i hear ya ! It's all that and more. I think you also could have called on all the FEMALE heroes that , if they could get away from the telly and snacks might storm out into the streets around the whole damn mess of a "country " , beer in hand, and demand equal tyranny for all
i hear ya ! It's all that and more. I think you also could have called on all the FEMALE heroes that , if they could get away from the telly and snacks might storm out into the streets around the whole damn mess of a "country " , beer in hand, and demand equal tyranny for all
everything you are screaming about in your later posts ....... somehow contradicts this.
i could make this personal ........ but instead of calling you nuts or stupid or whatever words you are using ......... I will just let others ( and god, of course) be witness to your ranting.
Come up with a plan ......... instead of screaming so much
Why do you think I'm screaming? I'm not screaming, I'm just candid. Didn't mean to offend, but I do think sending the women out to the front lines does not make sense. I already stated my plan.
Sure... I agree that US men are pretty useless ( big generality... and depends on what the fight is ) . It may be just an excuse, but when it comes down to US citizens going out in the streets to actually TAKE ON the militias that will crush them in seconds .... i think discretion would be my choice as well. The feeling of hopelessness does indeed have its basis in reality. My opinion is that if 100 million females marched with mops and brooms and into the spaces where the tyrants operated..... they would possibly face a better fate then men who would be mowed down like ducks . (possibly . but not if the big C was giving the orders)
Are you nuts? Really? You would rather see women face off with armed tyrants than with Males with weapons????? Think strategically and realistically. It is the women, not the men, who would be mowed down like ducks. Only cowards would allow women to take their places and try to fight against armies.
believe it or not .... they can be just as bad and complicit as men . Leaders of Germany, NZ, European Union, Clinton, etc etc . It's all one BIG CLUB .... with plenty of despicable men AND women in it .
Lots of people are "leading" freedom movements . And things just keep getting worse . Or am i not seeing things correctly ?
(would we all be here screaming about all this shit if things were getting better ? Breaking it down into men, or women ........ just another divisive mistake)
Of course, women can support war efforts and they always have. But, to l eave it to them or to reverse the natural order is not only stupid, but doesn't work. The truth is that the elite globalists will only stop when they are killed. That's reality. Complicit politicians and anyone else involved with them should also be executed. Anyone who thinks we can find our way out against these people is foolish. They have gained control over everything. If voting and movements could rid us of these evil tyrants who want to take over the world, it would have been done long ago. The only way to get the rats off the ship is to throw them overboard.
The reason I say that is not because women can't lead movements - indeed, they can and lead very powerful movements for the good of humanity...but, when it comes to physical fighting (1776), men need to lead that and do most of it for many, many reasons. I grew up in FL around Navy - women serve in the military, of course, but only recently in combat. The center for military readiness has done studies on women in combat and it's a disaster. Women can't go long periods of time by themselves (this I know - we need the company of other women to feel supported, etc.) - men can go for long periods of time by themselves (so say it themselves!). Many women have to come home from active duty on Navy ships because they are PREGNANT. They turn into floating cat houses. Marriages are damaged by this cheating (not to mention that suddenly your husband is a father to someone else's child).
i hear ya ! It's all that and more. I think you also could have called on all the FEMALE heroes that , if they could get away from the telly and snacks might storm out into the streets around the whole damn mess of a "country " , beer in hand, and demand equal tyranny for all
Believe it or not, the women are the ones leading the freedom movements at this point.
everything you are screaming about in your later posts ....... somehow contradicts this.
i could make this personal ........ but instead of calling you nuts or stupid or whatever words you are using ......... I will just let others ( and god, of course) be witness to your ranting.
Come up with a plan ......... instead of screaming so much
Why do you think I'm screaming? I'm not screaming, I'm just candid. Didn't mean to offend, but I do think sending the women out to the front lines does not make sense. I already stated my plan.
I apologize for asking if you're nuts. It was more of a rhetorical question than a slam, but I need to be more careful with my use of words - I agree.
Sure... I agree that US men are pretty useless ( big generality... and depends on what the fight is ) . It may be just an excuse, but when it comes down to US citizens going out in the streets to actually TAKE ON the militias that will crush them in seconds .... i think discretion would be my choice as well. The feeling of hopelessness does indeed have its basis in reality. My opinion is that if 100 million females marched with mops and brooms and into the spaces where the tyrants operated..... they would possibly face a better fate then men who would be mowed down like ducks . (possibly . but not if the big C was giving the orders)
Are you nuts? Really? You would rather see women face off with armed tyrants than with Males with weapons????? Think strategically and realistically. It is the women, not the men, who would be mowed down like ducks. Only cowards would allow women to take their places and try to fight against armies.
believe it or not .... they can be just as bad and complicit as men . Leaders of Germany, NZ, European Union, Clinton, etc etc . It's all one BIG CLUB .... with plenty of despicable men AND women in it .
Lots of people are "leading" freedom movements . And things just keep getting worse . Or am i not seeing things correctly ?
(would we all be here screaming about all this shit if things were getting better ? Breaking it down into men, or women ........ just another divisive mistake)
Of course, women can support war efforts and they always have. But, to l eave it to them or to reverse the natural order is not only stupid, but doesn't work. The truth is that the elite globalists will only stop when they are killed. That's reality. Complicit politicians and anyone else involved with them should also be executed. Anyone who thinks we can find our way out against these people is foolish. They have gained control over everything. If voting and movements could rid us of these evil tyrants who want to take over the world, it would have been done long ago. The only way to get the rats off the ship is to throw them overboard.
The reason I say that is not because women can't lead movements - indeed, they can and lead very powerful movements for the good of humanity...but, when it comes to physical fighting (1776), men need to lead that and do most of it for many, many reasons. I grew up in FL around Navy - women serve in the military, of course, but only recently in combat. The center for military readiness has done studies on women in combat and it's a disaster. Women can't go long periods of time by themselves (this I know - we need the company of other women to feel supported, etc.) - men can go for long periods of time by themselves (so say it themselves!). Many women have to come home from active duty on Navy ships because they are PREGNANT. They turn into floating cat houses. Marriages are damaged by this cheating (not to mention that suddenly your husband is a father to someone else's child).