1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Rob (c137)'s avatar

With chemistry, there are control experiments.

Even if they're wrong about the mechanisms of how atoms and molecules interact, the mechanism is repeatable.

With viruses, they state that they transmit disease and cause cell death. But unlike chemistry and physics, they have not done control experiments to see if their process of isolation gives the same results, whether there is a virus or not.

https://www.newbraveworld.org/stefan-lanka-new-study-disprove-virology/

And here's a study done on transmission way back during the deadly Spanish flu. They couldn't transmit this via injecting infected blood or by spraying sputum. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902

Remember that they thought that scurvy was a contagious disease, until they discovered that it was from a severe deficiency of vitamin C.

Is it scientific to assume that the best cause of a flu season is a virus, or should we look at other factors, such as the already low level of vitamin D in the mostly indoor working first world, which dips even lower due to winter having weaker sun?

A good video on "science says" by the late Liam Scheff who helped expose the "HIV causes AIDS" fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/DttrurRZr5CW/

Expand full comment