The terrain theory does not necessitate that viruses do not exist. It just places the immune system as most important.
“Unlike the germ theory, the terrain theory explains why some people get sick while others, when exposed to the same pathogens, do not. For this reason, it is said that on his death bed, Pasteur admitted, “Bernard was right: the pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything.”
The terrain theory does not necessitate that viruses do not exist. It just places the immune system as most important.
“Unlike the germ theory, the terrain theory explains why some people get sick while others, when exposed to the same pathogens, do not. For this reason, it is said that on his death bed, Pasteur admitted, “Bernard was right: the pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything.”
But why the turf war? Why the supposedly competing theories? Why not get together to learn from each other and iron out differences, leaving egos at the door and recognising that contributions may be far from equal, with the aim of having the whole truth garnered by everyone?
There seems to some dispute as to the authenticity of that Pasteur quote.
immune system not up to scratch against a particular virus – that virus = full health
and
immune system up to scratch against a particular virus + or – that virus = full health.
Full health can be achieved EITHER by bringing the immune system up to scratch OR by keeping the virus at bay. Sometimes (often?) only one of these is possible soon enough.
That the immune system can be protective is not contrary to there being “germs”. Just ask Geert Vanden Bossche or Robert Malone or Peter McCullough, to name a few.
Like all bitchute, rumble etc videos and podcasts, this is useless to hearing impaired people.
A lot of boomers are hearing impaired, and they are interested in alternative news, buy none of the YouTube alternatives will caption so they cut off millions of potential views.
Yeah, well when I died I said all kinds of amazing things that came to be true! So there. Prove I didn't? That I'm still presently alive is just a coincidence.
The terrain theory does not necessitate that viruses do not exist. It just places the immune system as most important.
“Unlike the germ theory, the terrain theory explains why some people get sick while others, when exposed to the same pathogens, do not. For this reason, it is said that on his death bed, Pasteur admitted, “Bernard was right: the pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything.”
But why the turf war? Why the supposedly competing theories? Why not get together to learn from each other and iron out differences, leaving egos at the door and recognising that contributions may be far from equal, with the aim of having the whole truth garnered by everyone?
There seems to some dispute as to the authenticity of that Pasteur quote.
Assuming all else good,
immune system not up to scratch against a particular virus – that virus = full health
and
immune system up to scratch against a particular virus + or – that virus = full health.
Full health can be achieved EITHER by bringing the immune system up to scratch OR by keeping the virus at bay. Sometimes (often?) only one of these is possible soon enough.
So can we please bury the hatchet?
That the immune system can be protective is not contrary to there being “germs”. Just ask Geert Vanden Bossche or Robert Malone or Peter McCullough, to name a few.
A real doctor breaks through the programming. Richard Sacks from lost Arts Radio in conversation with Dr Henry Ealy.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u4fjBtrt57Yv/
Like all bitchute, rumble etc videos and podcasts, this is useless to hearing impaired people.
A lot of boomers are hearing impaired, and they are interested in alternative news, buy none of the YouTube alternatives will caption so they cut off millions of potential views.
well said , i agree
Ingenious.
Yeah, well when I died I said all kinds of amazing things that came to be true! So there. Prove I didn't? That I'm still presently alive is just a coincidence.