Can you please show why you believe shedding is real?
Actually exactly what is shedding? The Jab or the so called virus?
I am not disagreeing here but asking what creates the shedding you q shedding (whatever that means to you) is a real thing.
The reason I have this desire to understand your basis is Ivermectin. Not whether it kills cancers as there is enough evidence that does show what you discuss. The issues come from what category Ivermectin is in as it is an Allopathic based treatment. The facts, unhappily, are beyond even what shedding is but that you are using a Big Pharma poison to save people from Big Pharma.
That means you do not yet understand how evil works. I do not argue with the short term results nor the unquestionable massive uptick in Cancer.
The facts regarding what Cancer is. I assume you see Cancer as a sickness of some type. Exactly what sickness is it.
To give you one tidbit only because I want to understand how curing cancer is a positive is one fact. CANCER IS A NATURAL HEALING REACTION. IT IS NOT THE SICKNESS BUT THE BODIES ATTEMPT TO CORRECT A PROBLEM.
Please think about that for a moment. You need not believe it of course. Yet not believing it means you understand exactly what cancer is or your resource partners understand what it is since your claim is along with a few other items it cures cancer.
1. What is cancer
2. Why is cancer more common in people after the jab or as I believe you are saying including people that are in close proximity to those who got the jab by the process being called Shedding.
3. Some evidence would help. It cannot be using Electron Microscopy as a full developed brain absolutely knows that dead crap under a microscope dyed another color is not evidence of anything because it's DEAD. See number 4
4. While I am not a biologist or doctor thankfully I am aware of the processes available for over 100 years to see live images of our blood. In 1930 there were many capable of seeing the true breakdown of our blood to identify what is happening.
In 100 years we are unable to do what was done in the 1930s.
Does that not seem worth looking into? It does to me.
Everything you know is a lie. Until you face that fact you cannot find the truth. Is that not logical?
Please, I beg you, do not see me as someone against everything being reviewed over and over as shit changes fast. I am not against you at all. I am weird maybe but that is about it. Critical thinking is absolutely required here.
Please respond. I promise I will not fight you nor attempt to defame you.
Can you please show why you believe shedding is real?
Actually exactly what is shedding? The Jab or the so called virus?
I am not disagreeing here but asking what creates the shedding you q shedding (whatever that means to you) is a real thing.
The reason I have this desire to understand your basis is Ivermectin. Not whether it kills cancers as there is enough evidence that does show what you discuss. The issues come from what category Ivermectin is in as it is an Allopathic based treatment. The facts, unhappily, are beyond even what shedding is but that you are using a Big Pharma poison to save people from Big Pharma.
That means you do not yet understand how evil works. I do not argue with the short term results nor the unquestionable massive uptick in Cancer.
The facts regarding what Cancer is. I assume you see Cancer as a sickness of some type. Exactly what sickness is it.
To give you one tidbit only because I want to understand how curing cancer is a positive is one fact. CANCER IS A NATURAL HEALING REACTION. IT IS NOT THE SICKNESS BUT THE BODIES ATTEMPT TO CORRECT A PROBLEM.
Please think about that for a moment. You need not believe it of course. Yet not believing it means you understand exactly what cancer is or your resource partners understand what it is since your claim is along with a few other items it cures cancer.
1. What is cancer
2. Why is cancer more common in people after the jab or as I believe you are saying including people that are in close proximity to those who got the jab by the process being called Shedding.
3. Some evidence would help. It cannot be using Electron Microscopy as a full developed brain absolutely knows that dead crap under a microscope dyed another color is not evidence of anything because it's DEAD. See number 4
4. While I am not a biologist or doctor thankfully I am aware of the processes available for over 100 years to see live images of our blood. In 1930 there were many capable of seeing the true breakdown of our blood to identify what is happening.
In 100 years we are unable to do what was done in the 1930s.
Does that not seem worth looking into? It does to me.
Everything you know is a lie. Until you face that fact you cannot find the truth. Is that not logical?
Please, I beg you, do not see me as someone against everything being reviewed over and over as shit changes fast. I am not against you at all. I am weird maybe but that is about it. Critical thinking is absolutely required here.
Please respond. I promise I will not fight you nor attempt to defame you.
Thanks