42 Comments
User's avatar
Philip Andrews's avatar

This a reasonable article - but I think the author has made one easy to make but classic mistake in their calculations/interpretation of Dr McCullough's 37% reduction in lifespan figure. I am certain (whether his 37% figure is correct or not) that he meant thirty seven percent of remaining lifespan. That's critically important to understand. It can't be anything other than that , because if you had a 70 year old person who had three vaccines , they couldn't , then suddenly lose thirty seven percent of their lifespan , because they would already be dead at the age of 50 (80 -37% = 50)! It's a basic mistake but important to clarify as it makes the author appear foolish when I'm sure they're normal. However if you were 60 say and lost 37% - that would be 7.5 years lost - far more likely.

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

Absolutely.

Expand full comment
sue's avatar

It wasn't this either. Read my post and read the article. It was relative vs absolute, and the true number was 3.6 months over 82 years (assume rates held even).

Expand full comment
Commoncents's avatar

Great point, thanks

Expand full comment
Marie-Louise Murville's avatar

Has anyone developed a reliable test to assess damage from the shots? Treatment for damage from the shots? It is my understanding that shot batches range from relatively harmless to deadly. Thank you for your important work!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Agreed! How bad is my batch.com show less then 5% of vials numbered accounts for over 90% of deaths ,side effects and thats not counting the approx-25- 40% who died first 14 days they stopped counting after first period,perhaps 3 months after Dec.2020:start of vaxx..

Highlighting red states,christian counties where death rates highest tied to batch important to discourage repeating mistakes ie hey residents of this republican county did you know your vaccine batches #45673# and #4677633 correlated to a 82 percent higher death rate and it keeps on repeating like Pfizer or moderna doesn't like you guys and wants you dead? Etc..

Expand full comment
shibumi's avatar

"Repeating mistakes."

Except.... it wasn't a mistake. It was intentional. That's why they had more deaths in red, Christian counties.

As for reaching our politicians... they're either paid off or vaxxed, and will NOT accept the truth.

Expand full comment
Marie-Louise Murville's avatar

Wow. Horrifying. Diabolical. Thanks, Greg.

Expand full comment
dude 01's avatar

A couple of years ago, I was logging deaths of family, friends and associates, who died or were injured anywhere from three days to three years after having received the jab. I stopped counting at 13. Now I wish I hadn’t stopped counting, having read about the coworker in this article who went to 207 funerals. This is pure madness. The fact that some people cannot see it is ridiculous.

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

The fact is they "WON"T" see which is so unnerving, so horrific.

Expand full comment
dude 01's avatar

So many of the victims are in denial. They don’t want to accept the fact that they have been tricked. Embarrassment adds to this. Also, the MSM keeps firing away with garbage information.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

This morning at our physical fitness gym in a Senior community the local CVS was offering injections from A-to-Z. They have you sign a liability release, but there is no informed consent information about the side effects of the injections when I asked. The CVS pharmacist said that maybe there’s a little redness around the injection site.

Unless NIH mandates that all side effects are provided in writing to the potential patient. Nothing will change and they will continue to push the vaccines. I guess since Biden approved PERK till 2029 we will continue to lose our friends and family members prematurely.

Expand full comment
dude 01's avatar

Your story somewhat reminds me of when I went to pick up a prescription for my 99-year-old mother-in-law at a nearby Walgreens. The manager of the store was standing in front of a table where they were handing out pamphlets, pushing the new flu shot. When he heard my prescription was not ready, he asked me if I would like to get a flu shot while I wait. I told him about the many family and friends who were injured or killed by the Covid vax.

I gave him a “no” reply. He told me that they may have been injured or killed by Covid. Of course I didn’t believe his mess.

As I wandered around the store looking for some other needs, he had a security guard follow me around. I wore that gesture on behalf of the foolish manager, as a badge of honor.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

WOW, a little redness around the injection site???? Guess they got the saline.

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

In the embedded SlayNews video from yesterday's post Steve Kirsch says: "If you're even younger it [the death rate] doubles or more, which means you're cutting your life expectancy by 50%."

Steve's a smart guy, smarter than me, but he's an engineer, not an actuary. I AM a life actuary. I'm an associate in the Society of Actuaries.

Doubling one's mortality rate does not necessarily reduce one's life expectancy by half. Let's take an extreme example. If there is some species that lives to 100, but almost all disease and other risks have almost been wiped out, to the extent that the risk of death is literally one in a million for each and every year from birth until age 100 when all the organs fail at once, then the risk of dying before age 100 for this species is VERY close to one out of 10,000. So the chance of living to 100 is 9,999 out of 10,000.

If this risk is doubled to 2 out of one million, then the chance of a newborn dying before reaching age 100 is very close to 2 out of 10,000. So the chance of living to 100 is 9,998 out of 10,000. In both cases the life expectancy is just under 100.

It's kind of like that. In the US a 40 year old woman (if we don't know anything else about her) has a 2 per thousand chance of dying in the next year. Her remaining life expectancy is 41 years.

IF (and this is a big if) IF the risk of death was increased by 37% for every year of her life, her life expectancy would be reduced to around 36 or 37 years. That's only dropping around 10%.

However, the only information we have is from the first two years. We don't have any information at all about whether people will be getting cancers en masse 10 years later, or Alzheimer's' 20 years later. We just don't know. We have seen that the excess deaths have dropped off some on a population basis after 2023. So that's hopeful.

I would continue to be worried about the health of anyone I cared about who took the clot shot, but it's not accurate to say their life expectancy is 37% less.

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

the jabs are part of the larger Transhumanist Agenda.

consider the nanotech... "Internet of Bodies" or "Internet of Bio-Nano Things"

Expand full comment
CozzyCorner🪔's avatar

12/2019 as a nurse I flagged the corona to my inner circle and did not submit to flu shots or covid shots. Talk about being harrassed at work. I held out and kept working. Exemptions x 4 were submitted to HR abd approved. The mask mandate condition was imposed. The harrassements never stopped until they used gaslighting to push me out into my new job.

Patients in hospitals are the vaccine injured folks. VAIDS is also reality.

2019 flu shots were modified to mRNA. I warned about it but it fell on deaf ears.

I still get mocked, gaslighted, etc and my ex coworkers stalk me online via others who are on social media out of hate.

https://open.substack.com/pub/2ndsmartestguyintheworld/p/mind-blowing-cv19-bioweapon-vax-still?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1s4gol

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

The 2020 FLUARIX (flu) vaccine almost killed me. After that, said no to everything. I was treated like a criminal for suggesting the flu shot was the culprit. They don't like anyone questioning the vaccines, that's for sure.

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

Don't get me started Dee... I warned many not to get the flu shot in recent years... despite them knowing the malfeasances going on... "but I always get it!". OMG. I am done giving out free medical advice lol.

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

What is wrong with people? Who gave them the right to tell others what to do with their bodies? Seriously I've had enough with these psycho medical members feeling high and mighty about the death cult they unwittingly joined and try to force it everyone else. Keep your nose clean and stay out of others business! (I work with them so I can attest to this! Lost a few "friends" due to their complete lack of compassion, though "nurses". 🙄)

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

It is really mind numbing that regular people have taken such a position of division in the face of such huge problems! Families have broken up or cannot speak of things bc of all this , all these lies which have killed and brought great harm. If the truth be known, would they succumb to it? The truth is being said and they avoid it at all cost.

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

People have chosen their tribe. I find it fascinating that most of the people I know who are so invested in abortion rights are gay and/or too old to procreate. Where would we be if they took that off the table and left it to each person to make a choice that works for them? Hmmmm….

Expand full comment
Aunt Ohm's avatar

And nobody told Trump? They just let him stand there and promote it? But now, EVERYONE KNOWS...except for really unintelligent people living under CNN rocks...what's the hold up Bhattychara, RFK, etc?

Expand full comment
Chris C's avatar

What's the hold up?

They are all in on silly.

That should be obvious to anyone who has been researching this far.

Whats most concerning to me is that Dr T is now affiliated with all of these other controlled opposition types, and promoting their remedies.

Expand full comment
Aunt Ohm's avatar

I am not sold on your position that they're all in on hurting or killing babies children adults animals...There's a missing piece of the puzzle that we're not privy to. I don't know what it is, but they can't just pull the plug immediately for some reason. I seriously don't think that RFK Jr waited his whole life in his '70s for this position Trump gave him only to harm and kill babies and children...

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

they are sold on the vaccine myth/history and after taking the jabs many times do not want to be bothered with our scare tactics....many of my hubs family took several. They don't want to hear anything at all. I am speaking of those who took the jab that I know. There is no "good" going on with pharma nor thee DRS promoting the drugs bc they are all in with the profits and the science. [not science] The gov't is not there to help anyone. Trump may be the exception but who knows on this day!! This is the work of the global cabal/antichrist/beast which does rule the world.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

The only missing piece I can think of is the big fat bribe they took and not wanting anyone to know...

Expand full comment
shibumi's avatar

Who is a eugenicist?

Bill Gates, among others.

Expand full comment
SLK's avatar

Like you said, THEY ARE ALL IN!!!

Expand full comment
Isaiah Antares's avatar

Who do you trust?

Expand full comment
Chris C's avatar

Dr T and Dr Madej were/are at the top of my list.

I don't see much from Dr Madej ever since the plane her and her husband were in crashed.

Thankfully they survived, but I suspect that the message was delivered.

Expand full comment
Northern Mainer's avatar

And… let’s not forget that the hospital protocol is STILL remdesivir and a vent. Both guaranteed to kill you in days, yet the protocol that they follow for Medicare and Medicaid patients if they want to be reimbursed. So, NOTHING has changed with this administration. Nothing.

Expand full comment
Franklyn K. Coombs's avatar

Never fell for Covid hysteria! Refused all attempts for any Jabs, including Shingles, Flu, etc.

We are allopaths and help/teach the body to heal itself.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

So much for the "new" and "improved" HHS making a smidgen of difference. Warp speed ahead with no slowing down as big pharma is developing newer mRNA poisons that will require NO trials because the mRNA platform has already been established as safe and effctive.

Expand full comment
shibumi's avatar

And they're talking about giving the thumbs up to the new self replicating mRNA jab for "bird flu."

Expand full comment
Evelyne's avatar

I, for one, want to THANK YOU PROFOUNDLY for sharing your wisdom. For those who are feeling so betrayed by RFK, Jr., I invite you to read Charlene Bollinger’s (from The Truth About Cancer) article from about a week ago. I’m not computer savvy enough to know how to post a link (nor do I honestly care to be…).

People get so much exercise ridiculously jumping to conclusions it’s a wonder we’re in the state of affairs that we’re in🤣. Let’s just TRY to have Faith and send him our prayers… I cannot suggest that article strongly enough as a read. THANK YOU

Expand full comment
sue's avatar

You said... "If you had two or more CV19 jabs, YOU HAVE DECREASED YOUR LIFE EXPECTANCY BY 37%" and will lose 30 years of life expectancy. Absolutely not true and totally misleading! This blog post should be retracted.

Read the study. Time lost unvaccinated was 7.4 days out of 739, Time lost with 2 vaccine doses was 10.1 days out of 739. The difference was 2.7 days out of 739. The 37% is simply 10.1/7.4 days. This is the same way drug and other medical studies manipulate people by showing relative risks over absolute risks. If 1 in 1000 die without a drug but only 1 in 500 die with a drug, they say it's a 50% improvement in death rate. But the % improvement is irrelevant given the low number of deaths in each case.

If the rates are even over a whole lifespan, then you would lose an extra 3.6 months, not 30 years!

In this case, people's life expectancies changed 2.7 days out of 739, or less than 1%.

Now we don't know if vaccine injuries will fade away over time, or worsen over time. But this study certainly can't tell us since we've only had vaccines 4 years. And as they point out, it's unknown why the effect is less pronounced for 3+ vaccines than for exactly 2. There's a good chance this study could not be replicated.

There is a LOT of reason to be concerned about these vaccines. Even one third of a % is a lot of humans. But let's focus on the data we actually have and not muddy the waters by misleading people with interpretations that aren't true.

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

I do not believe the estimates on time of life lost because it is speculation and the math is not correct. But there is every evidence of terrible health outcomes for those who took the vax jabs.

Expand full comment
sue's avatar

You don't have to tell me there is evidence of terrible health outcomes; I got turbocancer from the vax. But there is a gigantic differences between .37% and 37%, and telling statistical lies is not in anyone's best interest.

Expand full comment
Daoqkug's avatar

I would like to know if the risks and side effects are the same for Novavax ( non mRNA)

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

I wish beyond everything that the president and the news stations would report this to all of America. I know that is a pipe dream and nothing will happen to alert people who won't otherwise listen to us who never took the jab. There should be a warning like for a Tsunami or something.

Expand full comment
sue's avatar
Apr 16Edited

It would be reporting a lie. See my comment.

Expand full comment