Reuters “Fact Check”: “VAIDS’ is not a real vaccine-induced syndrome, experts say; no evidence COVID-19 vaccines cause immunodeficiency. Contrary to claims circulating online, there is no such thing as a “vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” or “VAIDS”, according to experts consulted by Reuters.” “Experts” again. “no evidence”.
Reuters “Fact Check”: “VAIDS’ is not a real vaccine-induced syndrome, experts say; no evidence COVID-19 vaccines cause immunodeficiency. Contrary to claims circulating online, there is no such thing as a “vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” or “VAIDS”, according to experts consulted by Reuters.” “Experts” again. “no evidence”.
Well, news to Reuters, in addition to the excellent proofs provided by 2nd Greatest, here’s a few more chunks of “evidence” of the degradation of CV-19 jabs into negative efficacy.
-------------------------------------------------
Negative Efficacy: In the case of COVID-19, vaccine efficacy appeared to drop from the time of vaccination until it becomes negative. This later clearly demonstrated by the Cleveland Clinic's study of 51011 people) ... the rate of decline in vaccine efficacy appears to accelerate with each successive vaccination (while the rates of severe adverse reactions simultaneously increase).
The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
Reuters fact checkers must not have looked at Pfizer's 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
On page 11
https//phmpt.org
There is a whole paragraph about VAEDS and the possibility of it:
"Vaccine-
Associated
Enhanced
Disease (VAED),
including
Vaccine-
Associated
Enhanced
Respiratory
Disease (VAERD) No post-authorized AE reports have been identified as cases of VAED/VAERD, therefore, there is no observed data at this time. An expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful
observed/expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of
conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the
vaccine safety data continues to accrue. Conclusion: VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death. None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED/VAERD.
In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence, VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue."
Reuters “Fact Check”: “VAIDS’ is not a real vaccine-induced syndrome, experts say; no evidence COVID-19 vaccines cause immunodeficiency. Contrary to claims circulating online, there is no such thing as a “vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” or “VAIDS”, according to experts consulted by Reuters.” “Experts” again. “no evidence”.
--------------------------------------------------
Well, news to Reuters, in addition to the excellent proofs provided by 2nd Greatest, here’s a few more chunks of “evidence” of the degradation of CV-19 jabs into negative efficacy.
-------------------------------------------------
Negative Efficacy: In the case of COVID-19, vaccine efficacy appeared to drop from the time of vaccination until it becomes negative. This later clearly demonstrated by the Cleveland Clinic's study of 51011 people) ... the rate of decline in vaccine efficacy appears to accelerate with each successive vaccination (while the rates of severe adverse reactions simultaneously increase).
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-the-covid-19-vaccines-could-never-c4b?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
---------------------------
Very large Cleveland Clinic study shows more vaccines make you more likely to get COVID
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/very-large-cleveland-clinic-study
-------------------------------------
COVID-19 vaccine – Long term immune decline and breakthrough infection since the introduction of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine by Pfizer in late 2020
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556595/
--------------------
Negative vaccine efficacy keeps rearing its ugly head. Now Kaiser admits it.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/negative-vaccine-efficacy-keeps-rearing
-------------------
Being "not up-to-date" on COVID-19 vaccination linked to lower risk of infection, study suggests
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230614/Being-not-up-to-date-on-COVID-19-vaccination-linked-to-lower-risk-of-Infection-study-suggests.aspx
------------------------
The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35659687/
----------------------------------------
Counties With Highest Vaccination Rates See More COVID-19 Cases Than Least Vaccinated
https://www.theepochtimes.com/most-vaccinated-counties-see-more-covid-19-cases-than-least-vaccinated-counties_4381975.html
-----------------------
South Africa vs. Portugal: Same Variant, Opposite Outcomes
South Africa: 35% vaccinated, 5% had a booster. Portugal: is 95% vaccinated, 70% boosted.
... blips on the radar in South Africa, these same variants ... deadly wave of Covid in highly-vaccinated Portugal... few signs of abating.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/ba5-is-a-variant-for-boosted-people
-------------------------
Top US Hospital: For Every Vaccine Dose, Rate of COVID-19 Infection Goes Up
https://www.theepochtimes.com/top-us-hospital-for-every-vaccine-dose-rate-of-covid-19-infection-goes-up_5246810.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2023-05-07&src_cmp=mb-2023-05-07&utm_medium=email&est=BnkT%2B4gX7zxw1PSDiS1KRJF4I0GW24x3Fmz5LUYmEwRbpfygvry8X5sCYQ%3D%3D
Reuters fact checkers must not have looked at Pfizer's 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
On page 11
https//phmpt.org
There is a whole paragraph about VAEDS and the possibility of it:
"Vaccine-
Associated
Enhanced
Disease (VAED),
including
Vaccine-
Associated
Enhanced
Respiratory
Disease (VAERD) No post-authorized AE reports have been identified as cases of VAED/VAERD, therefore, there is no observed data at this time. An expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful
observed/expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of
conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the
vaccine safety data continues to accrue. Conclusion: VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death. None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED/VAERD.
In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence, VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue."
thanks, yeah, another example of using phrase "fact check" to deliberately mislead. I had thought higher of Reuters.