Wow I did not know that. I have not been tested and only know one person who has. I also read though, that it is absolutely unnecessary to poke in the sinus, that the nose is just as good. Indeed, even if you try to keep from conspiracies, there is so much heaped up, it is almost impossible.
Wow I did not know that. I have not been tested and only know one person who has. I also read though, that it is absolutely unnecessary to poke in the sinus, that the nose is just as good. Indeed, even if you try to keep from conspiracies, there is so much heaped up, it is almost impossible.
It's much more organized and controlled than a simple conspiracy -- from the top, with leaders of many governments and their congresses or parliaments in tow... look at the video of Senator Ron Johnson on "2nd Opinion" on cov id. https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html See my other post on this thread a few minutes earlier... I will add the following: In science, we make testable hypotheses(/theories/ideas) -- and then test to see if our idea is correct. Therefore, if any politician, mainstream media (MSM) "reporter" uses the words regarding science topics: "disinformation, misinformation, or conspiracy theories" without suggesting to make tests on the science they are badmouthing, or worse, with no reason, badmouths scientists with impeccable reputations, then ------ you know one thing, absolutely, about these politicians and MSM reporters: They have a non-truth driven agenda.
Wow I did not know that. I have not been tested and only know one person who has. I also read though, that it is absolutely unnecessary to poke in the sinus, that the nose is just as good. Indeed, even if you try to keep from conspiracies, there is so much heaped up, it is almost impossible.
It's much more organized and controlled than a simple conspiracy -- from the top, with leaders of many governments and their congresses or parliaments in tow... look at the video of Senator Ron Johnson on "2nd Opinion" on cov id. https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html See my other post on this thread a few minutes earlier... I will add the following: In science, we make testable hypotheses(/theories/ideas) -- and then test to see if our idea is correct. Therefore, if any politician, mainstream media (MSM) "reporter" uses the words regarding science topics: "disinformation, misinformation, or conspiracy theories" without suggesting to make tests on the science they are badmouthing, or worse, with no reason, badmouths scientists with impeccable reputations, then ------ you know one thing, absolutely, about these politicians and MSM reporters: They have a non-truth driven agenda.