Discussion about this post

User's avatar
YYR's avatar

Billy Gates is the Good Samaritan arsonist, he starts the fire so he can be The Guy who saves everybody and puts the fire out, get in the papers as the hero, but he's not willing or smart enough to put in the work to become a firefighter (or legitimate researcher or doctor). Besides, there is no one magic geek who saves everybody. But he's going to try, he'll keep starting disease outbreaks.

Billy Gates wants that glory. He's not super bright and lacks understanding of this complex system, he's got plenty of money and syncophants. He'll just happen to have a plan. We're ants in his creepy ant farm waiting for the next Billy-caused disaster.

Expand full comment
Alex Livingston's avatar

The only part of Lew's article (the one you linked to) that I'm highly skeptical of is his backing of “terrain” theory. At best this is a red herring; at worst it is just as good as any other division-causing psyop. It makes my stomach churn that people can be so adamant that viruses either don't exist or are universally benign. How can the extensive sequencing and manipulation of viruses in biolabs and all the details of the structure of spike protein and the modifications to it (like inserting a sequence from the HIV—another pathogen) be explained if viruses are irrelevant? It breaks my head!

Expand full comment
82 more comments...