11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Sounds Like Nonsense's avatar

EXOSOMES..

“It is demonstrated that spike is carried in circulating exosomes for some time and also shown that exosomes can be exhaled via aerosols. This is more likely.“

⬇️

KEVIN MC KERNAN

https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1522944904669896706

Antibodies transferred via aerosols would not be detectable in the kids.

This data implies the parents are shedding spike and the kids are building antibodies to that.

Expand full comment
rjt's avatar

I read the original article and was not happy with the underlying assumption that all of the children's antibodies were caused by the parents' vaxxes.

As children can have asymptomatic infections and the antibodies decline over a few months, as well as the demonstrated early Covid circulation from the Spanish sewage, I was not convinced that all of the antibodies were derived from the adults' vaxxes.

I am far more interested in shedding of spike-containing exosomes as contaminants, while acknowledging Mr. Horvath's comments below.

I did like the technique of recovering viruses and antibodies from the face-diapers.

I am very impressed with Dr. McKernan's research, most recently his demonstration of DNA contamination of the mRNA vaxx.

Expand full comment
Tom Childs's avatar

This sounds more likely, Thanks!

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

"Antibodies" are just as shaky as "viruses," because the "science" is still at the popularized levels of the Rockefellerian flavor or "Medicine."

Of course, it doesn't seem to make any difference what people believe:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-in-where-and-why

Expand full comment
Ian's avatar

This self-promotion is a little too shameless.

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

This is an explanation in response to the previous comment, but cut short in order to save space in the comment sections. Nobody has to read it. Have you?

Expand full comment
aux is playing's avatar

'"Antibodies" are just as shaky as "viruses,"...' I completely agree with your contention of the undeniable, thoroughly-attested Rockefeller take-over and domination of medical "science" and all things related to petroleum-based pharmaceutical corporation-managed public health (and agriculture, and education, and government, and law, and ...)

Apologies for repeating myself (with apparent self-importance, when I know that in reality I'm an inconsequential non-entity), but while I agree that antibodies are not all they've been acclaimed to be, in other ways they're quite a lot more than what the dominant COVID-19 narrative owners would have us believe. Contrary to the laser focus we're supposed to have on antibodies, especially as a consequence of being injected with a "vaccine," vaxxine, or a sLNP-enveloped mRNA suspension gene therapy technology, antibodies are not correlates of immunity. The hyperfocused attention on antibodies, from the spurious "testing" protocols, to antibody titres post-injection, all has the purpose of convincing us that an immunological response that results in the production of antibodies is a measure for resultant immunity. It most definitely is not. The fact is that it is simply not well understood at all yet what the antibodies themselves, and the immune responses that result in their production all entail. As a consequence, as we've now had repeatedly verified, an increase in antibody titres post injection does not mean the injectee has gained immunity to infection to anything.

As for viruses being "shaky," the other egregious lying by omission is the the narrative underscoring and entrenching the falsehood that viruses are pathogens, and only pathogens. There are a lot of biological communication and inter- and intracellular signalling functions, and other functions as well, that are never spoken about in the context of viruses and viral-like particles. The converse of this, which is equally misleading, and is quite frankly a calumny, is the contention gathering steam all over the world that 'viruses aren't real' and virology is an intentional misrepresentation. As for the case of antibodies and our understanding of their purposes and functions, I would counsel to proceed with caution; at least be patient and allow more research to come forward which may help to clarify these topics.

Expand full comment
aj's avatar

the Pasteur/Bechamps argument was over the microbiota being causative of disease, or subsequent to it, not if they existed at all

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Bechamp seems to be closer to what's actually happening, when people get sick, but I have my own paradigm of health/illness:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-people-sick-apart-from

Expand full comment