Well that is good except her request was for a public debate not a phone call. Dr Lawrie carried out a meta analysis of the various trials on ivermectin so it would make a good public debate.
but if Yeadon wants to remain low profile or talk confidentially, a public debate would not find favor with him. One can ascertain information by observing the actions as well as the words of a person.
I am not sure how by observing Mike's actions we can learn whether or not his evidence is robust. Mike says he has evidence that Ivermectin destroys fertility but Tess says she has not seen any evidence from any good quality trials. Therefore I would like to see both sides produce their evidence and debate the contents. Trials can be rigged as I am sure you know and Tess has lot of expertise in meta analysis so right now I am inclined to accept her opinion but it would be have been great to hear Mike debate her on this topic. If Mike doesn't accept a public debate it will make me think he has been threatened or compromised in some way. I hope he hasn't.
He confirmed he will speak to her in a reply. Here is the thread https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/fph-the-arguments-for-no-virus/comment/66136532
Well that is good except her request was for a public debate not a phone call. Dr Lawrie carried out a meta analysis of the various trials on ivermectin so it would make a good public debate.
but if Yeadon wants to remain low profile or talk confidentially, a public debate would not find favor with him. One can ascertain information by observing the actions as well as the words of a person.
I am not sure how by observing Mike's actions we can learn whether or not his evidence is robust. Mike says he has evidence that Ivermectin destroys fertility but Tess says she has not seen any evidence from any good quality trials. Therefore I would like to see both sides produce their evidence and debate the contents. Trials can be rigged as I am sure you know and Tess has lot of expertise in meta analysis so right now I am inclined to accept her opinion but it would be have been great to hear Mike debate her on this topic. If Mike doesn't accept a public debate it will make me think he has been threatened or compromised in some way. I hope he hasn't.