The shots had an immunosuppressant ingredient to prevent the body from rejecting it before the mRNA could do it's work. With no real studies, we have no idea how bad or for how long.
Also, recent admissions have surfaced that the shots are incredibly inconsistent, in varying levels of decay upon injection. And some intravenous, rather th…
The shots had an immunosuppressant ingredient to prevent the body from rejecting it before the mRNA could do it's work. With no real studies, we have no idea how bad or for how long.
Also, recent admissions have surfaced that the shots are incredibly inconsistent, in varying levels of decay upon injection. And some intravenous, rather than intramuscular injections mistakenly given.
Recall the extreme, narrow conditions required to transport the compound, and the "hot lots" phenomenon. Whistleblowers have said this stuff whould never have been distributed in normal conditions. Hence, nobody knows quite what or where, exactly, they had injected.
The shots had an immunosuppressant ingredient to prevent the body from rejecting it before the mRNA could do it's work. With no real studies, we have no idea how bad or for how long.
Also, recent admissions have surfaced that the shots are incredibly inconsistent, in varying levels of decay upon injection. And some intravenous, rather than intramuscular injections mistakenly given.
Recall the extreme, narrow conditions required to transport the compound, and the "hot lots" phenomenon. Whistleblowers have said this stuff whould never have been distributed in normal conditions. Hence, nobody knows quite what or where, exactly, they had injected.