Gents, thanks, but Bernays’s work was certainly not lost on me. I don’t see any contradiction here. I think CJ and 2nd have been overzealous, if not in their characterisation of Desmet’s position, then in the significance they ascribe to that particular position, at the expense of all else that the work has to offer. Simple as that. Thanks.
Gents, thanks, but Bernays’s work was certainly not lost on me. I don’t see any contradiction here. I think CJ and 2nd have been overzealous, if not in their characterisation of Desmet’s position, then in the significance they ascribe to that particular position, at the expense of all else that the work has to offer. Simple as that. Thanks.
Gents, thanks, but Bernays’s work was certainly not lost on me. I don’t see any contradiction here. I think CJ and 2nd have been overzealous, if not in their characterisation of Desmet’s position, then in the significance they ascribe to that particular position, at the expense of all else that the work has to offer. Simple as that. Thanks.