared to death dates. A No No here, as according to our "science" there is no possibility of any connection. Just ask the "experts" or any major MSM. All good here, next question ...
It's not just about deaths though, is it? The injuries must be taken into account, plenty immediate ones, now medium term showing but probably hard to prove, although many warned.
Crime of such a scale and magnitude that the sheeple will never grasp and understand and not want to understand.
What's going to be really interesting is how many people go and get the new mRNA flu shots.
As I've pointed out for years, notice that they call them "shots," not "vaccines." Not that it matters to the informed, it's all BS, lies, and self-serving propaganda. Just sayin'.
So now the question is, will you be coming forward for another dose of the now proven deadly Covid-19 injections this autumn/winter?
-----------
I'm looking forward to be octounvaccinated........
Statistics has been so corrupted I have a hard time trusting any of them, I don't believe the covid injections will be advantageous to good health either in short, medium or long term, I don't care what the numbers say. Breaching all our natural barriers of protection by injecting indiscriminately a poorly researched, badly manufactured substance for a respiratory infection is a deeply stupid concept.
...I don't care what the numbers say.
What numbers? There are no data in the world, especially including Pfizer's, that suggests the genetic injections will do anything but maim (in more ways than there are stars in the sky), sterilise and kill.
So... Safe and effective?
"Safe" for immune-to-lawsuits Pharma; "effective" for settling the accounts on Social Security and Medicare. Unfortunately, the screw-up is that 'they' didn't intend to kill off those contributing the tax payments--the under 55's. Oh well, we'll do better next time.
And you think SSI and Medicare is motivated, think about the NHS's motivation.
Perfectly stated.
Yes...a “safe and effective” way to exterminate people without them
catching on.
Every time I encounter someone I hear they lost parents, friends or collegues, or babies in the past 2 years, whatever age (but most died unexpectedly around 60 yo). It's a "hécatombe" as we say in French. So many have worsen pre-existing conditions. How can people still keep a blind eye????Funeral businesses have no rest in sight (pun intended...). C'mon, we never had this horrific statistic in the past. Ask insurance companies, they have to spit out "unexpected" billions. We have a good expression in French: " motus et bouche cousue" (mute and mouth sewn, to imply silence).
Sounds like a good punishment for the shills who pushed this poison onto the innocent population.
I've been pushing for drawn and quartered. People recoil when they hear that though because they believe we are now in a compassionate age where "cruel and unusual punishment" is no longer permitted. (Ask someone who's been in prison for 20 years what he thinks of our ban on cruel and unusual punishment.) My argument has been that if we were to reinstitute public executions for crimes like these, this insanity would stop now.
Thank you Second (I do question that) Smartest,
Last week kissed goodbye my British family--AZ'd daughter and son-in-law, and the grandchildren. The elephant remained in the house for the whole 3 week visit. This particular compilation of data is the most relevant I have seen, for our personal, familial, situation--the resolutely unvaxxed parents (us), and the aforementioned others. At least daughter did tell me, last November, that she and husband have no intention of vaxxing the children.
Same scenario here...unvaxxed parents visiting vaxxed/boosted son and daughter-in-law after two years of being prevented any contact because we were the “unclean”. Just hoping they live long enough for us to see them again at Christmas.
That's a relief, it is so sad seeing children get these shots.
So about 1.37% of the jabbed population died between Jan21 and May22 (seventeen months)? So what percentage of the UK population died in the seventeen months before the alleged pandemic? Isn't that the stat we need to know to give meaning to the data you kindly cite?
Am I right in suggesting it is about 1.275% (0.9/12 x 17)?
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsintheukfrom1990to2020
So the approximately 900/100,000 need to be converted to a total population rate. That baseline needs to be deducted. And sound confounding factors need to be added, less car accidents, more suicides, etc.
you'd need to break it down by age group. I have no doubt that the record would show the younger age groups were dying at a rate far above baseline.
No. For those that do come forward for another dose, I bid them adieu, with malice, as I believe their choice literally is killing all of us, vaxxed or not.
Maybe, but every one of them that kicks the bucket, else comes down with weird turbo disease never heard of previously, is one less on the other side.
Also, the untold number of cases piling up are red-pilling people faster than a million Morpheuss. (actually not sure what the plural of Morpheus is:-))
Corn pop cautioned a winter of death for the unvaccinated
A twist on projection.
And Putin is, The Evil One? Not so much!
Projection, projection
How does the 1 in 73 figure compare to previous years + same age groups? What's the number for unvaxd in the same age groups? Is it possible there's a captive population issue here? i.e. nursing home patients? Like, say you're a soulless bureaucrat assigned to inject as many people as possible with saline, just to get your tickboxes ticked. And you found the easiest people to fill your quota were care home patients because they can't really object. When you go back and look at death rates later, they're gonna have a way higher rate than non-institutionalized people of the same age, just due to selection bias.
1 in 73 sounds alarming, but I don't really know what to compare it to, here, so it's a bit murky. How many of those people would have died anyway, in that timeframe? Do we know the normal baseline death rate for Jan-May in those age brackets?
The last graph compares unjabbed/jabbed mortality rates according to 100K person-years. Note the scale is log, so it is clear the jabbed are having a much more lethal time of it.
And if they count someone who was jabbed <2-3 weeks ago as unjabbed (most of the deaths occur in this time period), the figures will be much worse for the jabbed.
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous they cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to the realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” ~ J Edgar Hoover
This quote from Hoover reminds me of when eyewitness testimony of the mass murder of Jews and other subhumans (according to the Nazi racial eugenicists) was first reported to people in power in London and Washington DC (who weren’t aware that there were other people in positions of power in the US and the UK who were actively supporting high ranking Nazis).
“When I [Jan Karski] was in the United States and told [Supreme Court] Justice Felix Frankfurter the story of the Polish Jews, he said, at the end of our conversation, “I cannot believe you.” We were with the Polish ambassador to the U.S., Jan Ciechanowski. Hearing the justice’s comments, he was indignant. “Lieutenant Karski is on an official mission. My government’s authority stands behind him. You cannot say to his face that he is lying.” Frankfurter’s answer was, “I am not saying that he is lying. I only said that I cannot believe him, and there is a difference.”
Looking at the mortality charts by vaccination status, I’m wondering if the UK was counting those who were freshly-vaxxed the first two weeks, as unvaccinated, as the US was? If so, a lot of the “unvaxxed” belong in the “vaxxed” category....
It's interesting that they now seem to be publishing stuff like this with seeming impunity.
Good stuff!
UK at least has apparently kept track of injection dates and compared to death dates. A No No here, as according to our "science" there is no possibility of any connection. Just ask the "experts" or any major MSM. All good here, next question ...