20 Comments
User's avatar
Patrick's avatar

They always keep just enough information concealed so that they can fill in the blanks the way they want by innuendo. Narrative over truth.

Expand full comment
Becka Hardman's avatar

Kick em when they're up... Kick em when they're down! - Dirty Laundry!

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

It works. I heard Russian collision so many times... When I saw 1st impeachment, I was stunned at malice of democrats.

Btw, I really enjoyed the lawyers for Trump. And, some of star Republicans.

But I think one of those Republicans went to WEF. What the hell?

I'd go to piss on it

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

Dan Crenshaw. He makes a good show of being an America First Patriot, but that is mutually exclusive with being a WEF “Young Global Leader,” which he is.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Ill watch for him. TY

Expand full comment
Blair's avatar

Dan Crenshaw is an excellent stock trader. I thought that was his full time position.

Expand full comment
Little.Lambsie's avatar

Distraction from ...... Hunter?? Taiwan??? Inflation bull crap bill??? All of the above and don't forget the border. Oh yes...Ukraine too

Expand full comment
Joe Skwara's avatar

How do they know what’s in the boxes since it gives box numbers unless the boxes were sent to Trump and catalogued?

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

How do we know they are not planting things in the boxes since no lawyer was allowed in the house? The whole thing stinks on so many levels!

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

If Trump or his lawyer aren't impeding, why should they have to leave???

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

? Because the fbi, dog are filthy dirty and also scared!

Expand full comment
Motsumi5150's avatar

I wonder about Trumps (audio/video) security camera system. Indoor? likely, outdoor? of course. How epic it would be for Trump to release hidden (indoor) camera/audio footage of the Feds climbing around, looking into every nook and cranny ! I think this whole shit show is going to be EPIC in favor of Trump. Trump is so savvy he likely placed a mole into FBI, NSA and CIA long long before he even ran for President. He is likely 10 steps ahead in every direction.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

People say things to... Could they have been stupid enough to do what that Ex FBI agent did (from impeachment1...

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

If this were such a dire emergency, why did the agents spend the weekend playing in Palm Beach?

Sooo important they didn’t do this within 24 hours?

It’s all more bs to plant something, make more trouble for DJT and give the libs more ammunition(tho all fake!). Sickining. This is NOT the country in which I grew up! Kennedy let us know how dishonest the FBI and all three letter agencies were. He was going to expose them and disband. See how far he got!😢 RFK was also on a path to clean up and he was killed also!😡

(Yes, I’m old and remember all of this. 2nd year of college when JFK a was murdered.)

Expand full comment
Trbrilin's avatar

Records created between January 2017 and January 2021-seems over broad. I'm not a lawyer but I would think they would need to have probable cause that at the crime or conspiracy began on the first day of his presidency and lasted until the last day. That affidavit should prove to be a good read (fictional of course) Its called creative writing.

Expand full comment
Hana C. Waumbek's avatar

The acronym of interest is probably the caveat CNWDI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_Nuclear_Weapon_Design_Information

or possibly the caveat FRD ("Formerly Restricted Data").

Expand full comment
Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

They will probably also claim a CI cannot be revealed hence the predicate must remain classified or some other garbage.

If the affidavit material relates to national security and military secrets then why was the DOJ and the Epstein judge allowed to operate in this realm without the requisite clearances?

Shouldn’t the military have processed the warrant or been a party to it?

Term for the day: Specious Predicate

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 12, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gayla's avatar

Number 2 is obviously not applying here.

Expand full comment