In a sane world, the CDC and WHO wouldn't even exist because viral "pandemics" are fake. The 1918 Spanish flu is the "poster child" of pandemics but it was caused by vaccines and "treatment" with high doses of aspirin. Perhaps it was a trial-run for the COVID scam.
It’s bizarro world when corporations are more honest on their financial filings than on regulatory filings and they’re allowed to gain approval anyway.
Sounds like a standard disclaimer to me. But true, I think it’s likely the booster or children’s doses will not advance beyond EUA status, so they’ll become “unauthorized” once the “emergency” is declared over. What I’m curious about is, by not obtaining permanent regulatory approval do they also mean they might lose the one license they already have for the original pair of doses for use by ages 16 and up? I understand they have certain obligations they need to fulfill to keep distributing under that license.
Proves they respect the financial laws over human life.
And the Rockefellers will own everything and STILL be unhappy!
Ha!
In a sane world, the CDC and WHO wouldn't even exist because viral "pandemics" are fake. The 1918 Spanish flu is the "poster child" of pandemics but it was caused by vaccines and "treatment" with high doses of aspirin. Perhaps it was a trial-run for the COVID scam.
https://naturalnews.com/2021-12-29-only-vaccinated-died-1918-spanish-flu.html
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/49/9/1405/301441?login=false
Screw efficacy, the more alarming bit is what they say immediately after. They may not be able to show sufficient safety!!!!
Fuck that noise!
It’s bizarro world when corporations are more honest on their financial filings than on regulatory filings and they’re allowed to gain approval anyway.
ADE and OAS at work in UK. They stopped publishing the death figures as 92.4% of deaths were in fully vaxed. Deaths have doubled too. Nothing in MSM
Sounds like a standard disclaimer to me. But true, I think it’s likely the booster or children’s doses will not advance beyond EUA status, so they’ll become “unauthorized” once the “emergency” is declared over. What I’m curious about is, by not obtaining permanent regulatory approval do they also mean they might lose the one license they already have for the original pair of doses for use by ages 16 and up? I understand they have certain obligations they need to fulfill to keep distributing under that license.
in a normal world, one would expect the White House to put a stop to this, at least not vaxxing children, yet everything continues as normal.
technoslavery? no thanks i'll pass
"Cancel Culture" = "Communism."