18 Comments
тна Return to thread

FIRST find out what immigrant brought it in

SECOND then go back to giving it as a SINGLE shot.

Expand full comment

Absolutely! Having single shots is essential for vaxxed-unvaxxed studies. May I suggest stand alone tetanus?

Expand full comment

No you may not.

I already exposed the tetanus shot as being 100% ineffective as per research studies.

Go away with your bs vaccine shilling.

Expand full comment

I'd like to read this, is it still available? Thank you.

Expand full comment

Are insults really necessary? If youтАЩre really the тАЬsmartest,тАЭ youтАЩd know that your readers are anti-vax.

Expand full comment

Yes. Stand alone tetanus, so that it can be avoided like the plague!

Expand full comment
Mar 4Edited

Tetanus and rabies are two where the lifetime benefit may outweigh the risk. (Of course, if there is no manipulation and the stand alone tetanus vaccine is made available again. Lots of тАЬifs.тАЭ) Tetanus is ubiquitous in our environment, and you have to balance a lifetime of worry over the relatively small risk of the shot. Tetanus is anaerobic, and tetanus prone wounds are exactly the ones hardest to adequately clean. Think a 'through and through' nail to the foot, or severe burns with eschar. Disease rates are artificially low because our initial series probably does provide immunity for life; saw a couple cases from Mexico many years back; nasty disease; both died. That said, the current тАЬgive for every scratchтАЭ and тАЬgive to children who are at zero risk of the diseaseтАЭ mentality is ludicrous. The rabies shots are also overused IMO.

Expand full comment

WRONG.

I wrote about this.

Stop pushing this nonsense here.

Seriously.

Expand full comment
User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment

Farm workers should have an un-manipulated version available.

Expand full comment

Last warning.

Read this: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/top-veterinarian-drops-bombshell

Next comment shilling rabies or any other vaccines gets the ban hammer.

Expand full comment

May I suggest not getting a Tetanus shot at all ONLY if you need one? Like after you need it cause you can. Haven't ever had one myself.

Expand full comment

IтАЩm not saying everyone needs one; just saying assess personal your risk - benefit.

Expand full comment

Actually, not quite. It takes time for the antibodies to develop, so effectiveness is not ensured. It is given at the time of a tetanus prone wound, but paired with tetanus immune globulin, that has its own issues.

Tetanus is ubiquitous in our environment, and you have to balance a lifetime of worry over the small risk of the shots. Tetanus is anaerobic, and tetanus prone wounds are exactly the ones hardest to adequately clean. Think a 'through and through' nail to the foot, or severe burns with eschar. Most importantly, disease rates are artificially low because our initial series probably does provide immunity for life; saw a couple cases from Mexico many years back; nasty disease; both died.

Expand full comment

No thanks.

Tetanus shots typically contain aluminum adjuvants such as aluminum phosphate or aluminum hydroxide to enhance the immune response to the vaccine.

These adjuvants help the vaccine to be more effective by allowing for lesser quantities of the vaccine and fewer doses.

Additionally, some combination vaccines that include tetanus, such as DTaP and Tdap, may also contain antigens from Bordetella pertussis, which act as an effective adjuvant.

Expand full comment

The aP component is worse than useless; seems to confer a lifetime increased susceptibility to the actual disease, and may create an asymptomatic carrier state. And you probably know, the P was killing kids;

thatтАЩs why DPT was stopped and TDaP started. Big mistake imo.

Expand full comment

Warning? Geez. I though we had freedom of speech in the USA.

DonтАЩt bother. I wonтАЩt comment again. If a substack cannot tolerate a difference of opinion, itтАЩs not worth my time anyway. BTW, IтАЩm firmly anti-vax except for these two possibilities, and only because IтАЩve seen first hand the ravages of these diseases. Have you? Over and out.

Expand full comment

Huh? Warning? What are you talking about?

Expand full comment