I am not sure how by observing Mike's actions we can learn whether or not his evidence is robust. Mike says he has evidence that Ivermectin destroys fertility but Tess says she has not seen any evidence from any good quality trials. Therefore I would like to see both sides produce their evidence and debate the contents. Trials can be rig…
I am not sure how by observing Mike's actions we can learn whether or not his evidence is robust. Mike says he has evidence that Ivermectin destroys fertility but Tess says she has not seen any evidence from any good quality trials. Therefore I would like to see both sides produce their evidence and debate the contents. Trials can be rigged as I am sure you know and Tess has lot of expertise in meta analysis so right now I am inclined to accept her opinion but it would be have been great to hear Mike debate her on this topic. If Mike doesn't accept a public debate it will make me think he has been threatened or compromised in some way. I hope he hasn't.
I am not sure how by observing Mike's actions we can learn whether or not his evidence is robust. Mike says he has evidence that Ivermectin destroys fertility but Tess says she has not seen any evidence from any good quality trials. Therefore I would like to see both sides produce their evidence and debate the contents. Trials can be rigged as I am sure you know and Tess has lot of expertise in meta analysis so right now I am inclined to accept her opinion but it would be have been great to hear Mike debate her on this topic. If Mike doesn't accept a public debate it will make me think he has been threatened or compromised in some way. I hope he hasn't.